The Only Blood Culture for Diagnosis of Bacteremia - Comparative Study of Practice
HEMU
1 other identifier
interventional
302
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Current recommendations for the diagnosis of bacteremia based on the embodiment February-March blood cultures separated by a minimum interval of 30 minutes. Each blood culture comprises seeding a pair of aerobic and anaerobic vials inoculated each with 5 to 10 ml of blood. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique depends essentially on the amount of blood removed since there is a direct relationship between the volume of blood inoculated into each flask and the efficiency of the technique. A preliminary study conducted at the University Hospital of Caen found that 14-30% of patients depending on the services had received only one blood culture. In addition, at least four blood cultures in 24 hours were taken for 10 to 20% of patients. The practice of a single blood culture reduces the sensitivity of the analysis due to insufficient total amount of blood collected. The practice of too many blood cultures increases the risk of false positive (presence of contaminating bacteria), generates extra work for healthcare personnel (and laboratory) and represents a significant cost for an unproven benefit. The investigators propose to evaluate a single blood culture sampling technique with seeding 4 vials (2 aerobic and anaerobic 2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2015
CompletedAugust 6, 2015
August 1, 2015
2 years
July 28, 2015
August 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of pathogens identified by each strategy
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of blood cultures contaminated in each strategy
baseline
Study Arms (2)
Multi-sampling strategy
EXPERIMENTAL2 or 3 blood cultures in 24 hours worked at ½ hour intervals with seeding at least a pair of flasks, aerobic and anaerobic, by blood culture.
Single-sampling strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 single dose of venous blood 30ml ± 10ml with seeding 4 blood culture bottles (aerobic and anaerobic 2 2).
Interventions
Comparison between two strategies of blood culture (single-sampling strategy and multi-sampling strategy) for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who is at least 18 years
- Patients admitted to an emergency department of a three CHU Caen, Lille, Rouen
- Patient with clinical justifying the realization of blood cultures (as good practice recommendations)
- Patients who received information about the study or if his legal representatives or his close entourage
- Patient not objecting to the venipuncture
You may not qualify if:
- Patient who direct venipuncture is impossible
- Patient refusing venipuncture
- Patient aged under 18
- Patient with impaired vigilance and not accompanied by a family member or a trusted person may receive clear information protocol
- Vulnerable Patient and not accompanied by a family member or a trusted person may receive clear information protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Cockerill FR 3rd, Wilson JW, Vetter EA, Goodman KM, Torgerson CA, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM, Washington JA 2nd, Wilson WR. Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):1724-30. doi: 10.1086/421087. Epub 2004 May 25.
PMID: 15227618BACKGROUNDLi J, Plorde JJ, Carlson LG. Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2829-31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2829-2831.1994.
PMID: 7852579BACKGROUNDArendrup M, Jensen IP, Justesen T. Diagnosing bacteremia at a Danish hospital using one early large blood volume for culture. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(6):609-14. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037969.
PMID: 9060065BACKGROUNDLamy B, Roy P, Carret G, Flandrois JP, Delignette-Muller ML. What is the relevance of obtaining multiple blood samples for culture? A comprehensive model to optimize the strategy for diagnosing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 1;35(7):842-50. doi: 10.1086/342383. Epub 2002 Sep 10.
PMID: 12228821BACKGROUNDLee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed? J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3546-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01555-07. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
PMID: 17881544BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2015
First Posted
August 6, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08