ELR Monitoring Against Permanent Pacemaker in Atrial Fibrillation
REMAP-AF
Randomised ELR Monitoring Against Permanent Pacemaker in Atrial Fibrillation
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Randomised crossover study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of 5 External loop recorders in detecting pacemaker detected Atrial fibrillation burden.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 23, 2015
July 1, 2015
3 months
July 16, 2015
July 21, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and specificity in detection of pacemaker detected AF burden in comparison to R-test
Sensitivity and specificity of ZIO xt patch, MoMe, TECHNOMED pocket ECG AND Nuubo in detection of pacemaker detected AF burden in comparison to R-test. Sensitivity and sepcificity will be determined by the percentage of pacemaker detected AF episodes that have been detected by each ELR device.
14 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
proportion of pacemaker detected tachyarrhythmias detected in comparison to R-test
14 weeks
Total wear time in comparison to R-test
14 weeks
Proportion of symptomatic arrhythmias detected in comparison to R-test
14 weeks
Cost effectiveness in detection of arrhythmias in comparison to R-test
14 weeks
Other Outcomes (2)
User satisfaction in interpretation of reports compare
14 weeks
Participant feedback on device tolerability assessed by Visual Analogue Score (VAS) questionnaire
14 weeks
Study Arms (1)
ELR monitoring
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm study. All participants with existing permanent dual chamber pacemakers will be monitored with 5 different Loop recorder devices for a 2 week period to assess there sensitivity and specificity in detecting AF burden. The devices used will be 1. R test 2. Nuubo 3. TECHNOMED pocket ECG 4. ZIO xt patch 5. MoMe
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of Atrial Fibrillation
- Dual chamber pacemaker with advanced holter arrhythmia diagnostics
You may not qualify if:
- Previous AV node ablation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil Sulke, DM, FRCP
Eastbourne General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2015
First Posted
July 23, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07