Core Temperature Variations During Midazolam vs Propofol Sedation for Neuraxial Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study is a pilot study aiming to compare the variation in core temperature (measured through the non-invasive device Spot-OnTM3MTM) in patients submitted to neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic procedures, during sedation with midazolam vs propofol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedApril 6, 2016
April 1, 2016
8 months
July 8, 2015
April 5, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean temperature
Comparison between the mean temperature in the two groups
From entering the operating room up to cutaneous closure, an expected average of 1 to 1.5 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Level of sensory block, T1-12/L1-5, assessed by a blunted needle
From 5 to 10 minutes after the performance of the neuraxial block
Study Arms (2)
Midazolam Group
OTHERIn the "midazolam group" the investigators will administer 0,05mg/kg of midazolam, being 2/3 administered before the neuraxial block and 1/3 after.
Propofol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the "propofol group" the investigators will administer 0,033mg/kg of midazolam before the neuraxial block, and immediately after installation of the block the investigators will start a propofol TCI pump (Schnider model) with an effect concentration set at 1mcg/mL. This pump will be turned off at the end of the surgery.
Interventions
The investigators will administer 0,05mg/kg of midazolam, being 2/3 administered before the neuraxial block and 1/3 after.
The investigators will administer 0,033mg/kg of midazolam before the neuraxial block, and immediately after installation of the block the investigators will start a propofol TCI pump (Schnider model) with an effect concentration set at 1mcg/mL. This pump will be turned off at the end of the surgery.
The investigators will administer to every patient: cefazolin 2g iv bolus, ketorolac 30 mg iv bolus, pantoprazole 40 mg iv bolus, paracetamol 1g iv perfusion (initiated 30 minutes before the end of surgery).
Central temperature will be monitored with the SpotOnTM3MTM device from entering till leaving the operating room, through a sensor placed in the patient's forehead
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the foot or knee
- Indication to neuraxial anesthesia
- Surgery duration \> 30 minutes
You may not qualify if:
- Preference for deep sedation
- Preference for no sedation
- Kidney failure
- Hepatic failure
- No signed informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital da Luz
Lisbon, Lisbon District, 1500-650, Portugal
Related Publications (4)
Sun Z, Honar H, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Yang D, Panjasawatwong K, Deroee AF, Salmasi V, Saager L, Kurz A. Intraoperative core temperature patterns, transfusion requirement, and hospital duration in patients warmed with forced air. Anesthesiology. 2015 Feb;122(2):276-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000551.
PMID: 25603202BACKGROUNDEshraghi Y, Nasr V, Parra-Sanchez I, Van Duren A, Botham M, Santoscoy T, Sessler DI. An evaluation of a zero-heat-flux cutaneous thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2014 Sep;119(3):543-549. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000319.
PMID: 25045862BACKGROUNDJeong CW, Ju J, Lee DW, Lee SH, Yoon MH. Lipid-emulsion propofol less attenuates the regulation of body temperature than micro-emulsion propofol or sevoflurane in the elderly. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jan;53(1):198-203. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.1.198.
PMID: 22187253BACKGROUNDIden T, Horn EP, Bein B, Bohm R, Beese J, Hocker J. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M SpotOn sensor) in comparison with sublingual and nasopharyngeal temperature: An observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jun;32(6):387-91. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000232.
PMID: 25693138BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
João Gouveia, Dr.
Hospital da Luz
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2015
First Posted
July 20, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04