The Effect of Priming of Questionnaire Content on Grip Strength in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Illness
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: To determine the association between priming and measurements of hand function such as grip strength Primary null hypothesis: There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS. Secondary null hypotheses: There is no difference in grip strength (last of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS. There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) before and after completing the questionnaires between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2017
CompletedApril 13, 2017
March 1, 2017
2 months
June 15, 2015
December 20, 2016
March 1, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
The pain catastrophizing scale is a 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a lower score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.
enrollment
Positive Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
The positive pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is a positively-phrased 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a higher score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.
enrollment
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Difference in Grip strength of the non-affected hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the non-affected hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Difference in Grip strength of the injured hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the injured hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Difference in Grip strength of both hands after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times with both hands at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Standard PCS
EXPERIMENTALGrip strength measurements and completes standard PCS
Positive PCS
EXPERIMENTALGrip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS
Interventions
Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All English-speaking adult patients visiting the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to complete enrollment forms due to mental status or language problem
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Taylor Pong, Research Coordinator
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David C Ring, MD PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2015
First Posted
July 9, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 13, 2017
Results First Posted
April 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03