NCT02492191

Brief Summary

Introduction Day surgery is a well-established practice in many European countries, but only limited information is available regarding postoperative recovery at home though there is a current lack of a standard procedure regarding postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, there is also a need for improvement of modern technology in assessing patient related outcomes such as native software applications. This article describes the RAPP study protocol, a mixed-methods study to evaluate if a systematic e-assessment follow-up in patients undergoing day surgery is cost effective and improves postoperative recovery, health and quality of life. Methods and analysis This study is a mixed-methods study design that includes a multicenter, two-group, parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) and qualitative interview studies. One thousand patients \>17 years of age who are undergoing day surgery will be randomly assigned to either e-assessed postoperative recovery follow-up daily in 14 days measured via smartphone app including the Swedish web-version of Quality of Recovery (SwQoR) or to standard care (i.e. no follow up). The primary aim is cost effectiveness. Secondary aims are improvements on postoperative recovery, health-related quality of life (QoL) and overall health; (b) to determine whether differences in health literacy have a substantial and distinct effect on postoperative recovery, health, and QoL; and (c) to describe day-care patient and staff experiences with a systematic e-assessment follow-up after day surgery.The primary will be measured at 2 weeks postoperatively and secondary outcomes b) at 1 and 2 weeks and c) at 1 and 4 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,046

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 5, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Smart PhonesAmbulatory CareOutcome and Process Assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cost effectiveness

    The analysis of cost effectiveness will consider the costs associated with the follow-up, gained QALYs from SF-6D. The SF-6D provides a means for using the SF-36 by estimating a preference-based single-index measure for health from these data using general population values. This analysis will be complemented with information regarding the individuals' willingness to pay for the follow-up, number of healthcare contacts, and duration and degree of sick leave.

    14 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Postoperative recovery

    7 and 14 days postoperatively

  • Quality of Life (QoL)

    Preoperatively(baseline) and 14 days postoperatively

  • Overall health

    Preoperatively(baseline) and 14 days postoperatively

  • Health literacy

    14 days postoperatively

  • Patient experience of the intervention

    1 month postopertively

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

RAPP, e- assessed follow-up

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A mobile application (app) is installed on each patient's own smartphone. The app includes the Swedish web version of the QoR (SwQoR). After a patient is discharged from the day-surgery department, the patients in the intervention group will answer the RAPP daily for 14 days. His or her smartphone will initiate the postoperative recovery measurements daily through a "push" function. Each question will appear separately on the mobile phone screen and will disappear from the screen immediately after a response is given. The app also contains a question asking if the patient wants to be contacted by a nurse, which they will answer with a YES or NO. If YES, a nurse at the day surgery department will contact the patient and offer further information and assistance. The number of contacts and the reasons for contact requests will be documented.

Device: Smartphone app Recovery Assessment by Phone Points (RAPP)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive standard care; i.e., no follow-up

Interventions

An e-assessed follow-up of day surgery patients postoperative recovery measured via smartphone app

RAPP, e- assessed follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Understand the Swedish language in speech and writing, have an Android or iPhone OS smartphone, and give their informed consent to participate

You may not qualify if:

  • Undergoing abortion, if their journal entries indicate alcohol and/or drug abuse or memory impairment, if they are participating in another clinical trial or suffering from visual impairment. .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Örebro university hospital, Day surgery department

Örebro, 70185, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Nilsson U, Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Odencrants S, Gronlund A, Hagberg L, Eriksson M. RAPP, a systematic e-assessment of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing day surgery: study protocol for a mixed-methods study design including a multicentre, two-group, parallel, single-blind randomised controlled trial and qualitative interview studies. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e009901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009901.

    PMID: 26769788BACKGROUND
  • Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Eriksson M, Gronlund A, Nilsson U. The Development of the Recovery Assessments by Phone Points (RAPP): A Mobile Phone App for Postoperative Recovery Monitoring and Assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Sep 11;3(3):e86. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4649.

    PMID: 26362403BACKGROUND
  • Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia and Peripheral Nerve Blockade (SwQoR-LA): Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study. JMIR Perioper Med. 2021 Jan 15;4(1):e23090. doi: 10.2196/23090.

  • Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Nilsson U. Sex Similarities in Postoperative Recovery and Health Care Contacts Within 14 Days With mHealth Follow-Up: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Perioper Med. 2018 Mar 26;1(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/periop.9874.

  • Halleberg Nyman M, Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Association Between Functional Health Literacy and Postoperative Recovery, Health Care Contacts, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):738-745. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0672.

  • Dahlberg K, Philipsson A, Hagberg L, Jaensson M, Halleberg-Nyman M, Nilsson U. Cost-effectiveness of a systematic e-assessed follow-up of postoperative recovery after day surgery: a multicentre randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Nov 1;119(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex332.

  • Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Eriksson M, Nilsson U. Evaluation of postoperative recovery in day surgery patients using a mobile phone application: a multicentre randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Nov 1;119(5):1030-1038. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex331.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ulrica Nilsson, Prof

    Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2015

First Posted

July 8, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

July 1, 2016

Last Updated

September 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations