NCT02489279

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of different types of cognitive training on attention in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using mobile software on personal mobile devices.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 10, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 30, 2015

Results QC Date

April 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 19, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Attention trainingMobile devicesBrain training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline in Conners Continuous Performance Test (CPT) RT Variability Scaled Score

    Change was calculated as the score after 10 weeks of treatment minus the pre-treatment score at Baseline. This is a computerized continuous performance task yielding a measure of reaction time (RT) variability over the duration of the task as an assessment of sustained attention control. Less variability in RT is a sign of better sustained attention control. The scaled scores are T Scores and the range is 0-100. Smaller values represent better performance (i.e. lower variability). Consequently, a negative difference value (Post-Pre) indicates improvement. This measure directly addresses the training target, inconsistent control of sustained attention (the variability in RT over time), and is highly correlated with ADHD.

    Baseline and 10 weeks

  • Change From Baseline in Nelson-Denny Reading Test - Comprehension Score

    Change was calculated as the score after 10 weeks of treatment minus the pre-treatment score at Baseline. The Nelson Denny Reading Comprehension test is a time-limited (20-minute) measure of an important daily life activity that is impaired in ADHD, and impacted by poor sustained attention. The score range is from 0-76 with larger values representing better performance. A larger positive difference value (Post- Pre) indicates an improvement in reading comprehension.

    Baseline and 10 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale (ASRS) - Inattentive Subscale

    Baseline and 10 weeks

  • Change From Baseline in Adult Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale (ASRS) - Hyperactive Subscale

    Baseline and 10 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Active - SAC

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral learning by using the Sustained Attention Control (SAC) Method's mobile software to increase sustained attention skills and self-awareness of attention control.

Behavioral: Sustained Attention Control (SAC) Method

Control - Scrabble

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Behavioral learning using the mobile software game "Scrabble" to exercise word processing and executive control functions.

Behavioral: Scrabble

Interventions

Participants use the software for 5 minutes, 3 times per day, 5 days per week, for 10 weeks.

Active - SAC
ScrabbleBEHAVIORAL

Participants use the software for 5 minutes, 3 times per day, 5 days per week, for 10 weeks.

Control - Scrabble

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Meet established Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) criteria for ADHD predominately inattentive or combined subtype with clinically significant levels of impairment, diagnosed by structured clinical interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and corroborating information
  • Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score ≥ 4 for ADHD
  • No lifetime history of DSM-5 bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance abuse, or substance dependence (except nicotine) as assessed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • Able in the opinion of the investigator to complete all required study procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of diagnosis of childhood disorder other than ADHD (e.g. autism, dyslexia)
  • History of any general medical condition likely to require chronic use of medication with identified Central Nervous System (CNS) effects suspected to alter cognitive performance
  • History of seizure disorder, brain tumor, other major neurological disorder or head injury resulting in loss of consciousness
  • Serious oxygen deprivation
  • Current psychopathology requiring ongoing treatment with antipsychotic medications, mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines, or anticonvulsants
  • Current untreated psychopathology which is rated to be primary in terms of severity (greater than ADHD severity)
  • Current treatment with guanfacine.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UCLA Semel Institute

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

M Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsMethods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cell Cycle CheckpointsCell CycleCell Physiological PhenomenaMitosisCell Nucleus DivisionCell DivisionGenetic PhenomenaInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Gregory V. Simpson
Organization
Think Now, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Mark S Cohen, Ph.D.

    University of California, Los Angeles

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Founder and Chief Scientific Officer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2015

First Posted

July 3, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 10, 2019

Results First Posted

July 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Locations