Gait Asymmetry Assessed Using Portable Gait Analysis System
Asymmetry
Gait Asymmetry in Orthopaedic Conditions of the Lower Extremity Assessed Using Portable and Laboratory Based Systems: Cross-sectional Observational Single-centre Pilot Study
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To date, detailed analysis of movement patterns in orthopaedic conditions are mainly performed in research projects. Because these tests are time consuming, they are not feasible in clinical routine or in standard examinations. Novel technologies allow capturing detailed movement patters within a few minutes. The aim of this regional study is to compare aspects of movement tasks measured using a mobile gait analysis system to those measured using laboratory based systems and to determine aspects of gait patterns relevant for different orthopaedic conditions. Moreover, the researchers will investigate if these relevant aspects can be altered using surgical treatment or manual therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2019
CompletedNovember 15, 2019
November 1, 2019
4.3 years
June 23, 2015
November 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
symmetry index
gait asymmetry assessed using a portable and laboratory gait analysis systems
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
change in symmetry index
up to 6 months
maximum isokinetic joint moment [Nm]
up to 6 months
relative electromyographic (EMG) intensity
up to 6 months
differences between maximum flexion and extension [degrees]
up to 6 months
Study Arms (6)
ankle osteoarthritis
patients with ankle osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty
knee osteoarthritis
patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty
hip osteoarthritis
patients with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty
lumbar spinal stenosis
patients with lumbar spinal stenosis scheduled for lumbar spinal stenosis decompression
muscle contracture
patients with functionally limited range of motion at the knee because of muscle contracture scheduled for manual therapy
healthy subjects
healthy subjects
Interventions
patients, who are scheduled for arthroplasty, will be measured before and on average 6 months after surgery
patients, who are scheduled for manual therapy, will be measured before, immediately and on average 1 week after treatment
patients, who are scheduled for lumbar spinal stenosis decompression, will be measured before and on average 6 months after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects will be recruited from patients visiting the outpatient clinic or are scheduled for arthroplasty or LSS decompression at the University Hospital Basel and from the surrounding community.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 40 years, for patients: diagnosed osteoarthritis at the ankle, knee or hip, lumbar spinal stenosis or limited range of motion at the knee
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index \> 35kg/m2
- Use of walking aids
- Inability to walk for 6 minutes
- Neuromuscular disorders affecting gait
- Cardiovascular disease
- Inability to follow procedures due to psychological disorders or dementia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland
Related Publications (12)
Horstmann T, Listringhaus R, Haase GB, Grau S, Mundermann A. Changes in gait patterns and muscle activity following total hip arthroplasty: a six-month follow-up. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Aug;28(7):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PMID: 23906936BACKGROUNDHorstmann T, Listringhaus R, Brauner T, Grau S, Mundermann A. Minimizing preoperative and postoperative limping in patients after total hip arthroplasty: relevance of hip muscle strength and endurance. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;92(12):1060-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182970fc4.
PMID: 23739275BACKGROUNDHorstmann T, Vornholt-Koch S, Brauner T, Grau S, Mundermann A. Impact of total hip arthroplasty on pain, walking ability, and cardiovascular fitness. J Orthop Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):2025-30. doi: 10.1002/jor.22163. Epub 2012 May 31.
PMID: 22653634BACKGROUNDMundermann A, Mundermann L, Andriacchi TP. Amplitude and phasing of trunk motion is critical for the efficacy of gait training aimed at reducing ambulatory loads at the knee. J Biomech Eng. 2012 Jan;134(1):011010. doi: 10.1115/1.4005540.
PMID: 22482665BACKGROUNDMundermann A, Asay JL, Mundermann L, Andriacchi TP. Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics. J Biomech. 2008;41(1):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
PMID: 17678933BACKGROUNDFisher DS, Dyrby CO, Mundermann A, Morag E, Andriacchi TP. In healthy subjects without knee osteoarthritis, the peak knee adduction moment influences the acute effect of shoe interventions designed to reduce medial compartment knee load. J Orthop Res. 2007 Apr;25(4):540-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.20157.
PMID: 17205556BACKGROUNDMundermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2835-44. doi: 10.1002/art.21262.
PMID: 16145666BACKGROUNDMundermann A, Dyrby CO, Hurwitz DE, Sharma L, Andriacchi TP. Potential strategies to reduce medial compartment loading in patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity: reduced walking speed. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr;50(4):1172-8. doi: 10.1002/art.20132.
PMID: 15077299BACKGROUNDNuesch C, Huber C, Paul J, Henninger HB, Pagenstert G, Valderrabano V, Barg A. Mid- to Long-term Clinical Outcome and Gait Biomechanics After Realignment Surgery in Asymmetric Ankle Osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Aug;36(8):908-18. doi: 10.1177/1071100715577371. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PMID: 25795650BACKGROUNDNuesch C, Valderrabano V, Huber C, Pagenstert G. Effects of supramalleolar osteotomies for ankle osteoarthritis on foot kinematics and lower leg muscle activation during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Mar;29(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
PMID: 24445126BACKGROUNDNuesch C, Barg A, Pagenstert GI, Valderrabano V. Biomechanics of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis and its joint-preserving surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 2013 Sep;18(3):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
PMID: 24008209BACKGROUNDNuesch C, Valderrabano V, Huber C, von Tscharner V, Pagenstert G. Gait patterns of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Jul;27(6):613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
PMID: 22261013BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Annegret Mündermann, PhD
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2015
First Posted
July 2, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2019
Last Updated
November 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11