NCT02488642

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin in combination in the management of late intrauterine foetal death.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2008

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Isosorbide dinitrate gel solutionlate intrauterine deathnitric oxide donors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rates of uterine expulsion in the women who received the isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin regimen

    within 15 hours of administration

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • A Bishop score of >7 of administration of the first dose of isosorbide dinitrate

    within 12 hours

Study Arms (2)

isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin

EXPERIMENTAL

Preinduction with isosorbide dinitrate gel solution (80 mg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. If the cervical conditions (\<7 Bishop Score) did not change after the treatment application, a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening.

Drug: Isosorbide DinitrateDrug: Oxytocin

misoprostol-oxytocin

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Preinduction with misoprostol gel solution (100 mcg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. If the cervical conditions (\<7 Bishop score) did not change after the treatment application, participants received a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening.

Drug: MisoprostolDrug: Oxytocin

Interventions

Also known as: Isordil, Dilatrate-SR, Sorbitrate
isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin
Also known as: Cytotec
misoprostol-oxytocin

Oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes.

isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocinmisoprostol-oxytocin

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Closed cervix without evidence of cervical dilation or baseline uterine activity.
  • A Bishop score of \<5, having intact membranes.
  • Gestation greater than or equal to 20 weeks established by the date of menstruation or by fetometry and ultrasound-confirmed late IUFD.

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancies.
  • IUFD after late foeticide or the management of specific medical conditions associated with an increase in the risk of IUFD.
  • Patients with a history of hypertension.
  • Women with a history of unexplained antepartum haemorrhage, pelvic dystocia or any another counter-indications where medications were used.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (30)

  • World Health Organization. Induction and augmentation of labour. In: WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, World Bank, editor. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Geneva: WHO; 2000. pp. 17-25.

    BACKGROUND
  • Koopmans L, Wilson T, Cacciatore J, Flenady V. Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 19;2013(6):CD000452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000452.pub3.

  • Radestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjogren B. Psychological complications after stillbirth--influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1505-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1505.

  • Silver RM, Heuser CC. Stillbirth workup and delivery management. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;53(3):681-90. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb3297.

  • Hughes EG, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 2):847-55. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01216-3.

  • Neiger R, Greaves PC. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7.

  • Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, McIlwain-Dunivan G, Rayburn WF. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):124-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00952-9.

  • Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M. Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):866-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124783.38974.53.

  • Arteaga-Troncoso G, Villegas-Alvarado A, Belmont-Gomez A, Martinez-Herrera FJ, Villagrana-Zesati R, Guerra-Infante F. Intracervical application of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide dinitrate for induction of cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial to determine clinical efficacy and safety prior to first trimester surgical evacuation of retained products of conception. BJOG. 2005 Dec;112(12):1615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00760.x.

  • Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, Baricos WH, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Sep;218(3):739-49. No abstract available.

  • Ignarro LJ. Heme-dependent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide: regulation of enzyme activity by porphyrins and metalloporphyrins. Semin Hematol. 1989 Jan;26(1):63-76. No abstract available.

  • Schmidt HH, Lohmann SM, Walter U. The nitric oxide and cGMP signal transduction system: regulation and mechanism of action. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Aug 18;1178(2):153-75. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(93)90006-b. No abstract available.

  • Murad F. Regulation of cytosolic guanylyl cyclase by nitric oxide: the NO-cyclic GMP signal transduction system. Adv Pharmacol. 1994;26:19-33. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60049-6.

  • Chung SJ, Fung HL. Identification of the subcellular site for nitroglycerin metabolism to nitric oxide in bovine coronary smooth muscle cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990 May;253(2):614-9.

  • Feelisch M, Kelm M. Biotransformation of organic nitrates to nitric oxide by vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991 Oct 15;180(1):286-93. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)81290-2.

  • Michel T, Smith TW. Nitric oxide synthases and cardiovascular signaling. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Sep 9;72(8):33C-38C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90253-9.

  • Hsieh FY, Lavori PW. Sample-size calculations for the Cox proportional hazards regression model with nonbinary covariates. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Dec;21(6):552-60. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00104-5.

  • Wagaarachchi PT, Ashok PW, Narvekar NN, Smith NC, Templeton A. Medical management of late intrauterine death using a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol. BJOG. 2002 Apr;109(4):443-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01238.x.

  • Espey MG, Miranda KM, Feelisch M, Fukuto J, Grisham MB, Vitek MP, Wink DA. Mechanisms of cell death governed by the balance between nitrosative and oxidative stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;899:209-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06188.x.

  • Rapoport RM, Draznin MB, Murad F. Endothelium-dependent vasodilator-and nitrovasodilator-induced relaxation may be mediated through cyclic GMP formation and cyclic GMP-dependent protein phosphorylation. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1983;96:19-30. No abstract available.

  • Lokugamage AU, Forsyth SF, Sullivan KR, El Refaey H, Rodeck CH. Randomized trial in multiparous patients: investigating a single vs. two-dose regimen of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Feb;82(2):138-42. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00084.x.

  • Cabrol D, Dubois C, Cronje H, Gonnet JM, Guillot M, Maria B, Moodley J, Oury JF, Thoulon JM, Treisser A, et al. Induction of labor with mifepristone (RU 486) in intrauterine fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;163(2):540-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91193-g.

  • Urquhart DR, Templeton AA. The use of mifepristone prior to prostaglandin-induced mid-trimester abortion. Hum Reprod. 1990 Oct;5(7):883-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137203.

  • Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2.

  • Mariani Neto C, Leao EJ, Barreto EM, Kenj G, De Aquino MM, Tuffi VH. [Use of misoprostol for labor induction in stillbirth]. Rev Paul Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;105(6):325-8. No abstract available. Portuguese.

  • Bartha JL, Comino-Delgado R, Garcia-Benasach F, Martinez-Del-Fresno P, Moreno-Corral LJ. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;96(3):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00954-6.

  • Titiz H, Wallace A, Voaklander DC. Manual removal of the placenta--a case control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;41(1):41-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01292.x.

  • Gomez Ponce de Leon R, Wing D, Fiala C. Misoprostol for intrauterine fetal death. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Dec;99 Suppl 2:S190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.010. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

  • Nicoll AE, Mackenzie F, Greer IA, Norman JE. Vaginal application of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial to determine effects on maternal and fetal hemodynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;184(5):958-64. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.111797.

  • Arteaga-Troncoso G, Chacon-Calderon AE, Martinez-Herrera FJ, Cruz-Nunez SG, Lopez-Hurtado M, Belmont-Gomez A, Guzman-Grenfell AM, Farfan-Labonne BE, Neri-Mendez CJ, Zea-Prado F, Guerra-Infante FM. A randomized controlled trial comparing isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin versus misoprostol-oxytocin at management of foetal intrauterine death. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0215718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215718. eCollection 2019.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Isosorbide DinitrateIsosorbideMisoprostolOxytocin

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SorbitolSugar AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsCarbohydratesProstaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsPituitary Hormones, PosteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Gabriel Arteaga-Troncoso, PhD.

    National Institute of Perinatology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2015

First Posted

July 2, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion

September 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 24, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-07