Biomarkers of Neuropathic Pain in Women Treated for Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
402
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators aim to identify the key phenotypes (biological, psychological, genetic) involved in the transition from acute to chronic neuropathic pain (NP) by comparison of the neuropathic pain phenotypes and genomics of patients developing NP or not under similar nerve injury conditions. The cohort is part of a previous prospective study of 1000 patients operated for breast cancer of whom 350 have surgeon defined intercostobrachial nerve resection during operation with or without persistent pain and additional 50 patients with pain, but no nerve resection during operation. Patients fill in questionnaires and a detailed sensory examination, cognitive tests, and a cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring are performed during the research visit. A selected group of patients undergo quantitative sensory testing (QST).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 22, 2016
CompletedJuly 3, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.5 years
June 25, 2015
July 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite factors related to the persistence of pain after nerve injury
Study of associations between phenotypic and genotypic data. Phenotyping is assessed by detailed sensory testing, questionnaires related to pain (Brief Pain Inventory, Numeric Rating Scale), psychological factors (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale), personality (Ten-item Personality Inventory) and quality of life (36-item Short Form Health Survey and Insomnia Severity Index). Additionally, cognitive tests, a cold water test with autonomic nervous function monitoring, and a blood sample. DNA will be isolated from blood samples and analyzed for genetic variants associated with new neuropathic pain phenotypes.
5 years
Study Arms (3)
Nerve resection with pain
OTHERQuestionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.
Nerve resection without pain
OTHERQuestionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.
No nerve resection but pain
OTHERQuestionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.
Interventions
The patients immerse their hand into cold water for a maximum of 90 seconds and report their pain intensity every 15 seconds during the test.
The autonomic nervous system is monitored during the cold water test and 15 minutes thereafter.
Quantitative sensory testing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- belongs to the cohort of 1000 breast cancer operated women and has had nerve resection during the operation (with or without pain) or no nerve resection, but pain
- sufficient Finnish language skills
You may not qualify if:
- age over 75 years
- living far away from study site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helsinki University Central Hospitallead
- deCODE geneticscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, HUS, 00029, Finland
Related Publications (7)
Kaunisto MA, Jokela R, Tallgren M, Kambur O, Tikkanen E, Tasmuth T, Sipila R, Palotie A, Estlander AM, Leidenius M, Ripatti S, Kalso EA. Pain in 1,000 women treated for breast cancer: a prospective study of pain sensitivity and postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1410-21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000012.
PMID: 24343286BACKGROUNDMeretoja TJ, Leidenius MHK, Tasmuth T, Sipila R, Kalso E. Pain at 12 months after surgery for breast cancer. JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):90-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278795. No abstract available.
PMID: 24381969BACKGROUNDHaanpaa M, Attal N, Backonja M, Baron R, Bennett M, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Hansson P, Haythornthwaite JA, Iannetti GD, Jensen TS, Kauppila T, Nurmikko TJ, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Serra J, Sommer C, Smith BH, Treede RD. NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Pain. 2011 Jan;152(1):14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.031. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
PMID: 20851519BACKGROUNDFinnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PMID: 25575710BACKGROUNDAho T, Sipila R, Kalso E, Harno H. Temperament and character dimensions differ in chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain and cold pressure pain. Scand J Pain. 2022 Feb 9;22(3):515-525. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0163. Print 2022 Jul 26.
PMID: 35139264DERIVEDHonkanen N, Mustonen L, Kalso E, Meretoja T, Harno H. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery - persistent pain and quality of life 1-8 years after breast reconstruction. Scand J Pain. 2021 Jun 7;21(3):522-529. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0026. Print 2021 Jul 27.
PMID: 34087967DERIVEDSipila R, Kemp H, Harno H, Rice ASC, Kalso E. Health-related quality of life and pain interference in two patient cohorts with neuropathic pain: breast cancer survivors and HIV patients. Scand J Pain. 2021 Mar 17;21(3):512-521. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0177. Print 2021 Jul 27.
PMID: 33725747DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eija Kalso, MD, PhD
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2015
First Posted
July 1, 2015
Study Start
October 28, 2014
Primary Completion
April 22, 2016
Study Completion
April 22, 2016
Last Updated
July 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD available.