Evaluation of Local Anesthetic at Incision Site
The Evaluation of Pre-incisional and Post-closure Local Anesthetic vs. Normal Saline on Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Appendectomies
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patient will have usual appendectomy surgery with an injection of local or saline at incision site either before or after the incision at random. The clinical hypothesis of this trial is that pediatric patients who undergo a local anesthetic pre-incisional and/or post-incisional will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and therefore reduce the amount of analgesics required to keep the patient satisfied. Primary: To determine if local anesthetic reduces postoperative pain. Secondary: To assess the timing of local anesthetic injection affects postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedMay 2, 2018
April 1, 2018
4.9 years
June 22, 2015
April 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of Post Operative Pain Patients Experience
The subjects will be assessed for post-operative pain immediately upon wakening, then at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after procedure.
12 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The total amount of opioid use
24 Hours
Study Arms (2)
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatient will be given saline with a maximum of 30 cc either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Local
EXPERIMENTALPatient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Interventions
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.
Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure
Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing Appendectomy for acute non-perforated appendicitis Must be between 9-17 years old
You may not qualify if:
- n/a
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Related Publications (14)
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
PMID: 2239906BACKGROUNDBuckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PMID: 22099604BACKGROUNDEdwards TJ, Carty SJ, Carr AS, Lambert AW. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy: a randomised controlled trial: Time to stop using local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy? Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):314-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.012. Epub 2011 Feb 13.
PMID: 21324384BACKGROUNDKang H, Kim BG. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010 May-Jun;38(3):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800309.
PMID: 20819419BACKGROUNDLiu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
PMID: 24112856BACKGROUNDMasoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011. Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7.
PMID: 25264663BACKGROUNDOravsky M, Bak V, Schnorrer M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(10):660-2. doi: 10.4149/bll_2014_127.
PMID: 25573735BACKGROUNDPalmes D, Rottgermann S, Classen C, Haier J, Horstmann R. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of intraperitoneal local anaesthesia on pain after laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):824-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5810.
PMID: 17571296BACKGROUNDReynolds SL, Jaffe DM. Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992 Jun;8(3):126-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199206000-00003.
PMID: 1614900BACKGROUNDScholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):680-5.
PMID: 8885946BACKGROUNDThanapal MR, Tata MD, Tan AJ, Subramaniam T, Tong JM, Palayan K, Rampal S, Gurunathan R. Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06210.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
PMID: 23057502BACKGROUNDTomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PMID: 21958060BACKGROUNDWoolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.
PMID: 6656869BACKGROUNDWright JE. Controlled trial of wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg. 1993 Jan;80(1):110-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800136.
PMID: 8428267BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2015
First Posted
June 29, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share