NCT02483611

Brief Summary

The magnesium sulfate and lidocaine have been increasingly used alone or in combination during anesthesia procedure to meet various objectives, such as reduction of pain, use of smaller anesthetic doses and stabilization of hemodynamic parameters. These medicines are often used in combination with neuromuscular blocking agents, which may contribute to the occurrence of residual block in some patients after anesthetic procedures. It was estimated that only 1-3 % of patients with residual block developing clinically apparent events. In a small proportion of patients, the consequences of residual blockade are very serious and even lethal. It is estimated that 40 % of patients with muscle paralysis come to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Considering that: (a) magnesium sulfate and lidocaine are showing an increasing number of applications in various areas of medicine, (b) these medications stand out for their properties analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-arrhythmic, neuroprotective and capable of reducing the demand of anesthetics and opioids, (c) magnesium sulfate as lidocaine has been important part of the therapeutic arsenal to control a large number of diseases (d) the patient surgical surgery or potentially have benefited in particular from its effects, (and) these drugs have been used routinely in many medical services as well as adjuvants in anesthesia, (f) previous studies have shown that magnesium sulfate is able to prolong the duration of neuromuscular blockade by different types of muscle relaxants, with controversies about its effect on latency (g) the effect of lidocaine on the action of muscle relaxants in current literature have shown great controversy and (h) do not exist in the literature studies involving both drugs; the investigators aimed to investigate the effects of magnesium sulphate infused alone or associated with lidocaine on the neuromuscular blockade promoted by cisatracurium, as well as evaluate its possible hemodynamic repercussions. For this purpose the SM was infused in bolus, prior to tracheal intubation and continuously during the maintenance of general anesthesia; the Lidocaine, when associated and the Isotonic Solution were used in the same way and timeline as SM. As secondary objectives it has been proposed to evaluate if the Lidocaine with Magnesium Sulfate would be able to interfere with the hemodynamic stability of the patients in the study.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 15, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 15, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 18, 2015

Results QC Date

September 15, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

OnsetRecoveryLidocaineCisatracuriumMagnesium sulfateIsotonic solution

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Latency

    The latency is computed as the elapsed time to reduce the response of T1 to 5% of the initial contraction force after the infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome meansure was presented in seconds.

    Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

  • Clinical Duration

    The clinical duration is the elapsed time for T1 recovery = 25% (Dur25%) of the original value of T1 after the infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome meansure was presented in minutes.

    Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

  • Recovery Index

    The recovery index is the elapsed time between the T1 recovery =25% (Dur25%) and T1 =75% (Dur75%) after the infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome meansure was presented in minutes.

    Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

  • Final Recovery Index

    The final recovery index is the elapsed time between the T1 recovery = 25% (Dur25%) and T4 / T1 = 80% (TOF = 80%) after the infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome measure was presented in minutes.

    Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

  • Total Duration (Dur95%)

    The total duration is the elapsed time for T1 recovery of the response to reach 95% of the initial after the infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome measure was presented in minutes.

    Participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure, an average of 90 minutes

  • Spontaneous Recovery (T4/T1=90%)

    Spontaneous recovery is the elapsed time for the recovery of the TOF (T4 / T1) response to 90% of the original after infusion of cisatracurium. This outcome measure was presented in minutes.

    The participants were followed during the anesthetic - surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes (24)

  • MAP - M1 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 1)

    This measure of average blood pressure was performed when the patient arrived in the operating room

  • MAP - M2 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 2)

    This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before induction of anesthesia

  • MAP - M3 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 3)

    This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before the start of the infusion of the solution X (magnesium sulfate or isotonic solution) and Y solution (lidocaine or isotonic solution)

  • MAP - M4 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 4)

    This measure of average blood pressure was performed five minutes after M3 (in the end of the X and Y solutions infusion)

  • MAP - M5 (Mean Arterial Pressure in the Moment 5)

    This measure of average blood pressure was performed immediately before the tracheal intubation

  • +19 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group M

EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate. In this group, the patients received magnesium sulfate 40 mg/Kg as a bolus and 20 mg/kg/h by continuous IV infusion during surgery. After the bolus of magnesium sulfate, 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium was infused over 5 seconds.

Drug: Magnesium SulfateDrug: Cisatracurium

Group ML

EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate plus Lidocaine. In this group, the patients received 40 mg/kg of Magnesium Sulfate plus 3 mg kg-1 lidocaine as a bolus and 20 mg/kg/h and 3 mg/kg/h, respectively, by infusion continuously during the surgery. After the bolus of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine, 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium was infused over 5 seconds

Drug: Magnesium SulfateDrug: LidocaineDrug: Cisatracurium

Group C

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Isotonic Solution. In this group, the patients received the volume of isotonic solution equivalent to the volume of solution infused into experimental groups. After the bolus of the isotonic solution , 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium was infused over 5 seconds

Drug: Isotonic SolutionDrug: Cisatracurium

Interventions

Group MGroup ML
Group ML
Also known as: Nimbex
Group CGroup MGroup ML

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I or II
  • BMI between 18 and 29

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of medications that could affect the neuromuscular blockade such as calcium channel inhibitors, anticonvulsants and lithium carbonate
  • Presence of neuromuscular, renal or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Hypermetabolic or hypometabolic states such as fever, infection, and hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism
  • Acid-base disorder, congestive heart failure or conductive heart problems, and those who were being treated for cardiac arrhythmias

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (31)

  • Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.

    PMID: 20442260BACKGROUND
  • Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00004.

    PMID: 12717123BACKGROUND
  • Kim MH, Oh AY, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Do SH. A randomised controlled trial comparing rocuronium priming, magnesium pre-treatment and a combination of the two methods. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jul;67(7):748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07102.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PMID: 22420830BACKGROUND
  • Habe K, Kawasaki T, Sata T. [A case of prolongation of rocuronium neuromuscular blockade in a pregnant patient receiving magnesium]. Masui. 2014 Jul;63(7):817-9. Japanese.

    PMID: 25098146BACKGROUND
  • Doig GS, Simpson F. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005 Jun;20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.04.005.

    PMID: 16139163BACKGROUND
  • Hans GA, Defresne A, Ki B, Bonhomme V, Kaba A, Legrain C, Brichant JF, Hans PC. Effect of an intravenous infusion of lidocaine on cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block duration: a randomized-controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Nov;54(10):1192-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02304.x. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

    PMID: 20840515BACKGROUND
  • Kim MH, Oh AY, Han SH, Kim JH, Hwang JW, Jeon YT. The effect of magnesium sulphate on intubating condition for rapid-sequence intubation: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Nov;27(7):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

    PMID: 26315876BACKGROUND
  • Shahrami A, Assarzadegan F, Hatamabadi HR, Asgarzadeh M, Sarehbandi B, Asgarzadeh S. Comparison of therapeutic effects of magnesium sulfate vs. dexamethasone/metoclopramide on alleviating acute migraine headache. J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.055. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

    PMID: 25278139BACKGROUND
  • Ventham NT, Kennedy ED, Brady RR, Paterson HM, Speake D, Foo I, Fearon KC. Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2220-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6.

    PMID: 26044546BACKGROUND
  • Govindarajan R, Shah A, Reddy VS, Parithivel V, Ravikumar S, Livingstone D. Improving the functionality of intra-operative nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery: is lidocaine an option? J Clin Med Res. 2015 Apr;7(4):282-5. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2025w. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

    PMID: 25699129BACKGROUND
  • Czarnetzki C, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Time course of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block after pre-treatment with magnesium sulphate: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Mar;54(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02160.x. Epub 2009 Nov 16.

  • Czarnetzki C, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Intravenous lidocaine has no impact on rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Apr;56(4):474-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02625.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

  • Hans GA, Bosenge B, Bonhomme VL, Brichant JF, Venneman IM, Hans PC. Intravenous magnesium re-establishes neuromuscular block after spontaneous recovery from an intubating dose of rocuronium: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;29(2):95-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834e13a6.

  • Kim SH, So KY, Jung KT. Effect of magnesium sulfate pretreatment on onset and recovery characteristics of cisatracurium. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jun;62(6):518-23. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.6.518. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

  • Kussman B, Shorten G, Uppington J, Comunale ME. Administration of magnesium sulphate before rocuronium: effects on speed of onset and duration of neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Jul;79(1):122-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.1.122.

  • Cardoso LS, Martins CR, Tardelli MA. Effects of intravenous lidocaine on the pharmacodynamics of rocuronium. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005 Aug;55(4):371-80. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942005000400001. English, Portuguese.

  • Nonaka A, Sugawara T, Suzuki S, Masamune T, Kumazawa T. [Pretreatment with lidocaine accelerates onset of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade]. Masui. 2002 Aug;51(8):880-3. Japanese.

  • Vivancos GG, Klamt JG, Garcia LV. Effects of 2 mg.kg(-)(1) of intravenous lidocaine on the latency of two different doses of rocuronium and on the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70001-0.

  • Ghodraty MR, Saif AA, Kholdebarin AR, Rokhtabnak F, Pournajafian AR, Nikzad-Jamnani AR, Shah A, Nader ND. The effects of magnesium sulfate on neuromuscular blockade by cisatracurium during induction of anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):858-63. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1439-x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

  • Rotava P, Cavalcanti IL, Barrucand L, Vane LA, Vercosa N. Effects of magnesium sulphate on the pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients aged 60 years and older: A randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Oct;30(10):599-604. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328361d342.

  • Gupta K, Vohra V, Sood J. The role of magnesium as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2006 Nov;61(11):1058-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04801.x.

  • McCoy EP, Connolly FM, Mirakhur RK, Loan PB, Paxton LD. Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs and train-of-four fade. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Mar;42(3):213-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03010679.

  • Viby-Mogensen J, Jorgensen BC, Ording H. Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology. 1979 Jun;50(6):539-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197906000-00014. No abstract available.

  • Kopman AF, Kumar S, Klewicka MM, Neuman GG. The staircase phenomenon: implications for monitoring of neuromuscular transmission. Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00023.

  • Staals LM, Driessen JJ, Van Egmond J, De Boer HD, Klimek M, Flockton EA, Snoeck MM. Train-of-four ratio recovery often precedes twitch recovery when neuromuscular block is reversed by sugammadex. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jul;55(6):700-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02448.x. Epub 2011 May 16.

  • Katz RL, Gissen AJ. Effects of intravenous and intra-arterial procaine and lidocaine on neuromuscular transmission in man. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1969;36:103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1969.tb00482.x. No abstract available.

  • Matsuo S, Rao DB, Chaudry I, Foldes FF. Interaction of muscle relaxants and local anesthetics at the neuromuscular junction. Anesth Analg. 1978 Sep-Oct;57(5):580-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197809000-00014.

  • Toft P, Kirkegaard Nielsen H, Severinsen I, Helbo-Hansen HS. Effect of epidurally administered bupivacaine on atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Nov;34(8):649-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03165.x.

  • Loyola YC, Braga Ade F, Poterio GM, Sousa SR, Fernandes SC, Braga FS. [Influence of lidocaine on the neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium: study in rat phrenic-diaphragmatic nerve preparation.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006 Apr;56(2):147-56. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942006000200006. Portuguese.

  • Germano Filho PA, Cavalcanti IL, Barrucand L, Vercosa N. Effect of magnesium sulphate on sugammadex reversal time for neuromuscular blockade: a randomised controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2015 Aug;70(8):956-61. doi: 10.1111/anae.12987. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

  • Paula-Garcia WN, Oliveira-Paula GH, de Boer HD, Garcia LV. Lidocaine combined with magnesium sulfate preserved hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia without prolonging neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 27;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01311-y.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Magnesium SulfateLidocaineIsotonic Solutionscisatracurium

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnesium CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSulfatesSulfuric AcidsSulfur AcidsSulfur CompoundsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Limitations and Caveats

-It was not possible to measure Magnesium sulfate and Lidocaine levels

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dra Waynice Neiva de Paula Garcia
Organization
University of Sao Paulo

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Ph.D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2015

First Posted

June 29, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 15, 2016

Results First Posted

January 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2015-12