Study Stopped
The investigator left the institution so the study was terminated.
Fluoroscopy vs. Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Displacement and Instability of Acute Scaphoid Waist Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim: The aim of this study is to analyze if fluoroscopy is as accurate as computed tomography in diagnosing displacement of acute scaphoid waist fractures. Primary null hypothesis: Fluoroscopy has comparable sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values compared with computed tomography for the diagnosis of displacement of acute scaphoid waist fractures. Secondary null hypothesis: All fractures diagnosed as non-displaced and treated without surgery are healed on radiographs and discharged from care within 6 months of injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jun 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedDecember 22, 2016
December 1, 2016
7 months
June 19, 2015
December 20, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of Fluoroscopy
The reference standard for calculation of diagnostic performance characteristics of fluoroscopy will be displacement on CT scanning defined as follows: Displacement on CT scan defined as any angulation or translation, or greater than 1mm gap at any point in the fracture line.
Less than 2 weeks from injury date
Interventions
Each patient will undergo fluoroscopy-imaging evaluation in the office to determine whether the fracture moves (instability). The investigators will deviate the wrist from ulnar to radial and back in posteroanterior, oblique and lateral views with the wrist in neutral flexion. Any angulation or translation at the fracture site or more than one millimeter displacement or gap will be considered as a sign of instability. The fluoroscopy will be viewed and an image showing the largest gap will be saved. The diagnosis of instability (which is the same as displacement with this test) will be made by consensus of the research team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients (\>18 years) with a radiographically visible acute (\< 2 weeks since injury) scaphoid waist fracture will be included. The subject has to speak and write English or Spanish fluently to be able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Women who are capable of becoming pregnant and not on birth control will be excluded due to the risk of pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Skane University Hospitalcollaborator
- Ghaem Hospitalcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Ring, MD, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2015
First Posted
June 23, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12