Midazolam With Meperidine and Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam With Meperidine and Propofol for Sedation During ERCP
A Randomized Comparison of Midazolam With Meperidine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam With Meperidine and Propofol for Sedation During ERCP
1 other identifier
interventional
258
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of consecutive patients referred for ERCP. A recent study suggested that the addition of dexmedetomidine to the midazolam-meperidine regimen (MMD)provided better sedative efficacy and a superior safety profile during ERCP compared with a midazolam-meperidine regimen. Further study is warranted to compare an MMD regimen with propofol-based regimen. Randomization is performed by use of a computer-generated random allocations in a ratio of 1:1 in balanced blocks of 4. A separate sedating nurse, who don't participate in the study, is the only person with knowledge of the sedation regimen. This separate nurse repeated the injection of propofol and completed questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2017
CompletedApril 6, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.6 years
June 14, 2015
April 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the rates of cardiopulmonary complications
respiratory depression (≤10 breaths/min); desaturation (SaO2\<90% with no recovery against a verbal stimulus or jaw extension); hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg or 20% reduction from baseline mean blood pressure
From start point of the procedure(ERCP) to 60 minutes after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sedation efficacy
From start point of the procedure(ERCP) to 1 hour after the procedure
procedural satisfaction
From start point of the procedure(ERCP) to 1 day after the procedure
Speed of recovery
From start point of the procedure(ERCP) to 1 hour after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
MMD arm
EXPERIMENTALBoth midazolam® (0.05 mg/kg, 30% reduction for patients if age ≥70 or ASA class III-IV; Bukwang Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and meperidine (50mg. 25mg for patients aged ≥70 years; pethidine HCL, Hana Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) are given intravenously at the initiation of sedation. In addition, a continuous IV infusion of dexmedetomidine (1ug/kg/h, Precedex; Hospira, Seoul, Republic of Korea) is administered 15 min before the ERCP till complete procedure
BPS arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIV bolus dose of midazolam® (0.06mg/kg, 50% reduction for patients if age ≥70 or ASA class III-IV; Bukwang Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and meperidine (50mg. 25mg for patients aged ≥70 years; pethidine HCL, Hana Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea). Repeated doses of 10-20 mg propofol® are titrated to achieve the target level of sedation. 0.9% NaCl 1μg/Kg•hr IV continuous infusion, initiated 15 min before the procedure (ERCP) till complete procedure
Interventions
midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, 30% reduction for patients if age ≥70 or ASA class III-IV; Bukwang Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea)
Meperidine (50mg. 25mg for patients aged ≥70 years; pethidine HCL, Hana Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea).
Repeated doses of 10-20 mg propofol are titrated to achieve the target level of sedation.
Dexmedetomidine (1μg/kg/h, Precedex; Hospira, Seoul, Republic of Korea) or the same volume of normal saline were administered in the MMD and midazolam-meperidine group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Those who are scheduled for ERCPs
- aged 18 to 80 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I to III
You may not qualify if:
- ASA IV and V
- History of allergies to drug used
- refuse to participate the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dankook University College of Medicine
Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, 330-715, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jun Ho Choi, MD
Dankook University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2015
First Posted
June 19, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 30, 2016
Study Completion
January 30, 2017
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04