Efficacy in Walked Distance of Indacaterol vs Tiotropium in Women With COPD Secondary to Biomass (EMERALD)
EMERAL
Efficacy and Acute Effects on Walked Distance froM basEline and Post Dose of indacateRol vs Tiotropium in Women With modeRAte to Severe COPD Secondary to Biomass Exposure: Open Label Crossover Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) secondary to biomass exposure constitutes a chronic respiratory condition frequently excluded from large clinical trials. Biomass exposure COPD have some histopathologic, clinical, radiological and functional differences with tobacco smoke COPD. However, until now, there are no evidence in this patients about the clinical response to bronchodilators routinely used in tobacco smoke COPD. Primary objective: To compare changes in walked meters from baseline on six minute walking test (6MWT) to 23:45 hours after one dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD secondary to biomass exposure. Secondary objectives: To compare changes in pulmonary function (inspiratory capacity, Forced Expiratory Volume in first second (FEV1) milliliters, FEV1 "through") from baseline (-10 minutes) to 23:45 hours after one dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD secondary to biomass exposure. This will be an open label study, double blinded, cross over and conducted at specialized respiratory care center (National Institute of Respiratory Diseases), to compare the acute effects of ultra long acting bronchodilators used in tobacco smoke exposure COPD. Unicentric study. Ethics Committee approbation: C 22-12
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 16, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.2 years
May 22, 2015
October 14, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
changes in walked meters on six minute walking test (6MWT) from baseline to 23:45 hours after one dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD secondary to biomass exposure.
baseline, 30, 60, 240 and 23:45 hours post dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium
Secondary Outcomes (4)
changes in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) from baseline (-10 minutes) to 30, 60, 240 minutes and 23:45 hours post dose of Indacaterol (150 µg) vs Tiotropium (18µg) in patients with with biomass smoke COPD.
baseline, 30, 60, 240 and 23:45 hours post dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium
the 'trough' FEV1 (mean of values at 23 h 10 min and 23 h 45 min post-dose) after one dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium in patients with COPD secondary to biomass exposure.
23:10 and 23:45 hours post dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium
changes in dyspnea perception by using the Borg scale from baseline (-10 minutes) to 30, 60, 240 min and 23:45 hours post dose of Indacaterol (150 µg) vs Tiotropium (18 µg) in patients with COPD secondary to biomass exposure.
baseline, 30, 60, 240 and 23:45 hours post dose of indacaterol vs tiotropium
the frequency of adverse events presented during the study, between indacaterol vs tiotropium arm
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
indacaterol
EXPERIMENTALIndacaterol 150 mcgr, one inhaled capsule, dose once time on visit one, with dry powder inhaler device.
Tiotropium
ACTIVE COMPARATORTiotropium 18 mcgr, 1 inhaled capsule, dose once time a Day, with dry powder inhaler device.
Interventions
Indacaterol, one inhales capsule, 150 mcgr, by dry powder dispositive
Tiotropium 18 mcgr, one inhaled capsule, by dry powder inhaler handihaler
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mexican patients at the COPD outpatient clinic
- Age: \>50
- Female (female eligibility criteria are: Women in no fertile age who are non pregnant and committed to use effective contraception).
- FEV1 less than 80% of predicted and risk of exacerbation (GOLD update 2011) B, C or D
- Women with COPD diagnostic with biomass exposition (defined with an Hours/years index \>200 hr/y).
- Be Able to assist at the different visits during the study.
- Be Able to performed the spirometry
- Patients without contraindications to perform the six-minute walk test.
- Informed consent signed.
- With amenorrhea history more than a year duration.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Use of Methotrexate, gold salts, troleandomycin, cyclosporine, immunosuppressants,
- History of uncontrolled renal disease, liver disease, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, neurologic disease, hematologic disease, oncologic disease, or autoimmune disease.
- Any alteration in normal values of the following Laboratory test: liver test, PIE, Biochemistry tests.
- History of asthma, bronchiectases, tuberculosis, recent respiratory tract infection, were hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation (6 weeks prior to visit 1), any significant pulmonary disease o cardiovascular abnormality
- Patients that is under suspicion of having cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, "Ismael Cosío Villegas"
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico
Related Publications (7)
Perez-Padilla R, Regalado J, Vedal S, Pare P, Chapela R, Sansores R, Selman M. Exposure to biomass smoke and chronic airway disease in Mexican women. A case-control study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Sep;154(3 Pt 1):701-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810608.
PMID: 8810608RESULTBruce N, Perez-Padilla R, Albalak R. Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(9):1078-92.
PMID: 11019457RESULTTorres-Duque C, Maldonado D, Perez-Padilla R, Ezzati M, Viegi G; Forum of International Respiratory Studies (FIRS) Task Force on Health Effects of Biomass Exposure. Biomass fuels and respiratory diseases: a review of the evidence. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 Jul 15;5(5):577-90. doi: 10.1513/pats.200707-100RP.
PMID: 18625750RESULTRegalado J, Perez-Padilla R, Sansores R, Paramo Ramirez JI, Brauer M, Pare P, Vedal S. The effect of biomass burning on respiratory symptoms and lung function in rural Mexican women. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct 15;174(8):901-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-479OC. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
PMID: 16799080RESULTCaballero A, Torres-Duque CA, Jaramillo C, Bolivar F, Sanabria F, Osorio P, Orduz C, Guevara DP, Maldonado D. Prevalence of COPD in five Colombian cities situated at low, medium, and high altitude (PREPOCOL study). Chest. 2008 Feb;133(2):343-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1361. Epub 2007 Oct 20.
PMID: 17951621RESULTRamirez-Venegas A, Sansores RH, Perez-Padilla R, Regalado J, Velazquez A, Sanchez C, Mayar ME. Survival of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to biomass smoke and tobacco. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb 15;173(4):393-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200504-568OC. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
PMID: 16322646RESULTAaron SD, Vandemheen KL, Fergusson D, Maltais F, Bourbeau J, Goldstein R, Balter M, O'Donnell D, McIvor A, Sharma S, Bishop G, Anthony J, Cowie R, Field S, Hirsch A, Hernandez P, Rivington R, Road J, Hoffstein V, Hodder R, Marciniuk D, McCormack D, Fox G, Cox G, Prins HB, Ford G, Bleskie D, Doucette S, Mayers I, Chapman K, Zamel N, FitzGerald M; Canadian Thoracic Society/Canadian Respiratory Clinical Research Consortium. Tiotropium in combination with placebo, salmeterol, or fluticasone-salmeterol for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 17;146(8):545-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-8-200704170-00152. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
PMID: 17310045RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alejandra Ramírez-Venegas, M.Cs.
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, "Ismael Cosío Villegas"
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2015
First Posted
June 16, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10