NCT02472197

Brief Summary

Intrauterine pathologies are currently treated by hysteroscopic resection. In this surgical procedure, the intrauterine pathology is resected by a transcervical approach in several fragments using a mono or bipolar cove after distension of the uterine cavity and by endoscopic control. The main risks of this surgery are: uterine perforation and OHIA (operative hysteroscopy intravascular absorption) syndrome. Hysteroscopic morcellators are new intrauterine devices, recently appeared on the French market. In comparison to classical resectors, morcellators have several theoretical advantages:

  • A smaller instrument diameter with potentially a lower risk of uterine perforation and cervical laceration during the dilatation procedure,
  • The use of physiological serum, eliminating the risk of neurological toxicity of glycine,
  • The risk of electrical accident is canceled (internal or external burns due to leakage current),
  • A decreased risk of air embolism, due to the absence of bubbles' production,
  • The instrument is always under visual control, the perforation risk by the active instrument is therefore very limited,
  • The vision is not obscured by the fragments or by the bubbles,
  • The treatment of pre-ostial pathologies, not always easy in classical resections, could be facilitated,
  • the absence of thermal effect, and therefore a potentially lower endometrial aggression, is interesting in women with reproductive desire,
  • Absence of chips management, limiting the entry and exit movements in the uterine cavity, improving the vision, reducing the infectious and traumatic risks, specially uterine perforation and air embolism,
  • Morcellation could preserve tissues for histological analysis of possible malignancy (compared to techniques using heat, coagulation, vaporization),
  • Easy learning in comparison to the time-consuming learning of classical hysteroscopic resection,
  • Generated additional cost could be partly amortized by reducing operating time and complications. It seemed useful to study this new technology. The primary purpose was to compare the time of hysteroscopic treatment of uterine polyps between a hysteroscopic morcellator the UNIDRIVE S III / DrillCut-X II-GYN-Shaver (Integrated Bigatti Shaver IBS), Storz®, and a conventional resectoscope. The secondary purposes were to compare the efficiency, complications and comfort of these techniques.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Endometrial polypHysteroscopic resectionMorcellation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Morcellation or resection time (minutes)

    From the cervical dilatation just before introducing the operative device until removal of the operative device assessed up to 25 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • The completeness of resection or not,

    10 weeks after surgery

  • The total operating time (in minutes):

    from the beginning of diagnostic hysteroscopy to the end of operative hysteroscopy resection and removal of the operative device, assessed up to 25 minutes

  • The amount of serum used (mL)

    At the end of surgery

  • Perioperative complications,

    10 weeks after surgery

  • The quality of vision defined by the operator on a scale of 0 to 5,

    At the end of surgery

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

morcellation

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Hysteroscopic morcellation

standard resection

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Standard hysteroscopic resection

Interventions

The endometrial polyp is resected by a transcervical approach in several chips using a mono or bipolar cove after distension of the uterine cavity under endoscopic control.

standard resection

The endometrial polyp is resected by a transcervical approach. During the procedure, the polyp is placed by suction against the window of the device, then cut by mechanical energy, in chips which are directly aspirated by the device.

morcellation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All major patients with single endometrial polyp,
  • Confirmed by a diagnostic hysteroscopy
  • Greater than or equal to one centimeter in size with no upper size limit
  • Patient giving informed consent
  • Subject belonging to a social security organisme

You may not qualify if:

  • Ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Progressive malignant gynecological pathology
  • Evolutionary Genital infection
  • Suspected malignancy before surgery
  • Multiple Polyps
  • Polypoid hyperplasia
  • Associated submucosal myoma
  • Person under guardianship
  • Patient with contraindication to general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia
  • Inability to give the eprosn informed information (comprehension difficulties ...)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital, Strasbourg, france

Strasbourg, 67000, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Stoll F, Lecointre L, Meyer N, Faller E, Host A, Hummel M, Boisrame T, Akladios C, Garbin O. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):801-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Study Officials

  • Olivier GARBIN, MD

    University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2015

First Posted

June 15, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2018

Study Completion

July 1, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations