Morcellator Versus Resectoscope in the Treatment of Uterine Polyps by Hysteroscopy
RESMO
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intrauterine pathologies are currently treated by hysteroscopic resection. In this surgical procedure, the intrauterine pathology is resected by a transcervical approach in several fragments using a mono or bipolar cove after distension of the uterine cavity and by endoscopic control. The main risks of this surgery are: uterine perforation and OHIA (operative hysteroscopy intravascular absorption) syndrome. Hysteroscopic morcellators are new intrauterine devices, recently appeared on the French market. In comparison to classical resectors, morcellators have several theoretical advantages:
- A smaller instrument diameter with potentially a lower risk of uterine perforation and cervical laceration during the dilatation procedure,
- The use of physiological serum, eliminating the risk of neurological toxicity of glycine,
- The risk of electrical accident is canceled (internal or external burns due to leakage current),
- A decreased risk of air embolism, due to the absence of bubbles' production,
- The instrument is always under visual control, the perforation risk by the active instrument is therefore very limited,
- The vision is not obscured by the fragments or by the bubbles,
- The treatment of pre-ostial pathologies, not always easy in classical resections, could be facilitated,
- the absence of thermal effect, and therefore a potentially lower endometrial aggression, is interesting in women with reproductive desire,
- Absence of chips management, limiting the entry and exit movements in the uterine cavity, improving the vision, reducing the infectious and traumatic risks, specially uterine perforation and air embolism,
- Morcellation could preserve tissues for histological analysis of possible malignancy (compared to techniques using heat, coagulation, vaporization),
- Easy learning in comparison to the time-consuming learning of classical hysteroscopic resection,
- Generated additional cost could be partly amortized by reducing operating time and complications. It seemed useful to study this new technology. The primary purpose was to compare the time of hysteroscopic treatment of uterine polyps between a hysteroscopic morcellator the UNIDRIVE S III / DrillCut-X II-GYN-Shaver (Integrated Bigatti Shaver IBS), Storz®, and a conventional resectoscope. The secondary purposes were to compare the efficiency, complications and comfort of these techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.8 years
June 5, 2015
December 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Morcellation or resection time (minutes)
From the cervical dilatation just before introducing the operative device until removal of the operative device assessed up to 25 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The completeness of resection or not,
10 weeks after surgery
The total operating time (in minutes):
from the beginning of diagnostic hysteroscopy to the end of operative hysteroscopy resection and removal of the operative device, assessed up to 25 minutes
The amount of serum used (mL)
At the end of surgery
Perioperative complications,
10 weeks after surgery
The quality of vision defined by the operator on a scale of 0 to 5,
At the end of surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
morcellation
EXPERIMENTALstandard resection
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The endometrial polyp is resected by a transcervical approach in several chips using a mono or bipolar cove after distension of the uterine cavity under endoscopic control.
The endometrial polyp is resected by a transcervical approach. During the procedure, the polyp is placed by suction against the window of the device, then cut by mechanical energy, in chips which are directly aspirated by the device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All major patients with single endometrial polyp,
- Confirmed by a diagnostic hysteroscopy
- Greater than or equal to one centimeter in size with no upper size limit
- Patient giving informed consent
- Subject belonging to a social security organisme
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Progressive malignant gynecological pathology
- Evolutionary Genital infection
- Suspected malignancy before surgery
- Multiple Polyps
- Polypoid hyperplasia
- Associated submucosal myoma
- Person under guardianship
- Patient with contraindication to general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia
- Inability to give the eprosn informed information (comprehension difficulties ...)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital, Strasbourg, france
Strasbourg, 67000, France
Related Publications (1)
Stoll F, Lecointre L, Meyer N, Faller E, Host A, Hummel M, Boisrame T, Akladios C, Garbin O. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):801-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
PMID: 32681995RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier GARBIN, MD
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2015
First Posted
June 15, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12