Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System vs. Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT)
NPWT
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of a Single-Use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO) Versus a Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT) in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Ulcers
1 other identifier
interventional
164
2 countries
17
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of two types of NPWT systems; the traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) system and the single-use negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 6, 2020
CompletedApril 6, 2020
April 1, 2020
2.4 years
June 10, 2015
June 11, 2019
April 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period
Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the post-debridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.
Baseline through 12 weeks
Percentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period
Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the postdebridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.
Baseline through 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Baseline through 12 weeks
Change in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Baseline through 12 weeks
Percentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Baseline through 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
PICO System
EXPERIMENTALNegative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) at 80mmHg (nominal) +/- 20 mmHg to the wound surface
tNPWT System
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional NPWT (tNPWT) from -25 mmHg and up to -200 mmHg; intensity settings of either low, medium and high; delivery modes of continuous or intermittent. The pressure, intensity and delivery settings will be left to the Investigator's discretion at each study treatment visit.
Interventions
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) at 80mmHg (nominal) +/- 20 mmHg to the wound surface
NPWT from -25 mmHg and up to -200 mmHg; intensity settings of either low, medium and high; delivery modes of continuous or intermittent. The pressure, intensity and delivery settings will be left to the Investigator's discretion at each study treatment visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex
- Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments
- Have a Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 36.0 cm2
- Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months)
- Have a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) present on any part of the plantar or dorsum surface of the foot, with a surface area ≥ 0.5 cm2 and ≤ 10.0 cm2
- Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone
- Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 52 weeks (12 months)
- Acceptable state of health and nutrition
You may not qualify if:
- Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study Ulcers which are deemed as highly exuding, per the Investigator's discretion.
- Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis at the target wound location that is not currently receiving treatment \[Documented history of resolved osteomyelitis is allowed\].
- Subjects with a VLU: Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
- Clinical evidence of target ulcer infection
- Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs.
- Current therapy with chronic (\> 10 days) oral corticosteroids.
- Previous treatment with NPWT device or hyperbaric oxygen within 7 days of screening.
- Malignancy in the target ulcer, or history of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
ILD Consulting, Inc.
Carlsbad, California, 92009, United States
Valley Foot & Ankle Specialty Providers
Fresno, California, 93720, United States
The Sun Healthcare & Surgery Group
Martinez, California, 94553, United States
Center for Clincial Research
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Olive View - UCLA Medical Center
Sylmar, California, 91342, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33125, United States
NW University Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Rosalind Franklin University of Med & Science
North Chicago, Illinois, 60064, United States
Ochsner Health System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Advanced Foot & Ankle
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, United States
Center for Advanced Wound Care
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610, United States
Acclaim Bone & Joint
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Futuro Clinical Trials, LLC
McAllen, Texas, 78501, United States
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, 24013, United States
The Mayer Institute
Hamilton, Ontario, L8R 2R3, Canada
Centre podiatrique et soins des plaies
Boucherville, Quebec, J4B 5E4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There were no known limitations or caveats reported during this study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Natasha Schappell, CCRP
- Organization
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andy Weymann, MD, MBA
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2015
First Posted
June 12, 2015
Study Start
July 2, 2015
Primary Completion
November 14, 2017
Study Completion
November 14, 2017
Last Updated
April 6, 2020
Results First Posted
April 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04