ASD Parent Trainer: Online Coaching for Parents of Children With Autism
APT
1 other identifier
interventional
156
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The evaluation of the program efficacy will be conducted via a randomized control study with 136 parents of children aged 3-8 who have autism. Investigators will test whether, compared to a content comparison group (CC), administration of the APT program over a 3-week intervention period (a) improves child behaviors, (b) increases perceived quality of life, (c) decreases parental stress, (d) increases positive parenting practices, and (e) increases parent knowledge of evidence-based support practices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 5, 2020
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.2 years
June 8, 2015
January 6, 2020
January 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Child Behavior Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 1997)
Examining change over time points (T2-T1) This 25-item parent-report version of a behavioral screening questionnaire has been used with children aged 3 to 16 years of age. It assesses both positive and negative behaviors in the following domains: conduct problems, inattention-hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, peer problems, and pro-social behavior. The SDQ-P has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and is available in Spanish (Goodman, 2001).Total range of scores is from 0 to 50. The prosocial items are reverse scored for the total scale so that on the total scale higher scores indicate worse behaviors.
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)
Family Quality of Life as Measured by Family Quality of Life Survey (Summers et al., 2005)
Examining change over time points (T2-T1) Quality of Life was measured using the Family Quality of Life survey (FQOL; Summers et al., 2005), which is a 25-item measure of the quality of life for a family raising a child with intellectual or developmental disabilities. The outcomes measured are: quality of life in the domains of parenting, emotional well-being, physical/material well-being, and disability-related supports using a 5-point scale with responses ranging from (1) very dissatisfied to (5) very satisfied. The average score on the total scale was used in the analysis. The range is from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more positive outcomes.
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)
Parenting Scale (Arnold, O'Leary, Wolff, & Aker, 1993)
Examining change over time points (T2-T1) Parenting Practices will be assessed using the Parenting Scale (PS; Arnold, O'Leary, Wolff, \& Aker, 1993) a 30-item, 7 point Likert-like scale with three subscales (laxness, over-reactivity, and hostility). The scale has internal consistency for the total scale and subscales (α = .78 and - .83 respectively) and has been evaluated for factor structure and validity (Rhoades \& O'Leary, 2007). The average score on the total scale was used in the analysis with a range of 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating more positive outcomes.
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks),
Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R; Bruininks, Woodcock, Weatherman, & Hill, 1996)
Examining change over time points (T2-T1) The SBI-R is a 40-item, 7-point scale that measures 14 areas of adaptive behaviors and 8 areas of maladaptive behaviors. We used the total adaptive scale with a total range of 0 to 120 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Knowledge About Applied Behavior Analysis and Acceptance Commitment Training Measured by Questionnaire
Pre (0 weeks), Post (3 weeks)
Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire
Follow up (6 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Autism Parent Trainer (APT)
EXPERIMENTALPracticed Routines was a facilitated program. It was organized into four modules that included a total of seven videos ranging from 3-13 minutes each. The topics overlapped with those in the TR program, but included more explicit information on function-based strategies, as well as mindfulness practice. Participants were assigned six fillable forms, and provided supplemental data collection tools. Additional resources focused on mindfulness and PBS within family routines. Eighteen brief guided audio meditations were available to participants via the Practiced MindTM mobile application. The meditations focused on bringing the parents' awareness to both internal and external experiences and helping them act intentionally.
Teaching Routines (Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORTeaching Routines was entirely self-directed. The program included eight modules with videos for each ranging 3 - 5 minutes in duration. The topics were antecedent-behavior-consequence method, creating task analyses, antecedent-based strategies, communication, reinforcement, teaching methods, and overcoming obstacles. Participants were assigned six activities using fillable forms and provided additional resources including examples, a glossary of terms, and a list of websites. No feedback was given to the parents apart from the automated completion responses. The participants were given access to the TR LMS for the duration of the study, but post and follow-up assessments were completed at 6 and 10 weeks (i.e., same as the PR condition).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents of children aged 3-8 who have autism
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- IRIS Media Inclead
Study Sites (1)
IRIS Educational Media
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The most significant limitation of this study was that it was underpowered for a content comparison study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jordan Pennefather
- Organization
- Trifoia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nell Caraway, BA
IRIS Educational Media
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meme Hieneman, Ph.D., BCBA
IRIS Educational Media
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2015
First Posted
June 12, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 30, 2017
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Results First Posted
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01