NCT02466841

Brief Summary

Compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (cubital tunnel syndrome) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity (carpal tunnel is the most common). Patients who fail conservative treatment (activity modification, splinting, medications) are offered cubital tunnel release. There are multiple techniques to decompress the ulnar nerve at the elbow, but the ideal release has not been determined. These techniques vary from simple decompression of the nerve (in-situ release, endoscopic release), to decompressing the nerve and moving it anteriorly to take tension off the nerve (subcutaneous transposition, sub-fascial transposition, sub muscular transposition), and removing part of the medial epicondyle (medial epicondylectomy). Each procedure has purported benefits and also potential complications. Simple in-situ release has the benefit of shorter operative times and less surgical dissection, however, the nerve may subluxate post-operatively and cause persistent pain. Procedures to move the nerve (subcutaneous transposition, sub-fascial transposition, sub muscular transposition) prevent subluxation and take tension off the nerve, however, they require more dissection, larger incisions, and also partially devascularize the nerve. Medial epicondylectomy prevents subluxation and decompresses the nerve, but some patients may have a prolonged recovery and persistent pain from removing part of the bone. The purpose of this study is to prospective evaluate patients undergoing cubital tunnel release according to the standard practice and preference of their surgeon. The investigators plan to compare the different techniques at standard post-operative intervals.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2015

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2015

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

June 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient rated ulnar nerve evaluation (PRUNE) score

    The PRUNE is a validated patient rated outcome measurement to assess pain, symptoms and functional disability in patients with ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Elbow Range of Motion

    1 year

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

    1 year

  • 2 Point Discrimination Test

    1 year

  • Hand Dynamometer to measure Grip Strength

    1 year

  • Number of subjects with post-surgical complications

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Patients undergoing cubital tunnel release surgery

Patients undergoing cubital tunnel release surgery will be enrolled. All enrolled subjects will be followed regardless of the technique used by surgeon.

Procedure: Cubital tunnel release

Interventions

Patients undergoing cubital tunnel release for ulnar nerve compression at elbow

Patients undergoing cubital tunnel release surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing cubital tunnel release

You may qualify if:

  • patients indicated to surgery by attending surgeon

You may not qualify if:

  • previous cubital tunnel release on ipsilateral side
  • unable/unwilling to provide consent
  • pregnant women
  • prisoners
  • \< 18 years of age

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Palmer BA, Hughes TB. Cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.004.

    PMID: 20117320BACKGROUND
  • Osei DA, Padegimas EM, Calfee RP, Gelberman RH. Outcomes following modified oblique medial epicondylectomy for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Feb;38(2):336-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

    PMID: 23291082BACKGROUND
  • MacDermid JC, Grewal R. Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 26;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-146.

    PMID: 23617407BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ulnar NeuropathiesMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesUlnar Nerve Compression SyndromesNerve Compression SyndromesCumulative Trauma DisordersSprains and StrainsWounds and Injuries
0

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2015

First Posted

June 9, 2015

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04