Efficacy of Higher Cutting Rate in Microincision Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
1 other identifier
observational
326
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The medical records of 393 eyes of 326 patients with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy were reviewed. Higher cutting rate instruments (5000 cut per minute) were used in 174 eyes and conventional instruments in 219 eyes (2500 cut per minute). The visual outcome and incidences of intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2007
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2015
CompletedJune 8, 2015
June 1, 2015
6.9 years
June 2, 2015
June 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual acuity
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Retinal reattachment
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Higher cutting rate group
Vitrectomy with higher cutting rate instruments (5000 cut per minute) were performed in 174 eyes for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Conventional cutting rate group
Vitrectomy with conventional instruments (2500 cut per minute) were performed in 219 eyes for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Interventions
25-gauge vitrectomy
Eligibility Criteria
The patients who underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy with higher cutting rate instruments or conventional instruments
You may not qualify if:
- The eyes with follow-up less than 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Makoto Inoue
Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kyorin Eye center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2015
First Posted
June 8, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 8, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06