Impact of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Staging
PET MUSE
1 other identifier
interventional
292
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in Canada and there has been relatively little progress in altering its clinical course over the last three decades. One of the major problems identified in the management of this disease, is under staging of muscle invasive disease which can lead to suboptimal treatment and outcomes. PET-CT has the potential to more accurately stage MIBC than standard CT by detecting pelvic adenopathy and/or distant sites of disease that may not be found on standard imaging. In the former situation, more aggressive therapy with extended lymph node dissection and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to cystectomy can be offered. While in the latter situation patients can be spared the morbidity of a cystectomy performed in a setting of metastatic disease. This study will address whether PET-CT adds a clinically meaningful difference in care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2024
CompletedNovember 22, 2024
November 1, 2024
7.9 years
May 27, 2015
November 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment received
For patients with planned cystectomy, treatment received includes: avoidance of planned cystectomy and node dissection, an extended (vs standard) node dissection (or standard dissection when extended is the surgeon's usual practice), use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (vs no neoadjuvant chemotherapy). For patients with planned bladder conservation, treatment received includes: avoidance of bladder and nodal radiation (vs bladder only or no radiation) and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (or not).
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Disease-free survival
5 years
Overall survival
5 years
Quality of life analysis
5 years
Health economic analysis
5 years
Other Outcomes (2)
Change in planned management
5 years
Clinical and pathology response to chemotherapy using interim response of FDG PET-CT after 2 cycles of chemotherapy
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Whole-body FDG PET-CT
EXPERIMENTALWhole-body FDG PET-CT (Experimental arm)
No PET-CT
NO INTERVENTIONNo PET-CT (Control arm)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women with newly diagnosed muscle-invasive high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (TNM stage T2a-T4a, N0-3, M0), who are eligible for either radical cystectomy or radiotherapy-based bladder conservation.
- Being considered for treatment of curative intent.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years.
- ECOG performance status \>2.
- Predominant histology (\>50% of specimen) involves non-urothelial cell carcinoma.
- Prior partial cystectomy.
- Prior pelvis surgery that obviates a completed extended lymphadenectomy (e.g., aorto-femoral/iliac bypass) or for whom the surgeon feels that their ability to perform a standard or extended pelvic node dissection would be compromised.
- Contraindications to FDG PET-CT.
- Inability to lie supine for imaging with PET-CT.
- Inadequate hepatic function:
- (i) Bilirubin \>1.5 X ULN and (ii) SGOT and Alkaline phosphatase \>3 X ULN
- History of another invasive malignancy within the previous 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer.
- Known pregnancy or lactating female.
- Inability to complete the study or required follow-up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)lead
- Cancer Care Ontariocollaborator
Study Sites (6)
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2, Canada
London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4, Canada
Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Srikala Sridhar, MD
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Power, MD
LHSC-Victoria Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Som Mukherjee, MD
Juravinski Cancer Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ur Metser, MD
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mark Levine, MD
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2015
First Posted
June 4, 2015
Study Start
May 6, 2016
Primary Completion
March 31, 2024
Study Completion
November 14, 2024
Last Updated
November 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share