CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE ON TIME TO FIRST ANALGESIC REQUIREMENT
CaBuMorph
EFFECT OF CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE ON TIME TO FIRST ANALGESIC REQUIREMENT IN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL PATIENTS; A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is a subjective sensation which in children can only be experienced and most times not expressed. Pain management in children thus falls short of their adult counterparts. Acute pain of surgery causes significant suffering and stress. In children, pain management has lagged behind because of the belief that children's pain receptors are less well developed than their adult counterparts. However this has been proven to be false as development of pain receptors has been shown by 26th week of gestation. Caudal analgesia with plain bupivacaine has been used for effective post operative analgesia. Resources sometimes limit acquisition of additives to bupivacaine to be delivered into the intrathecal space. The fear of pharmacological adverse effects of opioids has restricted their use especially among the anesthesia officers who deliver the bulk of anesthesia services in Uganda and this has led to poor pain management in pediatric populations Mulago national referral hospital is a resource limited centre with regards to human resource, equipment and drugs. This is mainly due to lack of sufficient funds and large volume of patients with the nursing staff being overwhelmed by the patient capacity. Drug administration is often not done on time and continuous assessment of pain scores in children is not adequate resulting in poor post operative pain management. Pain control thus will depend on analgesia provided at the time of operation creating a need for prolonged pain control measures. Studies done have compared intravenous morphine administration versus caudal analgesia and are mostly focused of sub umbilical surgery however none has been done in our setting. Bupivacaine and morphine are now more readily available and can be used for post operative analgesia. However studies on the timing to the next analgesic requirement have not been compared/done in Mulago national referral hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 11, 2016
May 1, 2015
3 months
May 25, 2015
April 8, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
time to first analgesic requirement
time from intervention to pain score of 4
24 hours
Post- operative pain scores of the patients using age appropriate scales.
comparing the pain scores of the patients using the FLACC and the CRIES pain tools
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse effects reactions of the intravenous morphine analgesia and caudal analgesia
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
caudal bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTAL1ml/kg of 0.125% caudal bupivacaine given over 2 minutes will be given at the end of surgery
intravenous morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.05mg/kg intravenous morphine given over 5 minutes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- All American Society of Anesthesia (ASA )I and II patients aged less than 8years undergoing elective abdominal perineal and lower limb orthopedic surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to opioids Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mulago Hospital Complex
Kampala, Kampala, 256, Uganda
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
EZRA MUGISHA, MBChB
makerere university college of health sciences department of anesthesia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2015
First Posted
May 28, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-05