Airway Inflammation in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Patients
Investigation of Airway Inflammation in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We propose to examine Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) patients for evidence of airway inflammation as a first step to characterize the reported bronchodilator responsiveness. Airway biopsy studies are invasive and thus we propose to perform induced sputum studies to document the amount and type of inflammation present. Another ancillary non-invasive measure of airway inflammation that we will use is exhaled nitric oxide (NO). The primary objective of this study is to determine if CDH patients have any evidence of airway inflammation. The hypothesis of this study is that children with CDH do not have evidence of airway inflammation associated with bronchodilator responsiveness. Based on this information, treatment for CDH patients will hopefully be more accurate and appropriate for their specific needs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 31, 2019
August 1, 2018
1.7 years
May 21, 2015
October 6, 2017
August 15, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Elevated Sputum Eosinophils
Number of participants with sputum eosinophils greater than 3% percent of cells in the sputum
post sputum induction
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participant With Elevated Sputum Neutrophils
Baseline, +30 minutes
Number of Participant With Elevated Exhaled Nitric Oxide (NO) Level
30 min
Number of Participant With Bronchodilator Response
life time of child (age 6 to present age)
Study Arms (1)
Hypersaline and Bronchodilator Response
EXPERIMENTALAfter the subject has performed post-bronchodilator spirometry, they will inhale 5 mls of 3% hypertonic saline for 7 minutes by nebulizer.
Interventions
Subject will inhale 5 mls of 3% hypertonic saline for 7 minutes by nebulizer. Sputum production (with cough) will be attempted post inhalation. A maximum of 3 hypertonic saline inhalations will be attempted if inhalation does not generate a productive cough. If sputum induction is not successful and the FEV1 falls \<10%, the concentration of inhaled hypertonic saline will increase from 3 to 4%. If 5 mls of 4% hypertonic saline inhaled for 7 minutes does not produce a productive cough we will proceed to 5%. If 5 mls of 5% hypertonic saline inhaled for 7 minutes does not produce a productive cough the test is complete and the sample is labelled 'no sputum collected'. If FEV1 falls \>10%, the previous step will be repeated.
A bronchodilator (Salbutamol 200 mcg or 2 puffs inhaled via spacer device) will be administered to all subjects in the pulmonary function laboratory. 15 minutes after administration of the bronchodilator spirometry will be repeated. This is performed routinely in CDH clinic and is not an additional test for this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age at enrolment
- Clinically stable at enrolment
- Attending follow-up in the CDH Clinic at SickKids
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to perform pulmonary function testing
- Clinically unstable at enrolment
- Known hypersensitivity to salbutamol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Theo Moraes
- Organization
- SickKids
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theo Moraes, MD
The Hospital for Sick Children
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Respirologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2015
First Posted
May 25, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Results First Posted
January 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-08