Compare Endoscopic and Open Methods of Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Comparative Results of Endoscopic and Open Methods of Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: a Prospective Randomized Parallel-group Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
228
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
There is no shared vision relating to integrity and quality of the conduit after the impact on the vein wall during vein harvesting. In this connection, the investigators studied the initial state of the venous conduit, interoperation damages of the vein and postoperative wound complications while using two methods of GSV harvesting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2015
CompletedMay 18, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.9 years
May 13, 2015
May 15, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative wound complications
all cases postoperative wound complications
during 30 day after operation
Study Arms (2)
Open vein harvesting
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with IHD, who were underwent open vein harvest method (OVH)
Endoscopic vein harvesting
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with IHD, who were underwent edoscopic vein harvestingopen vein harvest method (EVH).
Interventions
Open vein harvesting was performed as a continuous incision under vision control. The GSV was identified two fingers proximal to the medial malleolus according to the standard practice. The vein was harvested using Metzenbaum scissors, and a continuous incision was made along the route of the vein. Care was taken not to traumatize the nerve, vein or its branches. Vein branches were ligated with titanium clips. The wound was closed in layers with continuous 2-0 Polysorb sutures and 3-0 skin sutures.
Endoscopic vein harvesting was performed through minimal incisions with use of Vasoview 6 system (Maquet Medical Systems, Wayne, NJ, USA.) The vein was identified through a 3 cm incision below the knee. The incision site was sealed using a balloon port to create a tunnel inside the leg. A second unit with cautery was inserted via the port to cut and seal the tributary branches. A 1 cm skin incision was made near the groin to ligate the distal end of the GSV and remove the vein, which was checked for leakage. The wound was closed with 3-0 skin sutures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- subjects with multivascular lesion of the coronary artery to whom coronary artery bypass surgery was indicated.
You may not qualify if:
- urgent coronary artery bypass surgery with unstable haemodynamics;
- previous coronary artery bypass surgery;
- chronic venous insufficiency С4-С6 under СЕAR classification;
- previous limb surgeries.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2015
First Posted
May 18, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05