Trial of Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Use in Conflict-related Extremity Wounds
VACoCREW
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Negative-pressure Wound Therapy Use in Conflict-related Extremity Wounds (VACoCREW Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
116
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
There is a treatment method called negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) that is well established and used for the treatment of wounds. The method involves the application of a wound dressing through which a negative pressure is applied. Due to a plastic film overlaying the wound the risk of wound contamination is reduced. NPWT is considered to promote wound healing and prevent infection and has previously been used in the treatment of acute war associated wounds with satisfactory results. The aim of this study is to compare NPWT with conventional wound dressings in the treatment of war-associated extremity wounds and evaluate which method is more effective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 11, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.3 years
May 12, 2015
March 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Early wound closure
Wound closure, either by suture or split-thickness skin graft
Day five +-1
Cost-effectiveness comparing outcomes from NPWT and standard treatment
Costs from the health care provider's perspective will be used. Cost-effectiveness will be expressed in US dollars.
Days (between 1 and 50)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Rate of wound healing
Days (between 1 and 50)
Wound infection
Days (between 1 and 50)
Time until wound is deemed no longer requiring professional care
Days (between 1 and 50)
Time to discharge
Days (between 1 and 50)
Quality of life aspects
Days five and eight
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Negative-pressure wound therapy
EXPERIMENTALVaccum Assisted Closure device. Patients will receive negative-pressure wound therapy according to manufacturer treatment guidelines.
Standard
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be treated with conventional wound dressings according to local treatment protocols.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥ 18 years of age with extremity blast- or gunshot-wound(s). In case of multiple wounds the extremity wound with the estimated largest area is selected.
You may not qualify if:
- Wounds presenting \>72 hours following initial trauma.
- Wounds that are considered ready for primary closure by suture or split-thickness skin graft.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlandscollaborator
- Jordan University of Science and Technologycollaborator
- Stockholm South General Hospitalcollaborator
- Center for Molecular Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Emergency Hospital
Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Ar Ramtha Hospital
Ar Ramtha, Jordan
Related Publications (19)
Aboutanos MB, Baker SP. Wartime civilian injuries: epidemiology and intervention strategies. J Trauma. 1997 Oct;43(4):719-26. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00031.
PMID: 9356079RESULTOwens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Macaitis J, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC. Characterization of extremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):254-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802f78fb.
PMID: 17414553RESULTFares Y, El-Zaatari M, Fares J, Bedrosian N, Yared N. Trauma-related infections due to cluster munitions. J Infect Public Health. 2013 Dec;6(6):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
PMID: 23999350RESULTCovey DC, Lurate RB, Hatton CT. Field hospital treatment of blast wounds of the musculoskeletal system during the Yugoslav civil war. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 May;14(4):278-86; discussion 277. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200005000-00010.
PMID: 10898201RESULTKrug E, Berg L, Lee C, Hudson D, Birke-Sorensen H, Depoorter M, Dunn R, Jeffery S, Duteille F, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Dowsett C, Ferreira F, Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Vig S, Runkel N, Martin R, Smith J; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP]. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury. 2011 Feb;42 Suppl 1:S1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)00041-6.
PMID: 21316515RESULTMachen S. Management of traumatic war wounds using vacuum-assisted closure dressings in an austere environment. US Army Med Dep J. 2007 Jan-Mar:17-23.
PMID: 20084702RESULTPeck MA, Clouse WD, Cox MW, Bowser AN, Eliason JL, Jenkins DH, Smith DL, Rasmussen TE. The complete management of extremity vascular injury in a local population: a wartime report from the 332nd Expeditionary Medical Group/Air Force Theater Hospital, Balad Air Base, Iraq. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1197-204; discussion 1204-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.003.
PMID: 17543685RESULTLeininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL, Jenkins DH, Coppola C. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1207-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000241150.15342.da.
PMID: 17099530RESULTUbbink DT, Westerbos SJ, Evans D, Land L, Vermeulen H. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001898.pub2.
PMID: 18646080RESULTWebster J, Scuffham P, Stankiewicz M, Chaboyer WP. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 7;(10):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub3.
PMID: 25287701RESULTPeinemann F, Sauerland S. Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jun;108(22):381-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0381. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
PMID: 21712971RESULTBovill E, Banwell PE, Teot L, Eriksson E, Song C, Mahoney J, Gustafsson R, Horch R, Deva A, Whitworth I; International Advisory Panel on Topical Negative Pressure. Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds. Int Wound J. 2008 Oct;5(4):511-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00437.x. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
PMID: 18808432RESULTHinck D, Franke A, Gatzka F. Use of vacuum-assisted closure negative pressure wound therapy in combat-related injuries--literature review. Mil Med. 2010 Mar;175(3):173-81. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00075.
PMID: 20358706RESULTKrasner DL. Managing wound pain in patients with vacuum-assisted closure devices. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 May;48(5):38-43.
PMID: 12046489RESULTArgenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):563-76; discussion 577.
PMID: 9188971RESULTHaque G, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Malmstedt J, Alga A. Impact of injury mechanism on early wound closure in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: A prospective cohort analysis from two civilian hospitals in Iraq and Jordan. World J Surg. 2024 Aug;48(8):1822-1828. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12276. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
PMID: 38970237DERIVEDAlga A, Lofgren J, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Forsberg BC, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment of acute conflict-related extremity wounds within a randomized controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 10;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00415-1.
PMID: 35144650DERIVEDAlga A, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Lundgren KC, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: a pragmatic, multisite, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e423-e429. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30547-9.
PMID: 32087175DERIVEDAlga A, Wong S, Haweizy R, Conneryd Lundgren K, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 26;7(11):e12334. doi: 10.2196/12334.
PMID: 30478024DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonas Malmstedt, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2015
First Posted
May 14, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03