NCT02444598

Brief Summary

There is a treatment method called negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) that is well established and used for the treatment of wounds. The method involves the application of a wound dressing through which a negative pressure is applied. Due to a plastic film overlaying the wound the risk of wound contamination is reduced. NPWT is considered to promote wound healing and prevent infection and has previously been used in the treatment of acute war associated wounds with satisfactory results. The aim of this study is to compare NPWT with conventional wound dressings in the treatment of war-associated extremity wounds and evaluate which method is more effective.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
116

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2015

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 8, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

woundsnegative-pressure wound therapyconflictgunshot woundblast injuriescivilianwar

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Early wound closure

    Wound closure, either by suture or split-thickness skin graft

    Day five +-1

  • Cost-effectiveness comparing outcomes from NPWT and standard treatment

    Costs from the health care provider's perspective will be used. Cost-effectiveness will be expressed in US dollars.

    Days (between 1 and 50)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Rate of wound healing

    Days (between 1 and 50)

  • Wound infection

    Days (between 1 and 50)

  • Time until wound is deemed no longer requiring professional care

    Days (between 1 and 50)

  • Time to discharge

    Days (between 1 and 50)

  • Quality of life aspects

    Days five and eight

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Negative-pressure wound therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Vaccum Assisted Closure device. Patients will receive negative-pressure wound therapy according to manufacturer treatment guidelines.

Device: Vaccum Assisted Closure device

Standard

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be treated with conventional wound dressings according to local treatment protocols.

Procedure: Conventional wound dressings

Interventions

Negative-pressure wound therapy

Negative-pressure wound therapy

Conventional wound dressings

Standard

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age with extremity blast- or gunshot-wound(s). In case of multiple wounds the extremity wound with the estimated largest area is selected.

You may not qualify if:

  • Wounds presenting \>72 hours following initial trauma.
  • Wounds that are considered ready for primary closure by suture or split-thickness skin graft.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Emergency Hospital

Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Location

Ar Ramtha Hospital

Ar Ramtha, Jordan

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Aboutanos MB, Baker SP. Wartime civilian injuries: epidemiology and intervention strategies. J Trauma. 1997 Oct;43(4):719-26. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00031.

  • Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Macaitis J, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC. Characterization of extremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):254-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802f78fb.

  • Fares Y, El-Zaatari M, Fares J, Bedrosian N, Yared N. Trauma-related infections due to cluster munitions. J Infect Public Health. 2013 Dec;6(6):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

  • Covey DC, Lurate RB, Hatton CT. Field hospital treatment of blast wounds of the musculoskeletal system during the Yugoslav civil war. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 May;14(4):278-86; discussion 277. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200005000-00010.

  • Krug E, Berg L, Lee C, Hudson D, Birke-Sorensen H, Depoorter M, Dunn R, Jeffery S, Duteille F, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Dowsett C, Ferreira F, Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Vig S, Runkel N, Martin R, Smith J; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP]. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury. 2011 Feb;42 Suppl 1:S1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)00041-6.

  • Machen S. Management of traumatic war wounds using vacuum-assisted closure dressings in an austere environment. US Army Med Dep J. 2007 Jan-Mar:17-23.

  • Peck MA, Clouse WD, Cox MW, Bowser AN, Eliason JL, Jenkins DH, Smith DL, Rasmussen TE. The complete management of extremity vascular injury in a local population: a wartime report from the 332nd Expeditionary Medical Group/Air Force Theater Hospital, Balad Air Base, Iraq. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1197-204; discussion 1204-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.003.

  • Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL, Jenkins DH, Coppola C. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1207-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000241150.15342.da.

  • Ubbink DT, Westerbos SJ, Evans D, Land L, Vermeulen H. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001898.pub2.

  • Webster J, Scuffham P, Stankiewicz M, Chaboyer WP. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 7;(10):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub3.

  • Peinemann F, Sauerland S. Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jun;108(22):381-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0381. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

  • Bovill E, Banwell PE, Teot L, Eriksson E, Song C, Mahoney J, Gustafsson R, Horch R, Deva A, Whitworth I; International Advisory Panel on Topical Negative Pressure. Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds. Int Wound J. 2008 Oct;5(4):511-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00437.x. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

  • Hinck D, Franke A, Gatzka F. Use of vacuum-assisted closure negative pressure wound therapy in combat-related injuries--literature review. Mil Med. 2010 Mar;175(3):173-81. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00075.

  • Krasner DL. Managing wound pain in patients with vacuum-assisted closure devices. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 May;48(5):38-43.

  • Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):563-76; discussion 577.

  • Haque G, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Malmstedt J, Alga A. Impact of injury mechanism on early wound closure in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: A prospective cohort analysis from two civilian hospitals in Iraq and Jordan. World J Surg. 2024 Aug;48(8):1822-1828. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12276. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

  • Alga A, Lofgren J, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Forsberg BC, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment of acute conflict-related extremity wounds within a randomized controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 10;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00415-1.

  • Alga A, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Lundgren KC, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: a pragmatic, multisite, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e423-e429. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30547-9.

  • Alga A, Wong S, Haweizy R, Conneryd Lundgren K, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Treatment of Adult Patients With Conflict-Related Extremity Wounds: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 26;7(11):e12334. doi: 10.2196/12334.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds, GunshotArm InjuriesLeg InjuriesWound InfectionWounds and InjuriesBlast Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds, PenetratingInfectionsBarotrauma

Study Officials

  • Jonas Malmstedt, MD, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2015

First Posted

May 14, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 1, 2018

Study Completion

January 1, 2019

Last Updated

March 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations