NCT02444429

Brief Summary

Renal transplantation represents currently the best therapeutic alternative for end-stage renal failure, not only in terms of patient outcomes (better quality of life and longer survival), but also in terms of costs for the society. Progress achieved in the last 20 years has resulted in a drastic reduction of the incidence of "classic" (i.e. clinically patent) acute cellular rejection episodes. Unfortunately, and rather unexpectedly, this progress has had hardly any effect on the frequency of the loss of kidney transplants beyond the first year, as shown by the stagnation of grafts' half lives. Furthermore, the use of immunosuppressant combinations that are more and more powerful has an impact on adverse effects in recipients, including an increased incidence of infections, cancers, but also metabolic complications (diabetes, osteoporosis, dyslipidemia, etc.), which are cause of significant morbi-mortality. In an attempt to improve on these disappointing outcomes, some teams have offered to perform screening biopsies: i.e. routine biopsies at specific time points during the follow up, irrespective of graft function. Their primary interest is to allow a pathological analysis of the graft at an early stage, i.e. when potential histological lesions allow for a diagnosis but before these lesions impact on graft's function. Indeed, it has been clearly demonstrated that therapeutic adjustments intended to protect the grafts are most effective when introduced early. There is a fairly broad consensus to perform these biopsies three months and one year after the transplantation. Performing screening biopsies has led to the identification of "subclinical" forms of rejection, i.e. graft infiltration by recipient immune effectors meeting the Banff histological criteria, but without increase in creatininemia. Assuming that about 10% of screening biopsies performed at 3 months reveal a subclinical rejection, which needs to be treated, the management strategy for the remaining 90% of patients, whose biopsies show either i) a mild inflammatory infiltrates: i.e. "borderline changes", or ii) the complete absence of immune effectors in the graft is, poorly standardized. The investigators therefore propose to conduct a prospective randomized trial to answer these questions simultaneously by evaluating a strategy to optimize the immunosuppression of renal graft recipients based on the presence or absence of subclinical intragraft inflammatory infiltrates in the screening biopsy performed at 3 months post transplantation. Patients with borderline changes (sub-study A) will be randomized to receive a treatment for rejection (corticosteroid boluses). Patients without inflammation in their graft (sub-study B) will be randomized for corticosteroid withdrawal. Impact on graft function, progression of histological lesions and incidence of morbidity will be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
346

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 25, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2015

Completed
8.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 21, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 21, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8.8 years

First QC Date

March 25, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Screening renal biopsyImmunosuppression

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evolution of graft inflammatory lesions

    Interstitial infiltrate (i) and tubulitis (t) will be scored at 3 months and 1 year post transplantation using Banff classification (patients will be recruted 3 months after transplantation) A) Patient with "borderline" infiltrates at 3 months will be randomized to receive a treatment for rejection (sub-study A), with the aim of demonstrating the superiority of this strategy in terms of infiltrates involution (superiority study). B) Patient without significant infiltrates at 3 months will be randomized for maintenance corticotherapy withdrawal (sub-study B), with the aim of showing that this strategy does not cause an increase in the percentage of "borderline" infiltrates compared to the strategy that maintains the corticotherapy (non-inferiority study).

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Graft function at 1 year post-transplantation

    9 months

  • Graft function at 1 year post-transplantation

    9 months

  • Evolution of chronic histological lesions

    9 months

  • Evolution of chronic histological lesions

    9 months

  • Evaluation of the immunological risk associated with the different strategies of corticosteroid treatment adaptation

    9 months

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Sub-study A experimental arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This experimental arm corresponds to patients with "borderline" infiltrates at 3 months, who will be randomized to receive a treatment for rejection (intensification of the corticotherapy with corticosteroid boluses = Corticosteroid boluses Methylprednisolone )

Drug: Corticosteroid boluses Methylprednisolone

Sub-study A control arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This control arm corresponds to patients with "borderline" infiltrates at 3 months, who will be randomized to not change their immunosuppressive treatment (No therapeutic modification)

Other: No therapeutic modification

Sub-study B experimental arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This experimental arm corresponds to patients without significant infiltrates 3 months, who will be randomized to stop maintenance corticotherapy (Stop maintenance corticotherapy )

Other: Stop maintenance corticotherapy

Sub-study B control arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This control arm corresponds to patients without significant infiltrates 3 months, who will be randomized to not change their immunosuppressive treatment (No therapeutic modification)

Other: No therapeutic modification

Interventions

Intensification of the corticotherapy in accordance with the validated protocol for the treatment of "classic" and subclinical acute rejections: 3 bolus Methylprednisolone 500 mg IV at D1, D2 and D3 then decreasing during 10-15 days at 1mg/kg/d and down to the maintenance dose. An anti-pneumocystis and anti-CMV prophylaxis will be systemically introduced for 3 months. The rest of maintenance immunosuppressive regimen (mycophenolate mofetil and anti-calcineurin) will remain unaltered

Sub-study A experimental arm

No therapeutic modification: continuation of the corticotherapy at the maintenance dose and maintaining unaltered the rest of immunosuppressive treatment (mycophenolate mofetil and anti-calcineurin).

Sub-study A control armSub-study B control arm

Immediate withdrawal of maintenance corticotherapy. Maintaining unaltered the rest of immunosuppressive treatment (mycophenolate mofetil and anti-calcineurin).

Sub-study B experimental arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Common to both sub-studies (A and B)
  • Renal transplant patient aged between 18 and 75.
  • Patient who received a first or second renal graft
  • Immunosuppressive treatment consisting of an anti-calcineurin \[cyclosporine (trough levels: 150\<T0\<300)\], or tacrolimus (trough levels: 8\<T0\<12), mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.
  • Patient who benefited from a screening renal biopsy 3 months after the graft
  • Patient who gave their informed consent
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or being a beneficiary of such a scheme
  • Specific to sub-study A
  • Presence of "borderline" inflammatory infiltrates on the screening biopsy at 3 months as defined by the Banff classification 2013:
  • Absence of vascular lesions (v0) and:
  • tubulitis regardless of its significance (t1-3) with minimum interstitial infiltrate (i0-i1) OR
  • interstitial infiltrates (i2-3) without significant tubulitis (≤ t1)
  • Specific to sub-study B Absence of significant inflammatory infiltrates (i0-1 and t0) on the screening biopsy at 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Common to both sub-studies (A and B)
  • Histological subclinical rejection criteria on the screening biopsy at 3 months (Banff 2009: \> i2+t2)
  • Donor specific antibodies in historical serum or de novo appearance during the first 3 months
  • Humoral lesions on the 3-month biopsy (Banff score g+ptc\>2)
  • "Classic" acute rejection episode proven by biopsy during the first 3 months
  • Multiorgan transplantation
  • rd (or subsequent) renal transplantation
  • BK virus-associated nephropathy on the screening biopsy
  • Contraindication to the 1-year screening biopsy
  • Specific to sub-study B Initial nephropathy with a high risk of recurrence on corticosteroid withdrawal: segmental and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, lupus nephritis, vasculitis, or membranous glomerulonephritis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Service de Néphrologie,Transplantation, Dialyse I - Hôpital Pellegrin - CHU Bordeaux

Bordeaux, 33000, France

Location

Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Transplantations Rénales - Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche - CHU de Brest

Brest, 29609, France

Location

Service de Néphrologie - Hôpital Claude Huriez - CHU de Lille

Lille, 59037, France

Location

Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation et Immunologie Clinique - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Institut de Transplantation, Urologie et Néphrologie (ITUN) - CHU de Nantes

Nantes, 44093, France

Location

Service de Transplantation - Hôpital Universitaire Necker

Paris, 75015, France

Location

Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation - Nouvel Hôpital Civil - CHRU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, 67091, France

Location

Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes - Hôpital Rangueil - CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, 31059, France

Location

Study Officials

  • Olivier THAUNAT, MD

    Hospices Civils de Lyon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2015

First Posted

May 14, 2015

Study Start

September 2, 2015

Primary Completion

June 21, 2024

Study Completion

June 21, 2024

Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations