Prediction of Volume Responsiveness in Presence of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction
Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Presence of Diastolic Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ability of the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) for prediction of fluid responsiveness in presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is still unknown. The aim of the present study was to challenge the predictive power of GEDVI, SVV and PPV in cardiac surgery patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedMay 12, 2015
May 1, 2015
11 months
April 28, 2015
May 7, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Increase in stroke volume index (SVI) >15%
In presence of an increase of SVI \>15% during PLR and/or 500 ml crystalloids, patients are defined as responders.
Patients will be obtained until the end of the operation, an expected average of 5 hours
Study Arms (7)
Passive leg raising
OTHERpremedication
OTHERintubation and mechanical ventilation
OTHERcentral venous catheter
OTHERarterial catheter
OTHERContinuous monitoring is performed including electrocardiogram, radial arterial pressure catheter
transesophageal echocardiography
OTHERtranspulmonary thermodilution catheter
OTHERInterventions
The passive leg raising maneuver (PLR) involves a leg elevation up to 45° with the trunk in a horizontal position and is performed to induce hemodynamic effects by a volume challenge, turning unstressed blood volume to stressed volume proportional to body size.
After induction of anesthesia with sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg) and propofol (1.5 mg/kg), orotracheal intubation is facilitated with rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia is maintained with sufentanil (1 µg/kg/h) and propofol (3 mg/kg/h) and patients are ventilated with an oxygen/air mixture in volume-controlled mode, using a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg related to the ideal body weight. Positive end-expiratory pressure is set at 5 cmH2O.
a central venous catheter in the right or left internal jugular vein.
Continuous monitoring is performed including electrocardiogram, radial arterial pressure catheter
Before placement of a transpulmonary thermodilution catheter a transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is performed. TOE is used to detect diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle and to exclude right ventricular dysfunction.
In presence of left ventricular dysfunction a transpulmonary thermodilution catheter is placed in the femoral artery and connected to a PiCCO2 monitor (PiCCO2, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 18 yrs of age
- Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥0.5
- Patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency procedures
- Right ventricular dysfunction
- Hemodynamic instability requiring pharmacologic Support
- Ongoing arrhythmia
- Intracardiac Shunts
- Severe mitral stenosis or insufficiency
- Aortic aneurysm \> 4 cm
- Use of an artificial left ventricular assist device or intra - aortic balloon pump.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ole Broch
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105, Germany
Related Publications (9)
Rex S, Schalte G, Schroth S, de Waal EE, Metzelder S, Overbeck Y, Rossaint R, Buhre W. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Oct;51(9):1258-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01423.x. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
PMID: 17714575BACKGROUNDHofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):848-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.848.
PMID: 16100177BACKGROUNDMarik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
PMID: 19602972BACKGROUNDRenner J, Gruenewald M, Brand P, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Lutter G, Bein B. Global end-diastolic volume as a variable of fluid responsiveness during acute changing loading conditions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Oct;21(5):650-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
PMID: 17905268BACKGROUNDMonnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1402-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215453.11735.06.
PMID: 16540963BACKGROUNDOsman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F.
PMID: 17080001BACKGROUNDMahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F, Galy C, Slama M, Dupont H. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2570-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a380a3.
PMID: 19623051BACKGROUNDCioffi G, Mazzone C, Barbati G, Rossi A, Nistri S, Ognibeni F, Tarantini L, Di Lenarda A, Faggiano P, Pulignano G, Stefenelli C, de Simone G, Devereux RB. Combined circumferential and longitudinal left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Echocardiography. 2015 Jul;32(7):1064-72. doi: 10.1111/echo.12825. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
PMID: 25370995BACKGROUNDRader F, Sachdev E, Arsanjani R, Siegel RJ. Left ventricular hypertrophy in valvular aortic stenosis: mechanisms and clinical implications. Am J Med. 2015 Apr;128(4):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.054. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
PMID: 25460869BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ole Broch, MD
Consultant anesthetist
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2015
First Posted
May 12, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 12, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05