NCT02434432

Brief Summary

Background: Music therapy has been recommended as an adjuvant therapy for both preterm infants and mothers throughout their stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and has been shown to have some beneficial effects, although conclusive evidence remains lacking. Objectives: To study the usefulness of two forms of music, as well as no music, on pain and physiological and behavioral parameters of preterm infants during a heel stick procedure for obtaining blood in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Hypotheses: Infants hearing music chosen by their mothers will have less pain and optimal behavioral and physiologic responses as compared to infants who hear the lullaby or no music. Methods: An analytical observational study with a randomized cross-over design will be utilized. Inclusion will be stable infants born between 28 to 36 weeks of gestation, with normal hearing. Neonatal Physiologic responses \[heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation, (02 sat) and respiratory rate(RR)\] and Behavioral States will be recorded before and after the heel stick procedure. Maternal age, education, and pregnancy complications will be also be documented. Pain responses will be recorded using the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale (NPASS). Ethical considerations: The study imposes minimal risk on infants. One potential risk is that the infant may become agitated while listening to music, especially if it is time for feeding. Based on previous research, infants tend to calm down while listening to music. However, in the infants who may be hungry or fussy, music exacerbate their agitation. To prevent this from occurring the investigators will not perform the heel stick close to feeding time and the investigators will be vigilantly timing and monitoring the infant's agitation. Because music has been shown to calm infants and stop them from crying, the benefits outweigh this risk. The heel stick is performed routinely on infants (often 3-6 times a day). The investigators will not perform any additional heel sticks for this study, but will rather intervene during one of the scheduled heel stick procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2015

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 20, 2015

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 5, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2015

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 20, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pain responses of preterm infants assessed on the NPASS

    During a heelstick procedure 5 minutes after the music conditions 1 & 2 or the control

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Physiologic resposnes

    5 minutes before, during and five minutes after the heelstick

  • Behavioral responses

    Recorded at 5 minutes before during and five minutes after the heelstick

Study Arms (3)

condition 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Infants in this arm will receive their mother's choice of music recorded on an Mp player and delivered via headphones.

Behavioral: music therapy selected by mothers

condition 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Infants in this arm wil receive a recorded Lullaby music delivered to the infant via headphones.

Behavioral: Music therapy recorded lullaby

Condition 3

NO INTERVENTION

Infants in this arm will have the headphones applied but no music played.

Interventions

mothers' choice of music

Also known as: condition 1
condition 1

recorded lullaby

Also known as: condition 2
condition 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age28 Weeks - 36 Weeks
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Infants will be included if they meet the following criteria: between 28 to 36 weeks gestational age, stable condition, not requiring any respiratory support, in an isolette or open crib, are at least one week post natal age and if their mothers have listened to music while pregnant.

You may not qualify if:

  • Infant will be excluded if they are intubated and on a ventilator or high frequency ventilation, if they have a congenital anomaly that mainly affects hearing, such as craniofacial anomalies; and if they have brain anomalies associated with neurological disorders such as: grade 3-4 intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

American University Medical Center (AUBMC)

Beirut, Lebanon

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Orcesi S, Olivieri I, Longo S, Perotti G, La Piana R, Tinelli C, Spinillo A, Balottin U, Stronati M. Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants born from 2005 to 2007. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 Nov;16(6):716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

    PMID: 22709626BACKGROUND
  • Keith DR, Russell K, Weaver BS. The effects of music listening on inconsolable crying in premature infants. J Music Ther. 2009 Fall;46(3):191-203. doi: 10.1093/jmt/46.3.191.

    PMID: 19757875BACKGROUND
  • Standley J. Music therapy research in the NICU: an updated meta-analysis. Neonatal Netw. 2012 Sep-Oct;31(5):311-6. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.31.5.311.

    PMID: 22908052BACKGROUND
  • Alipour Z, Eskandari N, Ahmari Tehran H, Eshagh Hossaini SK, Sangi S. Effects of music on physiological and behavioral responses of premature infants: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(3):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 May 9.

    PMID: 23890458BACKGROUND
  • Badr LK, Abdallah B, Hawari M, Sidani S, Kassar M, Nakad P, Breidi J. Determinants of premature infant pain responses to heel sticks. Pediatr Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):129-36.

    PMID: 20687304BACKGROUND
  • Kaminski J, Hall W. The effect of soothing music on neonatal behavioral states in the hospital newborn nursery. Neonatal Netw. 1996 Feb;15(1):45-54.

    PMID: 8700082BACKGROUND
  • Chen LC, Wu YC, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, Leng CH, Chen WJ, Chiu NC, Lee WT, Yang MC, Fang LJ, Hsu HC, Jeng SF. The effect of in-hospital developmental care on neonatal morbidity, growth and development of preterm Taiwanese infants: a randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2013 May;89(5):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

    PMID: 23168303BACKGROUND
  • Chou LL, Wang RH, Chen SJ, Pai L. Effects of music therapy on oxygen saturation in premature infants receiving endotracheal suctioning. J Nurs Res. 2003 Sep;11(3):209-16. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347637.02971.ec.

    PMID: 14579198BACKGROUND
  • Whipple J. The effect of music-reinforced nonnutritive sucking on state of preterm, low birthweight infants experiencing heelstick. J Music Ther. 2008 Fall;45(3):227-72. doi: 10.1093/jmt/45.3.227.

    PMID: 18959451BACKGROUND
  • Loewy J, Stewart K, Dassler AM, Telsey A, Homel P. The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):902-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1367. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

    PMID: 23589814BACKGROUND
  • Cevasco AM, Grant RE. Effects of the pacifier activated lullaby on weight gain of premature infants. J Music Ther. 2005 Summer;42(2):123-39. doi: 10.1093/jmt/42.2.123.

    PMID: 15913390BACKGROUND
  • Yildiz A, Arikan D. The effects of giving pacifiers to premature infants and making them listen to lullabies on their transition period for total oral feeding and sucking success. J Clin Nurs. 2012 Mar;21(5-6):644-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03634.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

    PMID: 21668549BACKGROUND
  • Standley JM, Cassidy J, Grant R, Cevasco A, Szuch C, Nguyen J, Walworth D, Procelli D, Jarred J, Adams K. The effect of music reinforcement for non-nutritive sucking on nipple feeding of premature infants. Pediatr Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):138-45.

    PMID: 20687305BACKGROUND
  • Bo LK, Callaghan P. Soothing pain-elicited distress in Chinese neonates. Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4):E49. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.e49.

    PMID: 10742370BACKGROUND
  • Butt ML, Kisilevsky BS. Music modulates behaviour of premature infants following heel lance. Can J Nurs Res. 2000 Mar;31(4):17-39.

    PMID: 11189668BACKGROUND
  • Johnston CC, Filion F, Campbell-Yeo M, Goulet C, Bell L, McNaughton K, Byron J. Enhanced kangaroo mother care for heel lance in preterm neonates: a crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;29(1):51-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.113. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

    PMID: 18769382BACKGROUND
  • Hartling L, Shaik MS, Tjosvold L, Leicht R, Liang Y, Kumar M. Music for medical indications in the neonatal period: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 Sep;94(5):F349-54. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148411. Epub 2009 May 28.

    PMID: 19477913BACKGROUND
  • Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG. Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;28(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211861. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

    PMID: 18165830BACKGROUND
  • Als H, Lawhon G, Brown E, Gibes R, Duffy FH, McAnulty G, Blickman JG. Individualized behavioral and environmental care for the very low birth weight preterm infant at high risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: neonatal intensive care unit and developmental outcome. Pediatrics. 1986 Dec;78(6):1123-32.

    PMID: 3786036BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2015

First Posted

May 5, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

February 1, 2015

Study Completion

March 1, 2015

Last Updated

May 5, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-04

Locations