Study of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge Along With Systemic Antibiotic in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
COACT-1
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Blinded Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in Combination With Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Diabetic Patients With an Infected Foot Ulcer
1 other identifier
interventional
612
1 country
86
Brief Summary
This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits approximately 10, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started May 2015
86 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 25, 2021
CompletedAugust 25, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.4 years
April 17, 2015
May 28, 2021
August 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Cure (Resolution of All Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Infection)
The primary efficacy variable is the percent of patients with a clinical outcome of clinical cure (Resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms of infection) at F/U visit 1
approximately 10 days after end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Clinical Cure and Baseline Pathogen Eradication (Resolution of All Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Infection) and Baseline Pathogen Eradication)
Approximately 10 days after end of treatment
Reinfection (Percent of Patients With Re-infection)
Approximately 90 days after end of treatment
Time to Clinical Cure
Approximately 10 days after end of treatment
Amputation (Percent of Patients That Have an Amputation Associated With the Target Ulcer)
Within approximately 90 days of end of treatment
Ulcer Closure (Percent of Patients With Target Ulcer Closure)
within approximately 30 days of end of treatment
Study Arms (3)
Gentamicin sponge group
EXPERIMENTALTopical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: Up to four collagen sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base) administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.
Placebo sponge group
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching placebo collagen sponge administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.
No sponge group
NO INTERVENTIONSystemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.
Interventions
Up to 4 topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has diabetes mellitus, according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
- Has at least 1 skin ulcer located on or below the malleolus that presents with the following clinical manifestations of a moderate or severe infection based on the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for the "Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections" (CID 2012; 54:132-173) (IDSA guidelines):
- has ≥ 2 manifestations of inflammation (local swelling or induration, erythema, local tenderness or pain, local warmth, purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white or sanguineous secretion)
- has ≥ 1 of the following characteristics: erythema \> 2cm, or involving structures deeper than skin and subcutaneous tissues (e.g. abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, fasciitis) For patients with multiple infected ulcers, the ulcer with the highest Diabetic Foot Infection Wound score (DFI score) must be on or below the malleolus and all infected ulcers must be completely coverable using no more than 4 sponges (sponges cannot be cut).
- Has documented adequate arterial perfusion in the affected limb(s) (either palpable dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses, or normal Doppler wave forms, a toe blood pressure ≥ 45 mm Hg or participation is approved by a vascular surgeon)
- Has received appropriate surgical intervention to remove all necrotic and infected bone if diagnosed with osteomyelitis.
- Has received appropriate surgical debridement to remove all gangrenous tissue.
You may not qualify if:
- Has a known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin (or other aminoglycosides).
- Has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to bovine collagen.
- Has an ulcer infection which, based upon the patient's known history of hypersensitivity and/or as otherwise in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately treated with at least one of the empiric systemic antibiotic regimens allowed by this protocol.
- Has an ulcer associated with prosthetic material or an implanted device.
- Has received any systemic or topical antibiotic therapy for any reason within 7 days of randomization unless it was administered to specifically treat the infected ulcer(s) and only within 36 hours of randomization.
- Requires or is likely to require treatment with any concomitant topical product or wound therapy before the first follow-up study visit.
- Is severely immunocompromised, or likely to become severely immunocompromised during the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
- Has a history of myasthenia gravis or other neurological condition where gentamicin use is contraindicated as determined by the investigator.
- Has a history of epilepsy.
- Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the past 12 months.
- Has an uncontrolled illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to cause the patient to be withdrawn from the trial or would otherwise interfere with interpreting the results of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Innocolllead
Study Sites (86)
Unknown Facility
Anniston, Alabama, 36207, United States
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, 85206, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032, United States
Unknown Facility
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703, United States
Unknown Facility
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72212, United States
Unknown Facility
Bakersfield, California, 93301, United States
Unknown Facility
Chino, California, 91710, United States
Unknown Facility
Corona, California, 92882, United States
Unknown Facility
Fountain Valley, California, 36207, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, 93720, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, 93721, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, 93722, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, 90822, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States
Unknown Facility
Oakland, California, 94609, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Unknown Facility
Sylmar, California, 91342, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Unknown Facility
Clermont, Florida, 34711, United States
Unknown Facility
Cooper City, Florida, 33024, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States
Unknown Facility
DeLand, Florida, 32720, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleming Island, Florida, 32003, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33012, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Unknown Facility
Hollywood, Florida, 33024, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33122, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33126, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33135, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33155, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33174, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33175, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33185, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166, United States
Unknown Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713, United States
Unknown Facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406, United States
Unknown Facility
Weston, Florida, 33326, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, 30907, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States
Unknown Facility
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Unknown Facility
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, 46123, United States
Unknown Facility
Mooresville, Indiana, 46158, United States
Unknown Facility
Muncie, Indiana, 47304, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Maryland, 21131, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Unknown Facility
Flint, Michigan, 48504, United States
Unknown Facility
Butte, Montana, 59701, United States
Unknown Facility
Great Falls, Montana, 59405, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101, United States
Unknown Facility
North Brunswick, New Jersey, 08902, United States
Unknown Facility
Somerset, New Jersey, 08873, United States
Unknown Facility
Hopewell Junction, New York, 12533, United States
Unknown Facility
New Windsor, New York, 12553, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Unknown Facility
Lima, Ohio, 45801, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73139, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
Unknown Facility
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Unknown Facility
West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, 75224, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
Unknown Facility
Lampasas, Texas, 76550, United States
Unknown Facility
Lubbock, Texas, 79410, United States
Unknown Facility
McAllen, Texas, 78501, United States
Unknown Facility
North Richland Hills, Texas, 76180, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78224, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Unknown Facility
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479, United States
Unknown Facility
Webster, Texas, 77598, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Unknown Facility
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23464, United States
Unknown Facility
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lesley Russell, MBChB, MRCP, Chief Medical Officer
- Organization
- Innocoll
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nigel Jones
Vice President, Global Clinical Operations, Innocoll Pharmaceutical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2015
First Posted
April 28, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 25, 2021
Results First Posted
August 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08