Healing of Human Achilles Tendon Rupture
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aim of this project is to investigate the healing processes of human tendon after suturing a ruptured Achilles tendon, and more specifically to determine the optimal loading pattern of the tendon during the rehabilitation period to ensure complete and good recovery of tendon structure and function. The investigators hypothesize that restricting early weight bearing and only allowing for passive stretching in the early phase of tendon healing will ensure better tissue regeneration and thereby prevent chronic tendon elongation and improve tendon tissue recovery and the clinical outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedApril 21, 2015
April 1, 2015
4.1 years
April 16, 2015
April 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tendon elongation
Tendon elongation will be evaluated using x-ray and measurements of the distance between tantalum beads
2, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Heel-rise
26 and 52 weeks after rupture
Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS)
12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture
Elastic modulus of the tendon
6, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture
Range of motion test
26 and 52 weeks after rupture
Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire - Achilles tendinopathy (VISA-A)
12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis constitutes the currently accepted regime and is therefore consider the control group (CTRL) with early range of motion and early weight bearing. The control group was allowed to have partial weight-bearing from day 0 and full weight-bearing from week 4. Furthermore, they were instructed in tendon strain exercise identical with the range of motion group.
Range of motion
EXPERIMENTALEarly range of motion and delayed weight bearing (ROM). The range of motion group was restricted completely from weight-bearing until week 6, allowed partial weight-bearing after 6 weeks and full weight-bearing after 8 weeks. In addition to this, the patients were instructed to perform tendon strain exercises, five times a day, from week 2. The exercises were performed by removing the foot from the brace and then perform light dorsal ankle movement, 25 repetitions/time, when sitting on a table.
Immobilization
EXPERIMENTALDelayed weight-bearing or range of motion (IMMOB). The immobilization group was restricted completely from weight-bearing until week 6, allowed partial weight-bearing after 6 weeks and full weight-bearing after 8 weeks.
Interventions
25 range of motion exercises of the ankle, 5 times per day.
No weight-bearing during the first six weeks, and partial weight-bearing during the two following weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Complete Achilles tendon rupture placed in the mid-substance of the Achilles tendon
- Presented within 14 days from injury
You may not qualify if:
- re-rupture
- other injuries affecting their lower limb functions
- systemic diseases influencing tendon healing
- immunosuppressive treatment including systemic corticosteroid treatment
- inability to follow rehabilitation or follow-ups.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospitallead
- University of Copenhagencollaborator
- Danish Council for Independent Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, 2400, Denmark
Related Publications (7)
Magnusson SP, Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Kjaer M. Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo. J Physiol. 2008 Jan 1;586(1):71-81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139105. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
PMID: 17855761BACKGROUNDMaffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, Reaper J, Douglas AS. Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med. 1999 Jul;9(3):157-60. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199907000-00007.
PMID: 10512344BACKGROUNDSaxena A, Ewen B, Maffulli N. Rehabilitation of the operated achilles tendon: parameters for predicting return to activity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Jan-Feb;50(1):37-40. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
PMID: 21106412BACKGROUNDAndersson T, Eliasson P, Aspenberg P. Tissue memory in healing tendons: short loading episodes stimulate healing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Aug;107(2):417-21. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00414.2009. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
PMID: 19541735BACKGROUNDMortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE. Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jul;81(7):983-90. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00011.
PMID: 10428130BACKGROUNDKangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):59-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546506293255. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
PMID: 16973901BACKGROUNDEliasson P, Agergaard AS, Couppe C, Svensson R, Hoeffner R, Warming S, Warming N, Holm C, Jensen MH, Krogsgaard M, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. The Ruptured Achilles Tendon Elongates for 6 Months After Surgical Repair Regardless of Early or Late Weightbearing in Combination With Ankle Mobilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2492-2502. doi: 10.1177/0363546518781826. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PMID: 29965789DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Magnusson, PT, DSc, PhD
Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael Kjaer, MD, PhD
Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postdoc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2015
First Posted
April 21, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 21, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04