Study Stopped
Lack of subject enrollment
Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 12, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.8 years
March 24, 2015
October 8, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Functional Outcomes
The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor ADL questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale) for comparison to preoperative scores.
12 weeks post-operatively
Quality of Life Assessment
Quality of life in Essential Tremor \[QUEST\] questionnaire will be collected again for comparison to preoperative scores.
12 week post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Neurocognitive Function
6 months post-operatively
Other Outcomes (1)
Tremor Reduction
12 weeks post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
Awake DBS Surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS surgery utilizing microelectrode recordings and intraoperative stimulation.
Asleep DBS Surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing DBS surgery under general anesthesia utilizing intraoperative imaging to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrode placement at the time of surgery.
Interventions
Deep Brain Stimulation surgery awake vs. asleep
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Essential Tremor diagnosed by criteria listed in the Consensus statement of the Movement Disorders Society on Tremor
- Age 18 - 85 years of age
- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations
- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia per DSM-V criteria
- Medical or other condition precluding MRI
- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than Essential Tremor
- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day
- Pregnancy
- History of suicide attempt
- Currently uncontrolled clinically significant depression (BDI\>20)
- History of schizophrenia, delusions, or currently uncontrolled visual hallucinations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Related Publications (11)
Bain PG, Findley LJ, Atchison P, Behari M, Vidailhet M, Gresty M, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Assessing tremor severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;56(8):868-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.8.868.
PMID: 8350102BACKGROUNDElble R, Bain P, Forjaz MJ, Haubenberger D, Testa C, Goetz CG, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Pavy-Le Traon A, Post B, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Weintraub D, Schrag A. Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1793-800. doi: 10.1002/mds.25648. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PMID: 24038576BACKGROUNDFlora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1550-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23195.
PMID: 20623768BACKGROUNDTroster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Sep;11(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.05.009.
PMID: 16103000BACKGROUNDOstrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PMID: 22944465BACKGROUNDBurchiel KJ, McCartney S, Lee A, Raslan AM. Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording. J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):301-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.JNS122324. Epub 2013 May 31.
PMID: 23724986BACKGROUNDWeaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
PMID: 19126811BACKGROUNDPezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069.
PMID: 21725253BACKGROUNDAlexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0271.
PMID: 7616273BACKGROUNDPapanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(98)90197-7.
PMID: 18644283BACKGROUNDKooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90499-5.
PMID: 8175410BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francisco A Ponce, MD
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2015
First Posted
April 16, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 12, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10