Open-Labeled PK-PD Studies of Metoprolol ER
Open-Labeled Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Studies of Metoprolol ER
3 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Recently, the quality of generic metoprolol extended-release (ER) products has been called into question with reports of inconsistent effects when switching from the brand name product to a generic formulation. Problems with how the body processes these drugs could have serious and widespread consequences given the high frequency of metoprolol ER use in the management of various cardiovascular disorders, including high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias. Investigators hypothesize that both product- and subject-specific factors lead to variability in the way the body breaks down the drug (pharmacokinetics) and clinical response to generic versus name brand metoprolol ER formulations. Investigators will study the brand name and generic metoprolol ER formulations in subjects with high blood pressure to compare the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular responses among equivalent labeled doses of each product (brand name and two approved generics). The study objective is to provide information on how the body breaks down generic and brand name metoprolol ER products (pharmacokinetics) and how the body responds to generic and brand name metoprolol ER products (pharmacodynamics) to better understand if generic metoprolol ER products are as good as the brand name product.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2015
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 6, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 8, 2019
CompletedFebruary 10, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.8 years
April 1, 2015
July 29, 2019
February 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)
The AUC of Brand name metoprolol ER will be compared against each generic for determination of bioequivalence. The mean and standard deviation (SD) values of AUC are entered separately for the 50mg, 100mg and 150mg doses. Results are reported for brand name metoprolol ER, Generic B and Generic A.
0.0, 0.30, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12.0, 16.0, 20.0, 24.0 hours post dose
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metoprolol Succinate
The Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Brand name metoprolol ER will be compared against each generic for determination of bioequivalence. The mean and SD values of Cmax are entered separately for the 50mg, 100mg and 150mg doses. Results are reported for brand name metoprolol ER, Generic B and Generic A.
0.0, 0.30, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12.0, 16.0, 20.0, 24.0 hours post dose
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Response to Brand Name Metoprolol ER Versus Each Generic Formulation of Metoprolol Succinate.
Heart rate variability (Low-to-High Frequency Ratio) over each quartile of 6 hours in the 24-hr period
Blood Pressure Values (Systolic and Diastolic) Compared Between Brand Name Metoprolol ER and Each Generic Metoprolol Formulation (Generic B, Generic A)
Average value over each quartile of 6 hours in the 24-hr period
Heart Rate (HR) Response Compared Between Brand Name Metoprolol ER and Each Generic (Generic B, Generic A) Formulation of Metoprolol Succinate
Average value over each quartile of 6 hours in the 24-hr period
Study Arms (2)
Study Sequence A
ACTIVE COMPARATORStart with brand name metoprolol ER, switch to Generic B metoprolol, switch back to brand name metoprolol ER, then switch to Generic A metoprolol
Study Sequence B
ACTIVE COMPARATORStart with brand name metoprolol ER, switch to Generic A metoprolol, switch back to brand name metoprolol ER, then switch to Generic B metoprolol.
Interventions
This medication will be taken for 7 to 28 days
This medication will be taken for 7 days
This medication will be taken for 7 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will be targeted for enrollment based on current treatment of their hypertension with a beta-blocker or known tolerability to a beta-blocker based on their previous participation in the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses studies (PEAR-1 and PEAR-2). If necessary to meet enrollment targets, additional patients will be recruited from the existing patient population in the University of Florida Health Family Medicine clinic or through other means.
You may not qualify if:
- Documented secondary forms of hypertension
- Known cardiovascular disease (including history of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization procedure, heart failure, or presence of a cardiac pacemaker)
- Known cerebrovascular disease (including stroke and TIA)
- Known peripheral vascular disease
- Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or 2) (defined as a diabetes diagnosis in the medical record or fasting blood glucose greater than or equal to 126 mg per dl or nonfasting blood glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg per dl on screening laboratories)
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than180 mm Hg on screening visit
- Heart rate less than 55 bpm on screening visit (in the absence of treatment with a beta-blocker)
- Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 1.5 in men or greater than 1.4 in women on screening laboratories)
- Liver enzymes (ALT and or AST) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal on screening laboratories.
- Known Raynaud's phenomenon
- Known asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Gastric bezoar
- Swallowing disorders
- Strictures
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Floridalead
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Family Medicine at Hampton Oaks Medical Plaza
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
Oak Hammock at the University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
Limitations and Caveats
1. The final study sample size was lower than what was originally proposed based on power analysis. 2. The study protocol did not specify the attainment of steady-state prior to the 24-hour pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Larisa H Cavallari
- Organization
- UF
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larisa Cavallari, PharmD
University of Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2015
First Posted
April 15, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 6, 2018
Study Completion
June 6, 2018
Last Updated
February 10, 2020
Results First Posted
November 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-02