Study of PEMF (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field) Therapy in the Treatment of Persistent Post-Operative Pain Following Lumbar Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
8
Brief Summary
To demonstrate the analgesic effectiveness of 2 modalities of PEMF treatment compared to sham treatment in patients with persistent pain following lumbar surgery when treatment is administered twice daily over a 60 day period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 9, 2017
CompletedFebruary 9, 2017
December 1, 2016
1.4 years
March 30, 2015
October 26, 2016
December 19, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Scores
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to score pain at Baseline and at End of Treatment. The Percent change (difference) from Baseline to End of Treatment was calculated. The NPRS is an 11-point scale ranging from scores of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
60 days
Study Arms (3)
Sham of Provant
OTHERSham of Provant
Active Treatment
OTHERActive Provant Treatment
Active Treatment with alternative settings
OTHERActive Provant Treatment with alternative settings
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject age is greater than or equal to 22 years.
- Subject has undergone one or two anatomically successful lumbar back surgeries for the treatment of low back pain.
- Subject has persistent pain in the low back and/or radiating pain to leg(s) for \> 3 months and \< 36 months following the most recent surgery. If radiating leg pain is occurring in both legs, one leg, which has the worst Average Pain Intensity over the week prior to the Screening Visit, will be selected as the index leg.
- Subject has been receiving medication for persistent post-operative low back and/or radiating leg pain, including opioid or non-opioid analgesic medication, and is on a stable analgesic dosing regimen (i.e. the same medications and dosages) for \> 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
- Average Pain Intensity (calculated as the mean of the daily Average Pain Intensity scores for either back and/or leg) is ≥ 3 and \< 9 as measured on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the 10-day run-in period.
- Subject has completed a minimum of 80% (8 of 10 possible) of the electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) assessments during the 10 day run-in period.
- Subject is able to access an internet browser in the home environment.
- Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent and to comply with all parts of the study protocol.
- Female subjects must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing (or agree to practice) an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active for the duration of the study. (Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, double-barrier methods, and/or male partner sterilization).
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a history of more than two lumbar spine surgeries.
- Subject requires additional lumbar surgery or surgery of any type prior to Day 75.
- Subject had disc fusion at any level in the most recent surgery.
- Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer, prior to the Screening Visit or is enrolled in another clinical trial.
- Subject has undergone any local injection into the lumbar spine within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or within 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit for long acting lidocaine injection products.
- Subject has used systemic corticosteroids within 2 months of the Screening Visit.
- Subject has a history of any uncontrolled medical illness that in the investigator's judgment places the subject at unacceptable risk for receipt of PEMF therapy.
- Subject has a history of malignancy within the past five years other than successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the treatment area and/or localized in situ carcinoma of the cervix.
- Subject has an ongoing painful condition that in the opinion of the investigator might have a confounding influence on the safety or effectiveness analyses for this study.
- Subject has a serious psychosocial co-morbidity.
- Subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse within one year prior to screening.
- Subject has an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator, neurostimulator, spinal cord stimulator, bone stimulator, cochlear implant, or other implanted device with an implanted metal lead(s).
- Subject consumes an average of \> 100 mg oral Morphine Sulfate equivalents per day during the 10 day run-in period.
- Standard deviation around the mean of the average pain intensity scores during the 10 day run-in period is \> 2.0.
- Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 38 kg/m2.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
AOC-Research
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States
Hope Research
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States
Injury Care Research
Boise, Idaho, 83713, United States
Rockford Orthopedic
Rockford, Illinois, 61114, United States
Hope Research_Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106, United States
Tarheel Clinical Research
Raliegh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Upstate Clinical
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Danville Orthopedic
Danville, Virginia, 24541, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Heather Vander Ploeg
- Organization
- Regenesis Biomedical Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2015
First Posted
April 15, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 9, 2017
Results First Posted
February 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-12