Effectiveness of Clinician Client Centered Counseling on Sexual Behaviors of Antiretroviral Therapy Patients in Nigeria
1 other identifier
interventional
386
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a clinician client centered counseling on knowledge on HIV transmission and prevention, attitudes towards HIV/AIDS, and sexual behaviors of adult HIV patients enrolled in care in Yola, Nigeria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable hiv
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable hiv
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedApril 15, 2015
April 1, 2015
8 months
March 23, 2015
April 14, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Knowledge on HIV prevention and transmission
Knowledge on HIV prevention and transmission was assessed in section 2 of the questionnaire. This section had a total of 17 statements and answers with options of 'yes', 'no' and 'don't know'. A correct response had a score of 1 and an incorrect response a score of 0. Mean knowledge scores were determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and comparison made among the 3 groups.
Change from baseline knowledge on HIV prevention and transmission at 2 months and at 6 months
Attitude towards HIV/AIDS
Attitudes towards HIV/AIDS was assessed in section 3 of the questionnaire. This section consisted of 5 statements to address patient's attitude towards HIV/AIDS. Answer options to these questions were from a 5 point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree, agree, don't know, disagree and strongly disagree. A score of '1' was assigned to 'strongly disagree', a score of '2' was assigned to 'disagree', a score of '3' was assigned to 'don't know', a score of '4' was assigned to 'agree' and a score of '5' was assigned to 'strongly agree' Total score possible for attitude range from 5 to 25. On the basis of summated scores respondents were divided into high or low attitude using the 50 percentile as cut off. Attitude scores were determine at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and comparison made among the 3 groups.
Change from baseline attitudes towards HIV/AIDS at 2 months and at 6 months
Frequency of condom use
Frequency of condom use was assessed in section 4 of the questionnaire. The proportions of self reported protected sexual activity (vaginal, anal and oral) out of all sexual activity in the preceding 30 days before the interviews were determined for each respondent. These proportions were determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and represented the condom use scores. Median condom use score were determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and comparison made among the 3 groups
Change form baseline frequency of condom use during sexual activity at 2 months and at 6 months
Multiple sexual partners
Self reported number of sexual partners of respondents was assessed in section 4 of the questionnaire. A score of '1' was given to each number of sexual partner reported by respondents in the preceding 30 days of the interview.The means of this scores were determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and comparison made among the 3 groups.
Change from baseline number of multiple sexual partners at 2 months and at 6 months
Status disclosure
HIV status disclosure to spouses/sex partners was assessed in section 5 of the questionnaire. Self reported number of spouses/sex partners the respondents had disclosed their HIV status too was determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months, A score of '1' was given to each spouse/sex partner who was aware of the respondents HIV status at the time of the interviews at baseline, 2 months and 6 months. This represented the status disclosure score. The means of these status disclosure scores were determined at baseline, 2 months and 6 months and comparison made among the 3 groups.
Change from baseline HIV status disclosure to spouse or sex partner at 2 months and at 6 months
Study Arms (3)
CCC Counseling; baseline and 2 months
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group 1 received 2 CCC Counseling sessions; at baseline and at 2 months. The intervention was a 10 to 15 minute clinic based one on one counseling session between a clinician (counselor) and a HIV positive adult patient (client). Areas covered during the brief counseling included; HIV transmission and prevention, healthy sexual practices, condom use, reduction in multiple sexual partners, beneficial disclosure, and individual risk assessment and reduction strategies.
CCC Counseling; baseline
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group 2 received a session CCC Counseling session at baseline only. The intervention was a 10 to 15 minute clinic based one on one counseling session between a clinician (counselor) and a HIV positive adult patient (client). Areas covered during the brief counseling included; HIV transmission and prevention, healthy sexual practices, condom use, reduction in multiple sexual partners, beneficial disclosure, and individual risk assessment and reduction strategies.
Routine care
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group received routine clinic care.
Interventions
Counseling sessions were interactive allowing for listening, questions and answers. They were cultural sensitive and also consider issues related to gender and age. Areas covered during the brief counseling included; HIV transmission and prevention, healthy sexual practices, condom use, reduction in multiple sexual partners, beneficial disclosure, and individual risk assessment and reduction strategies. Clinicians evaluated patients' readiness to change risky or maintain safer behaviors. They also assisted the patient to negotiate an individually tailored behavior change or maintenance plan of action.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all persons diagnosed with HIV ≥ 18years of age presenting to the 4 comprehensive ART clinics in Yola
You may not qualify if:
- Patients excluded from this study were:
- those patients who declined consent
- adult HIV positive patients diagnosed with mental illnesses rendering them unfit to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olutayo F Martins, MBBS, MPH
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Posted
April 15, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 15, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04