Study Stopped
the study was halted prematurely due to slow recruitment and expiration of funding
Can Vitamin D3 Improve Cognitive Function in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes? (THINK-D)
THINK-D
2 other identifiers
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diabetes increases the risk of cognitive dysfunction. The incidence of dementia is 1.5 to 2.5 times higher in persons with diabetes than the general population. There is evidence that cognitive decline significantly impacts the ability to self-manage diabetes. Strategies to prevent cognitive decline in persons with diabetes has not been well studied. A recent study reported that in persons who had vitamin D deficiency, the risk for all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's was doubled. Vitamin D receptors are located in the brain and deficiency of vitamin D has been reported to negatively affect the development of brain. Therefore, providing vitamin D supplementation to improve cognitive function is worthy of study. The investigators propose a small, randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation in persons with type 2 diabetes who have symptoms of cognitive impairment. Persons will be randomized to receive either weekly vitamin D3 supplementation (50,000 IUs) or a matching comparator (5000 IUs) for a period of three months. The study aims are to determine (1) the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on cognitive function and (2) the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on diabetes self-management. A sample of persons with type 2 diabetes (n=62), who have a subjective complaint of a cognitive dysfunction or scoring at least one standard deviation below normal on a cognitive functioning screening test, have vitamin D levels less 30 ng/ml, are not depressed (as this impacts cognitive function), and do not have severe diabetes complication will be recruited. Participants will be phone screened and complete two baseline visits prior to randomization. They will then have phone call and follow-up visits to assess (1) cognitive function using standardized tests to assess for executive function (2) serum measurements (HBA1c, fasting glucose, vitamin D levels, and cardiometabolic profile) and (3) surveys to assess cognitive function as well as self-management behaviors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 diabetes
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for phase_2 diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 12, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 23, 2020
CompletedOctober 23, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.8 years
April 6, 2015
November 4, 2019
September 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Letter-Number Sequencing
The the Letter-Number Sequencing Test (from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III assessment) is an assessment of working memory. Scores on the assessment are standardized as scaled scores with a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 3 (μ = 10, SD = 3) using age adjusted normative data provided by Pearson assessments (https://www.pearsonassessments.com/). A scaled score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A scaled score of 10 is equal to the mean. Scaled scores below 10 indicate performance is lower than average, and scaled scores higher than 10 indicate performance is higher than average. Higher scaled scores indicate better performance.
13 weeks
Controlled Oral Word Association Test
The Controlled Oral Word Association Test is a measure of verbal fluency. Scores are standardized as z-scores (μ = 0, SD = 1) using age adjusted normative data provided by Tombaugh and Kozak (1996). A z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative z-scores indicate performance is lower than average, and positive z-scores indicate performance is higher than average. Positive z-scores indicate better performance.
13 Weeks
Stroop Interference Test
The Stroop Interference Test is a measure of executive functioning. Scores are standardized as z-scores (μ = 0, SD = 1) using age adjusted normative data provided by PAR Incorporated (https://www.parinc.com/). A z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative z-scores indicate performance is lower than average, and positive z-scores indicate performance is higher than average. Positive z-scores indicate better performance.
13 Weeks
Symbol-Digit Modality Test
The Symbol-Digit Modality Test is a measure of executive functioning. Scores are standardized as z-scores (μ = 0, SD = 1) using age adjusted normative data provided by WPS Publishers (https://www.wpspublish.com/). A z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative z-scores indicate performance is lower than average, and positive z-scores indicate performance is higher than average. Positive z-scores indicate better performance.
13 Weeks
Trail Making Test Part B
The Trail Making Test Part B is a measure of executive functioning. Scores are standardized as z-scores (μ = 0, SD = 1) using age adjusted normative data provided by WPS Publishers (https://www.wpspublish.com/). A z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative z-scores indicate performance is lower than average, and positive z-scores indicate performance is higher than average. Positive z-scores indicate better performance.
13 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hopkins Verbal Learning Total Recall Test
13 weeks
Semantic Fluency Test
13 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
High Dose
EXPERIMENTAL50,000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for three months
Low Dose
ACTIVE COMPARATOR5,000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for three months
Interventions
Participants will take randomly assigned high dose cholecalciferol once weekly for three months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women and men aged 18 to 75 years
- Have type 2 diabetes
- Having a subjective complaint of a cognitive dysfunction or scoring at least one standard deviation below normal on a cognitive functioning screening test
- Vitamin D level as measured by 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) \< 32 ng/mL
- Under the care of a healthcare provider
- Systolic blood pressure ≤160 and diastolic blood pressure ≤100
You may not qualify if:
- Persons with malabsorption problems (e.g., crohn's disease)
- Hypercalcemia
- Supplementation other than a daily multivitamin
- Severe complications of diabetes (i.e., amputation, blindness, and dialysis)
- Concomitant use of steroids
- GFR \< 60
- Creatinine \> 1.2
- Significant depressive symptoms
- Having a history of bipolar depression, psychotic disorders, loss of consciousness greater than 5 minutes, or a current alcohol or substance use disorder
- Other serious medical conditions deemed significant by the PI or medical monitor
- Concomitant use of cholinesterase inhibitors
- Concomitant use of anxiolytics, kava kava, St. John's Wort, or Ginkgo Biloba
- Pregnancy
- HbA1c \>13%
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Loyola Universitylead
- University of Chicagocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Related Publications (40)
Lee JH, Choi Y, Jun C, Hong YS, Cho HB, Kim JE, Lyoo IK. Neurocognitive changes and their neural correlates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014 Jun;29(2):112-21. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.2.112.
PMID: 25031883BACKGROUNDSmith MA, Else JE, Paul L, Foster JK, Walker M, Wesnes KA, Riby LM. Functional Living in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Executive Functioning, Dual Task Performance, and the Impact on Postural Stability and Motor Control. J Aging Health. 2014 Aug;26(5):841-859. doi: 10.1177/0898264314534896. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PMID: 24898849BACKGROUNDLittlejohns TJ, Henley WE, Lang IA, Annweiler C, Beauchet O, Chaves PH, Fried L, Kestenbaum BR, Kuller LH, Langa KM, Lopez OL, Kos K, Soni M, Llewellyn DJ. Vitamin D and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2014 Sep 2;83(10):920-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000755. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PMID: 25098535BACKGROUNDMcCann JC, Ames BN. Is there convincing biological or behavioral evidence linking vitamin D deficiency to brain dysfunction? FASEB J. 2008 Apr;22(4):982-1001. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9326rev. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
PMID: 18056830BACKGROUNDSchlogl M, Holick MF. Vitamin D and neurocognitive function. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Apr 2;9:559-68. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S51785. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24729696BACKGROUNDHolick MF. High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Mar;81(3):353-73. doi: 10.4065/81.3.353.
PMID: 16529140BACKGROUNDHolick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):266-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070553. No abstract available.
PMID: 17634462BACKGROUNDTuligenga RH, Dugravot A, Tabak AG, Elbaz A, Brunner EJ, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Midlife type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control as risk factors for cognitive decline in early old age: a post-hoc analysis of the Whitehall II cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;2(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70192-X. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
PMID: 24622753BACKGROUNDWennberg AMV, Gottesman RF, Kaufmann CN, Albert MS, Chen-Edinboro LP, Rebok GW, Kasper JD, Spira AP. Diabetes and cognitive outcomes in a nationally representative sample: the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Oct;26(10):1729-1735. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214001380. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PMID: 25075535BACKGROUNDMunshi MN, Hayes M, Iwata I, Lee Y, Weinger K. Which aspects of executive dysfunction influence ability to manage diabetes in older adults? Diabet Med. 2012 Sep;29(9):1171-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03606.x.
PMID: 22340082BACKGROUNDGrober E, Hall CB, Hahn SR, Lipton RB. Memory Impairment and Executive Dysfunction are Associated with Inadequately Controlled Diabetes in Older Adults. J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Oct 1;2(4):229-33. doi: 10.1177/2150131911409945. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
PMID: 23804840BACKGROUNDRetracted: Executive dysfunction in elderly diabetic patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):1106. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12288. Epub 2014 Apr 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 24750335BACKGROUNDWinkler A, Dlugaj M, Weimar C, Jockel KH, Erbel R, Dragano N, Moebus S. Association of diabetes mellitus and mild cognitive impairment in middle-aged men and women. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(4):1269-77. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140696.
PMID: 25024326BACKGROUNDGeijselaers SLC, Sep SJS, Stehouwer CDA, Biessels GJ. Glucose regulation, cognition, and brain MRI in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Jan;3(1):75-89. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70148-2. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
PMID: 25163604BACKGROUNDAnnweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Llewellyn DJ, Richard-Devantoy S, Duque G, Beauchet O. Meta-analysis of memory and executive dysfunctions in relation to vitamin D. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(1):147-71. doi: 10.3233/JAD-130452.
PMID: 23948884BACKGROUNDPenckofer S, Kouba J, Wallis DE, Emanuele MA. Vitamin D and diabetes: let the sunshine in. Diabetes Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;34(6):939-40, 942, 944 passim. doi: 10.1177/0145721708326764.
PMID: 19075078BACKGROUNDGulseth HL, Gjelstad IM, Tierney AC, Lovegrove JA, Defoort C, Blaak EE, Lopez-Miranda J, Kiec-Wilk B, Riserus U, Roche HM, Drevon CA, Birkeland KI. Serum vitamin D concentration does not predict insulin action or secretion in European subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):923-5. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1692. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
PMID: 20067973BACKGROUNDDavidson MB, Duran P, Lee ML, Friedman TC. High-dose vitamin D supplementation in people with prediabetes and hypovitaminosis D. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):260-6. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1204. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
PMID: 23033239BACKGROUNDPenckofer S, Kouba J, Byrn M, Estwing Ferrans C. Vitamin D and depression: where is all the sunshine? Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;31(6):385-93. doi: 10.3109/01612840903437657.
PMID: 20450340BACKGROUNDDrechsler C, Schmiedeke B, Niemann M, Schmiedeke D, Kramer J, Turkin I, Blouin K, Emmert A, Pilz S, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Weidemann F, Breunig F, Wanner C. Potential role of vitamin D deficiency on Fabry cardiomyopathy. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2014 Mar;37(2):289-95. doi: 10.1007/s10545-013-9653-8. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
PMID: 24141790BACKGROUNDAlves MR, Yamamoto T, Arias-Carrion O, Rocha NB, Nardi AE, Machado S, Silva AC. Executive function impairments in patients with depression. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13(6):1026-40. doi: 10.2174/1871527313666140612102321.
PMID: 24923347BACKGROUNDZahodne LB, Nowinski CJ, Gershon RC, Manly JJ. Depressive symptoms are more strongly related to executive functioning and episodic memory among African American compared with non-Hispanic White older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Nov;29(7):663-9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu045. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
PMID: 25280795BACKGROUNDJorde R, Sneve M, Figenschau Y, Svartberg J, Waterloo K. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial. J Intern Med. 2008 Dec;264(6):599-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02008.x. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
PMID: 18793245BACKGROUNDBurton JM, Kimball S, Vieth R, Bar-Or A, Dosch HM, Cheung R, Gagne D, D'Souza C, Ursell M, O'Connor P. A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1852-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e1cec2. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PMID: 20427749BACKGROUNDNazarian S, St Peter JV, Boston RC, Jones SA, Mariash CN. Vitamin D3 supplementation improves insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired fasting glucose. Transl Res. 2011 Nov;158(5):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
PMID: 22005267BACKGROUNDRecker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE. Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Jul;80(7):856-61. doi: 10.4065/80.7.856.
PMID: 16007889BACKGROUNDHolick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1911-30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
PMID: 21646368BACKGROUNDMitri J, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu FB, Pittas AG. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on pancreatic beta cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in adults at high risk of diabetes: the Calcium and Vitamin D for Diabetes Mellitus (CaDDM) randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;94(2):486-94. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.011684. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
PMID: 21715514BACKGROUNDKoutkia P, Lu Z, Chen TC, Holick MF. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency due to Crohn's disease with tanning bed ultraviolet B radiation. Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1485-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29686.
PMID: 11729127BACKGROUNDLips P. Which circulating level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is appropriate? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 May;89-90(1-5):611-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.040.
PMID: 15225848BACKGROUNDEtgen T, Sander D, Bickel H, Sander K, Forstl H. Vitamin D deficiency, cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(5):297-305. doi: 10.1159/000339702. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
PMID: 22759681BACKGROUNDWallis DE, Penckofer S, Sizemore GW. The "sunshine deficit" and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14):1476-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.713339. No abstract available.
PMID: 18824654BACKGROUNDGlanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M, Saraiya M, Crane LA, Buller DB, Manne S, O'Riordan DL, Heckman CJ, Hay J, Robinson JK. Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.46.
PMID: 18283179BACKGROUNDCummings SR, Block G, McHenry K, Baron RB. Evaluation of two food frequency methods of measuring dietary calcium intake. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):796-802. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114716.
PMID: 3661527BACKGROUNDWelch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00832.x.
PMID: 12519323BACKGROUNDRuff RM, Light RH, Parker SB, Levin HS. Benton Controlled Oral Word Association Test: reliability and updated norms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):329-38.
PMID: 14588937BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PMID: 6668417BACKGROUNDGameroff MJ, Wickramaratne P, Weissman MM. Testing the Short and Screener versions of the Social Adjustment Scale-Self-report (SAS-SR). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;21(1):52-65. doi: 10.1002/mpr.358. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
PMID: 22139969BACKGROUNDEndicott J, Nee J. Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):13-6.
PMID: 9133746BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial experienced early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mary Byrn, R.N., Ph.D.
- Organization
- Loyola University Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary A Byrn, Ph.D., R.N.
Loyola University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2015
First Posted
April 14, 2015
Study Start
September 23, 2015
Primary Completion
July 12, 2018
Study Completion
July 12, 2018
Last Updated
October 23, 2020
Results First Posted
October 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual participant data with other researchers