The Influence of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Intraoperative Prosthetic Joint Infection Cultures
1 other identifier
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Total joint replacement is a common clinical practice for patients suffering from disabling arthritis, since it provides significant pain relief and functional recovering. Nevertheless, its outcome is compromised by complications such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is reported to occur in 1 to 4% of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA), and approximately 1% of primary total hip replacements (THR). Despite all efforts to restrain PJI, its prevalence may reach even higher proportions if patients undergo a resection arthroplasty or irrigation and débridement for infected prosthesis. That said, timely diagnosis and early isolation of the infected microorganism is utterly important, if proper care is to be delivered. The gold standard for the diagnosis of PJI is the isolation of a microorganism from the intraoperative cultures, combined with the sonication from retrieved joint implants1. This technique applies sound energy to agitate and disrupt biofilm, dislodging adherent bacterias to the bone cement, which has been proved to be a more sensitive method than conventional intraoperative cultures. False-negative percentages were reported to be 15% in patients who did not receive extended antibiotic prophylaxis and 60% if extended antibiotic therapy was administered. Regardless of an adequate clinical, radiographic and surgical suspicion confirming PJI, an organism is not always successfully isolated from the intraoperative cultures, which increases false negatives results. This fact has been trying to be explained by several authors, some of which postulate that antibiotic prophylaxis could interfere with the isolation of the microorganism from the intraoperative cultures. As a result, and acting accordingly to this hypothesis, preoperative antibiotics are often withheld until intraoperative cultures are obtained, hoping that tissues are not loaded with antibiotics. Nevertheless, one should be aware of the adverse consequences of this practice that may result in systemic dissemination of infection. Moreover, Ghanem and Stephen recently concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis does not interfere with the isolation of the microorganism from intraoperative cultures, despite being studies that lack statistical power. Therefore, it is clear that reported studies in this field support both preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administration, as well its withdrawal, until intraoperative cultures are obtained. This decision in the department study depends exclusively on the treating surgeon judgment. In fact, 48% of all patients admitted at the study hospital with PJI receive preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, which could be related to higher false-negative intraoperative culture and sonication results. Thus, the investigators add substances with chelation properties to hemoculture containers and then inoculate sonication samples. This practice offsets antibiotic interference with intraoperative cultures and has proved to enhance microorganism detection rates. That said, and given the lack of scientific evidence about this clinical practice the investigators are willing to engage a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial, that will allow us to determine whether intraoperative cultures and sonication samples are affected by antibiotic prophylaxis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 3, 2016
CompletedAugust 3, 2016
June 1, 2016
1.1 years
March 24, 2015
March 28, 2016
June 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Positive Cultures
Number of positive Tissue Cultures (7)
14 days
Sonication Cultures
Number of positive Sonication cultures (7)
14 days
Study Arms (2)
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORno antibiotic prophylaxis group
Study group cefazolin
ACTIVE COMPARATORClassical antibiotic prophylaxis
Interventions
Cefazolin (vancomycin in the case of allergy to cefazolin)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All the patients diagnosed with PJI who meet Zimmerli criteria and undergo a first-stage exchange, or débridment and retention procedure, in case there is an acute infection. These criteria are: visible sinus tract or purulence surrounding the prosthesis; detection of an infecting microorganism in the synovial fluid aspiration samples, intraoperative tissue and/or fluid cultures; synovial white blood cell count and histopathology parameters. The investigators will also include an additional criterion, which is prosthetic loosening 2 years after primary arthroplasty implantation following recent Portillo findings.
- The investigators will include hip, knee and shoulder replacements.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients receiving any kind of antibiotic regimen during the previous week of surgery;
- Hemodynamically unstable patients in need of antibiotic therapy, previously to the surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040181. No abstract available.
PMID: 15483283BACKGROUNDTrampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):654-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061588.
PMID: 17699815BACKGROUNDBurnett RS, Aggarwal A, Givens SA, McClure JT, Morgan PM, Barrack RL. Prophylactic antibiotics do not affect cultures in the treatment of an infected TKA: a prospective trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1014-4. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
PMID: 19669849BACKGROUNDPortillo ME, Salvado M, Alier A, Sorli L, Martinez S, Horcajada JP, Puig L. Prosthesis failure within 2 years of implantation is highly predictive of infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3672-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3200-7. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
PMID: 23904245BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Daniel Pérez-Prieto
- Organization
- Hospital del Mar
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel Pérez-Prieto, MD
Hospital del Mar
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2015
First Posted
April 9, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 3, 2016
Results First Posted
August 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share