Pragmatic Study Comparing the Clinical Evlauation Methods ( C) and / or Ultrasound Method ( B or D) in Rheumatoid Arthritis to Adapt Treatment
BCD
1 other identifier
interventional
561
1 country
10
Brief Summary
This study compares different methods of clinical evaluation (C) and/or ultrasound (B or D) concerning the rheumatoid arthritis in order to monitore the treatment. This study will provide the exact number of patients in remission according the 3 methods. It could allow to assess the concordance between the 3 evaluated methods. This study will permit to define the best method which limit the evolution of structural damages ( principal criteria).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Oct 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable rheumatoid-arthritis
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2022
CompletedDecember 12, 2023
December 1, 2023
6.1 years
April 2, 2015
December 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessement of the Xrays evolution at 1 year through adaptated treatment according to clinical or ultrasound remission criteria.
The primary outcome is to evaluate the Xrays evolution at 1 year ( at least one new erosion versus no erosion with the Sharp modified by van der Heijde) of rheumatoid arthritis patients (ACR/EULAR 2010) according to remission defined by modified SDAI in order to evaluate in all cases the same number of joints \[Simplified Disease Activity Index algebric sum of 5 parametres : number of painful joints (28 joints) , number of synovitis (38 joints), global evaluation of patient and practitioner with VAS, and PCR ≤ 3.3mg/l\] (mode C), with a combined approach clinical-ultrasound (same criteria but with MTPs and shoulders in B mode so a 26 joints evaluation with clinical examination and 12 joints evaluation in B mode) (mode B) or an ultrasound approach (remission défined as the absence of power Doppler on 38 joints (28 of SDAI plus 10 MTPs joints) (mode D) in a pragmatical context (study assessed by private rheumatologists and hospital rheumatologists).
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of the proportion of rheumatoid arthristis in remission according to the method used
at 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 1 year
Assessement of the Xrays evolution at 2 years
2 years
Study Arms (3)
Arm C (Clinical)
OTHERNo drug and no placebo were used in this arm. Patients were followed only by clinical évaluation.
Arm B (Clinical + Ultrasound)
OTHERNo drug and no placebo were used in this arm. Patients were followed by Clinical evaluation in combination with ultrasound (in B mode).
Arm D (Ultrasound)
OTHERNo drug and no placebo were used in this arm. Patients were followed by Ultrasound approach in D mode.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both gender patients aged 18 -to 80 years old
- Patients will be eligible if they fulfill ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis
- Patients would be able to understand and be agree with the protocole
- Patients would be able to consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unable to cooperate patient and who refuse to sign consent form
- Patient unable to understand the study,under administrative supervision or legal guardianship
- Signs and symptoms of uncontroled or severe progressive pathology at the level of renal, hepatic, hematological, endocrine, lung, cardiac, neurological or cerebral
- Scheduled surgery procedure during the study on the estimated joint.
- Patient non-affiliated to social security
- Pregnant and nursing mothers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
CHU Angers
Angers, 49100, France
CHRU Brest
Brest, 29609, France
CHU La Roche sur Yon
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925, France
CH Le Mans
Le Mans, 72037, France
CH de Lorient
Lorient, 56322, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
CHR Orléans
Orléans, 45067, France
CHU SUD Rennes
Rennes, 35203, France
CHU Tours
Tours, 37044, France
CH Vannes
Vannes, 56017, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2015
First Posted
April 7, 2015
Study Start
October 6, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2021
Study Completion
November 25, 2022
Last Updated
December 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12