Insufflation in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
Randomized, Double-blind Trial of CO2 vs. Air Insufflation in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Studies in adults have shown that post-procedural abdominal pain is reduced with the use of CO2 instead of air for insufflation during colonoscopy. The aim of our study is to compare post-procedural abdominal pain and girth in children undergoing colonoscopy using CO2 or air for insufflation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 15, 2015
December 1, 2015
9 months
March 18, 2015
December 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
to compare post-procedural abdominal pain in children undergoing colonoscopy using CO2 or air for insufflation.
NRS-11 pain scale will be used to assess abdominal pain, ranging from "no pain" marked as 0 point to "worst pain ever" marked as 10 points. Children will be asked to score the amount of pain experienced at 2, 4, and 24 hours after the examination.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
to compare post-procedural girth in children undergoing colonoscopy using CO2 or air for insufflation.
4 hours
Study Arms (2)
co2 arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORinsufflation with CO2
air arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORinsufflation with air
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- indication for colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- PM retardation
- postprocedural complications regarding sedation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UMC Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Related Publications (1)
Homan M, Mahkovic D, Orel R, Mamula P. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):993-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
PMID: 26363332DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matjaž Homan, PhD MD
UMC Ljubljana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2015
First Posted
April 3, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 15, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12