Comparing Conventional Dental Implants and Trabecular Metal™ Dental Implants After Sinus Floor Elevation

NCT02404649 | Completed Results DMC

• 1 other identifier: HarvardMS
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 33
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This is a research study to test the clinical outcome of Trabecular Metal™ Dental Implants (TMDI) (Zimmer Dental Inc Carlsbad, CA, US) in the Maxillary Sinus region. This project will enroll 30 active subjects who will receive two dental implants in the edentulous maxillary molar region. This 24-month research study will examine the clinical stability of TMDI in both sinus elevation and sinus augmentation environments. The proposed research lays the foundation for improved health care by providing surgeons and restorative dentists with data for determining the effects TMDI have on clinical success in less than optimal osseous environments. The rationale that underlies the investigation is that identification of the influences of trabecular surface design on implant stability in varying bone types will allow routine, predictable use of early loading, which, in turn, will translate into more rapid, economical health care, and improved psychosocial well-being of the patient. If these hypotheses are correct, the results are expected to provide evidence based research data to support early loading and immediate loading of single implants in sites of adequate bone volume, and density with or without the use of graft materials in sinus lift procedures. In addition, it is expected that these results will fundamentally advance the field of implant dentistry and bioengineering by providing information on the principles of the bone density-mechanical environment-implant stability interaction.

Conditions

Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge; Partial Edentulism

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Resonance Frequency Values of Dental Implants

  Implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100 and is measured by implant stability meters instruments using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) technique. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ. Lower initial stability will normally increase with time due to the lower mechanical stability being enforced by the bone remodeling process (osseointegration). The overall average ISQ value of all implants over time is approximately 70. A significant decrease in ISQ indicates a potential problem and should be considered an early warning. For each time period three measurements were taken from three different positions on the dental implant and the measurements were averaged for each time period.

  8 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Crestal Bone Levels

  2 years

Study Arms (2)

Bone Augmention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Two implant designs in a Sinus Bone Augmentation Procedure. Sinus bone augmentation with Puros Cortico-Cancellous Particulate Allograft (70% Cortico and 30% Cancelleous) (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA)- one implant will be TMDI (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the second will be Tapered Screw-Vent TSV-MTX (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA,USA). Implant stability will be determined by the initial insertion torque and RFV values at time of implant placement and after 1 month of healing on a monthly basis up until 12 months post implant placement.

Device: Two implant designs in a Sinus Bone Augmentation Procedure

Sinus elevation only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Two implant designs in a Sinus Floor Elevation Procedure. Placement of two dental implants as mentioned above in sinus bone augmentation by sinus elevation procedure, blood clot and CopiOs Pericardium Membrane (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA) only. One implant will be TMDI (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the second will be Tapered Screw-Vent TSV-MTX (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA,USA). Implant stability will be determined by the insertion torque and RFV values at time of implant placement and after 1 month of healing on a monthly basis up until 12 months post implant placement.

Device: Two implant designs in a Sinus Floor Elevation Procedure

Interventions

Two implant designs in a Sinus Bone Augmentation Procedure DEVICE

Comparing TMDI (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Tapered Screw-Vent TSV-MTX (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA,USA) biological behavior after a sinus bone augmentation procedure.

Bone Augmention

Two implant designs in a Sinus Floor Elevation Procedure DEVICE

Comparing TMDI (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Tapered Screw-Vent TSV-MTX (Zimmer Dental- Carlsbad, CA,USA) biological behavior after a sinus elevation only procedure.

Sinus elevation only

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 21 Years - 75 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• The subject male or female between 21-75 years of age and has:
• The ability to understand and sign the informed consent prior to starting the study
• The ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements
• Adequate oral hygiene
• The presence of a atrophic, pneumatized, partially edentulous maxilla requiring a lateral approach technique
• Adequate bone volume to accommodate the planned endosseous dental implant (e.g. sufficient height of bone (5 mm or greater) such that the implant would achieve primary stability, and sufficient width that the implant could be placed within the confines of the existing bone without dehiscence or fenestration. The only implant length utilized in this protocol will be a 10 mm long TMDI (Zimmer)
• Existing teeth that are healthy and adequately restored, and desired a fixed restoration on implants
• had a negative pregnancy test within one week prior to surgery, if of childbearing potential.

You may not qualify if:

• Subjects who have smoked cigarettes or chewed tobacco within the past year
• History of alcoholism or drug abuse within the past 5 years
• Subjects with Severe bruxing or clenching habits
• Untreated periodontitis
• Subjects at undue risk for an outpatient surgical procedure
• Subjects with the presence of residual roots at the implant site
• Subjects with history of site development (extensive bone augmentation) at the implant site in the past 4 months
• Placement of implant in an extraction site that had been healing for less than 2 month
• Presence of local inflammation or mucosal diseases such as lichen planus
• Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HA1c \> 7.0 percent)
• Subjects with current hematologic disorder or chronic use of Coumadin (or similar) anti-coagulant therapies
• Subjects with history of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies
• Subjects with Metabolic bone disorders
• Subjects with history of renal failure
• Subjects with history of liver disease

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM): lead

Study Sites (1)

Harvard School of Dental Medicine

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Dr. Kevin Guze
• Organization: Harvard School of Dental Medicine

kevin_guze@hsdm.harvard.edu

6177210707

Study Officials

• Kevin Guze, DMD DMSc MSc

  Harvard School of Medicine

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: No
• Restriction Type: LTE60
• Restrictive Agreement: Yes

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Clinical Instructor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 17, 2015
• First Posted: March 31, 2015
• Study Start: July 1, 2012
• Primary Completion: October 1, 2014
• Study Completion: December 1, 2017
• Last Updated: July 22, 2020
• Results First Posted: October 6, 2016

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (1)