Family and Social Intervention for Young People
YSBNT
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Family and Social Network Intervention for Young People Who Misuse Alcohol and Drugs: a Feasibility Study [Y-SBNT]
1 other identifier
interventional
53
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Research evidence shows that there is a high prevalence of substance use among young people in the UK. Early onset and high levels of use are associated with a range of negative outcomes, including increased risk of later problematic use and dependence. A growing body of research has identified family interventions to be effective in treating young people's substance use problems. However, despite this evidence, takeup of family based approaches, at least in the UK, has been low. A key factor appears to be the resource intensive nature of many family interventions, making them difficult to implement and deliver in many service settings, especially in the context of substantial cuts to drug and alcohol services for young people (1). Another potential barrier may be the cultural adaptation of approaches developed in the USA to a UK setting. There is growing awareness of the need to adapt evidence-based treatments to different cultural groups and settings in order to ensure successful implementation (2,3,4). Following on from developmental and adaptation work, this study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting young people to specifically developed family and network based intervention. In addition the feasibility of training staff from existing young people addiction services to deliver this intervention will be explored and treatment retention will be assessed. Qualitative interviews will elicit the participants' views on the acceptability of the intervention and their experiences of both it and the study process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 31, 2015
March 1, 2015
1.3 years
March 23, 2015
March 26, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Recruitment Rate
Quantitative assessment of the acceptability of the research will be assessed by numbers referred, number eligible and those agreeing to participate.
3 months
Retention in Treatment
Retention in treatment will be evaluated by number of sessions attended as a measure of acceptability of the interventions to participants.
3 months (12 weeks)
Follow up completion rates
Quantitative assessment of the number of follow-up interviews completed.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Qualitative Interviews
3 to 12 months
Emotional Well-being as measured by Social Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
12 months
Social Network Support as measured by Important People Drug and Alcohol interview (IPDA)
12 months
Family Environment as measured by Family Environment Scale (FES)
12 months
Working Alliance Inventory
3 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Activities and Engagement
12 months
Intervention effectiveness as measured by Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB)
90 days
Young peoples' involvement
24 months
Study Arms (2)
YSBNT Group
EXPERIMENTALSix 50 minute YSBNT sessions (delivered by a trained YSBNT practitioner) for over a maximum period of 12 weeks
Treatment as Usual Group
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care delivered by treatment-as-usual practitioners
Interventions
The Y-SBNT will be delivered according to the developed purpose-designed therapy manual. Participants randomised to Y-SBNT will be offered six, 50 minute SBNT sessions for over a maximum period of 12 weeks. Where consent is obtained, sessions will audio-recorded and reviewed by the research team to ensure fidelity with the YSBNT manual and principles of practice. Using the identification of the social network of the young person conducted in the first session as a platform, subsequent core strategies of the adapted YSBNT approach include motivational techniques, improving communication and coping mechanisms, and crucially given the nature of substance misuse, developing a network-based relapse management plan. Participants will be given the opportunity to invite members of their network to the treatment sessions. The therapeutic approach also has scope to address client-focussed elective areas, for example, educational requirements.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (i) Young people with drug and/or alcohol problems newly referred and accepted for treatment by the two agencies during the period of recruitment. (ii) Willing to provide written informed consent. (iii) Able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- (i) Concurrent severe mental illness that precludes them from active participation.
- (ii) Severe physical illness that precludes them from active participation. (iii) Unable or unwilling to give written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Birminghamlead
- University of Yorkcollaborator
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdomcollaborator
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Newcastle Universitycollaborator
Related Publications (1)
1.Drugscope. Charities warn of 'devastating impact' of cuts to young people's drug and alcohol services. 2011; 20 July. 2.Bernal G, JimenezChafey M, Domenech Rodriquez MM. Cultural adaptation of treatments: a resource for considering culture in evidencebased practice. Professional Psychology; Research and Practice. 2009: 40 (4); 361368. 3.Cortese CA (1999). Drug services and cultural adaptation. Drugs: education, prevention and policy. 1999: 6 (3); 361366 4.Lau, A.S. Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments: examples from parent training. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 2006: 13; 295310.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alex G Copello, PhD
University of Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Posted
March 26, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03