Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration
1 other identifier
interventional
77
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to establish whether premedication with topical lidocaine would reduce the pain associated with IN midazolam administration in children. The study was designed to be a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial performed in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2017
CompletedFebruary 23, 2017
January 1, 2017
7 months
March 11, 2015
August 9, 2016
January 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration
subject self-reports pain with intranasal midazolam utilizing the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale. This scale is a well-established ordinal pain scale for pediatric patients. It is one score (no subscales), with a minimum score of 0 (signifying "No Hurt") and a maximum score of 10 ("Hurts Worst"). Values between include 2 ("Hurts Little Bit"), 4 ("Hurts Little More"), 6 ("Hurts Even More"), and 8 ("Hurts Whole Lot."). Children indicate one value/answer. Thus, a higher score indicates a worse outcome (more pain).
immediately after administration of intranasal midazolam
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALPatient to receive 4% lidocaine intranasally prior to midazolam
Intranasal 0.9% saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatient to receive 0.9% Saline intranasally prior to midazolam
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 6-12
- Previously healthy
- Attending physician concludes that the patient would benefit from administration of an anxiolysis medication prior to a minor procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate to severe asthma or other chronic lung disease
- Co-morbid conditions including cerebral palsy, developmental delay, or other chronic illness deemed by the Attending physician to be unsafe to receive anxiolysis with Versed.
- Any child presenting with a life-threatening condition.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Smith D, Cheek H, Denson B, Pruitt CM. Lidocaine Pretreatment Reduces the Discomfort of Intranasal Midazolam Administration: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;24(2):161-167. doi: 10.1111/acem.13115. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
PMID: 27739142DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Christopher Pruitt
- Organization
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Smith, MD
UAB Department of Pediatrics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty Advisor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2015
First Posted
March 24, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 23, 2017
Results First Posted
February 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01