Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy
Endoscopic Naso-gallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Elective Cholecystectomy in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis and a High Suspicion of Common Bile Duct Stone; A Prospective Randomized Preliminary Study
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard therapy for acute cholecystitis, but temporary decompression of the gallbladder (GB) through percutaneous or endoscopic route can be required to alleviate inflammatory process and reach an appropriate time for elective surgery in patients with high operative risk or marked local inflammation or organ dysfunction. Also preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often needed because common bile duct (CBD) stone is accompanied in patients with acute cholecystitis at reported rate from 7-20%. Two-steps approach of percutaneous transhepatic GB drainage (PTGBD) followed by ERCP or vice versa has been performed for the treatment of acute cholecystitis with concomitant CBD stone who are not suitable for urgent cholecystectomy. However single-step drainage of CBD and GB through ERCP and endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage (ETGD) using nasocystic tube or plastic stent has alternatively been attempted in patients who have contraindications for PTGBD. In clinical practice, many endoscopists have hesitated to perform ETGD because of its relatively low technical success rate and specific concern about post-ERCP adverse event but it minimizes catheter keeping duration, and provides effective clinical improvement via physiologic route. Currently there are scarce data on if ETGD using nasocystic tube or plastic stent are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2015
CompletedJanuary 5, 2016
January 1, 2016
3.4 years
February 18, 2015
January 4, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Techncal success rate
This outcome was defined as successful deep GB cannulation and placement of assigned drainage device by randomization, and determined by the operator based on the fluoroscoic images of the procedures.
From the time of randomization until the time when the endoscopic procedure is ended, assessed up to 24hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical success rate
From the date of randomization until the date of clinical improvement (fever, leukocytosis, abdominal pain), assessed up to 72 hours
early adverse event
From the date of the randomization until the date of the elective cholecystectomy, assessed up to 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage
ACTIVE COMPARATORIf GB cannulation was achieved and the wire was coiled in the GB, 5 to 7-Fr Pigtail type naso-cholecystic drainage tube (Liguory nasal biliary drainage set; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA) was placed into the GB
Endoscopic gallbladder stenting
ACTIVE COMPARATORIf GB cannulation was achieved and the wire was coiled in the GB, 7-Fr double pigtail plastic stent (Zimmon; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA) was placed into the GB
Interventions
Endoscopic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- grade II or III acute cholecystitis met Tokyo 13 diagnostic criteria
- a high suspicion of CBD stone based on laboratory and imaging study
- informed consent given.
You may not qualify if:
- bilo-pancreatic malignancy or surgically altered enteric anatomy
- subsequent elective surgery is expected to be impossible even after GB decompression based on American Society of Anesthesiologist class
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggido, 443-380, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Byung Moo Yoo, MD
Ajou University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2015
First Posted
March 20, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01