Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Probe Drugs in the Geneva Phenotyping Cocktail
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Phenotyping is an approach largely used for the evaluation of the activity of cytochromes and transporters in vivo. It consists of the administration of probe substances metabolised by a specific cytochrome or transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) for example, followed by the determination of a metabolic ratio or the evaluation of the plasmatic or urinary concentrations of the probe substances. The administration of a cocktail containing several probe substances allows the simultaneous evaluation of the activity of several cytochromes and P-gp in a single test. When a cocktail approach is used it is important to make sure that no drug-drug interactions occur between the probes within the cocktail. The validation of the lack of interactions, which is the aim of the study, consists of demonstrating that there is no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters and/or metabolic ratios when a probe is administered alone or as part of the cocktail. The Geneva cocktail consists of caffeine, bupropion, flurbiprofen, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, midazolam and fexofenadine for the simultaneous phenotyping of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CAP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and P-gp, respectively. Probe and metabolite concentrations will be measured in capillary blood using a dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. To further facilitate sampling, a new simple device will be used to ensure the precision of capillary blood collection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 7, 2017
February 1, 2017
5 months
February 19, 2015
February 6, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of caffeine
Comparison of caffeine AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of dextromethorphan
Comparison of dextromethorphan AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of flurbiprofen
Comparison of flurbiprofen AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of midazolam
Comparison of midazolam AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of omeprazole
Comparison of omeprazole AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of fexofenadine
Comparison of fexofenadine AUC when treatment B or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment B or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of bupropion
Comparison of bupropion AUC when treatment C or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post treatment C or D
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Metabolic ratio (MR) of paraxanthine blood concentration /caffeine blood concentration
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of dextrorphan blood concentration /dextromethorphan blood concentration
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 4-hydroxyflurbiprofen blood concentration /flurbiprofen blood concentration
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 1-hydroxymidazolam blood concentration /midazolam blood concentration
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 5-hydroxyomeprazole blood concentration /omeprazole blood concentration
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Correlation of drug concentrations (ng/ml) in DBS obtained with two sampling techniques for all administered drugs
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A, B, C and D
Study Arms (4)
Treatment A
EXPERIMENTALOral intake of: caffeine 50 mg dextromethorphan 10 mg omeprazole 10 mg flurbiprofen 10 mg midazolam 1 mg
Treatment B
EXPERIMENTALOral intake of: fexofenadine 25 mg
Treatment C
EXPERIMENTALOral intake of: bupropion 20 mg
Treatment D
EXPERIMENTALOral Intake of Geneva cocktail (A+B+C): caffeine 50 mg dextromethorphan 10 mg omeprazole 10 mg flurbiprofen 10 mg midazolam 1 mg fexofenadine 25 mg bupropion 20 mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy volunteers aged from 18 to 60 years
- BMI between 18 and 27
- Understanding of French language and able to give a written inform consent.
You may not qualify if:
- smoker
- pregnant women
- taking drugs which alter cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity
- renal or hepatic impairment
- medical history of chronic alcoholism or abuse of psychoactive drugs
- liver transplantation
- sensitivity to any of the drugs used
- Alteration of hepatic tests, more than 2x normal (aspartate transaminase \>100U/L ; alanine transaminase \>100 units/L ; gamma-glutamyl transferase \>80 units/L ; bilirubin \>50µmol/L)
- Presenting genetic polymorphism of poor CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 metabolizer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jules Desmeuleslead
Study Sites (1)
Centre de Recherche Clinique, HUG, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2015
First Posted
March 18, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02