Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement
1 other identifier
observational
102
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2015
CompletedMarch 18, 2015
March 1, 2015
1 year
March 7, 2015
March 17, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)
Range of Motion of the hip
follow up of at least 1 year
Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture)
boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation
follow up of at least 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score)
follow up of at least 1 year
Study Arms (3)
Hyperion Prosthesis
Patients treated with the second generation long-stem revision prosthesis
Helios Prosthesis
Patients treated with the first generation long-stem revision prosthesis
Locking compression plate
Patients treated with LCP
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 102 patients with Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fractures and unstable femoral stem, which had been prospectively entered, in our hip-trauma database.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with pathological fractures,
- Vancouver type-A, Bl, and
- stable femoral prosthesis stem,
- Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2015
First Posted
March 18, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03