Volar Plate vs. Conventus DRS Fixation
Randomized Controlled Trial: Volar Plate vs. Conventus DRS Intramedullary Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable distal radius fractures is performed using a variety of fixation techniques. The most common method is fixed angle volar plate application. The investigators plan to compare the outcomes of fixed angle volar plating with a novel FDA approved intramedullary fixation device, Conventus DRS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.8 years
February 25, 2015
February 6, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in Complications at 2 weeks
Patients will be followed for up to one year after surgery to assess any complications which may develop. Complications will be defined as: * Stiffness (defined as inability to touch fingertips to distal palmar crease, OR 45 degrees or more loss of supination or pronation \[compared to uninjured wrist\], OR BOTH) * Loss of reduction * Hardware breakage * Hardware removal * Return to OR * Tendinopathy * Tendon rupture * Neuropathy * Superficial infection * Deep infection * Wound dehiscence * Incisional pain * Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) * None
2 weeks
Change from Baseline in Complications at 6 weeks
Patients will be followed for up to one year after surgery to assess any complications which may develop. Complications will be defined as: * Stiffness (defined as inability to touch fingertips to distal palmar crease, OR 45 degrees or more loss of supination or pronation \[compared to uninjured wrist\], OR BOTH) * Loss of reduction * Hardware breakage * Hardware removal * Return to OR * Tendinopathy * Tendon rupture * Neuropathy * Superficial infection * Deep infection * Wound dehiscence * Incisional pain * Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) * None
6 weeks
Change from Baseline in Complications at 3 months
Patients will be followed for up to one year after surgery to assess any complications which may develop. Complications will be defined as: * Stiffness (defined as inability to touch fingertips to distal palmar crease, OR 45 degrees or more loss of supination or pronation \[compared to uninjured wrist\], OR BOTH) * Loss of reduction * Hardware breakage * Hardware removal * Return to OR * Tendinopathy * Tendon rupture * Neuropathy * Superficial infection * Deep infection * Wound dehiscence * Incisional pain * Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) * None
3 months
Change from Baseline in Complications at 1 year
Patients will be followed for up to one year after surgery to assess any complications which may develop. Complications will be defined as: * Stiffness (defined as inability to touch fingertips to distal palmar crease, OR 45 degrees or more loss of supination or pronation \[compared to uninjured wrist\], OR BOTH) * Loss of reduction * Hardware breakage * Hardware removal * Return to OR * Tendinopathy * Tendon rupture * Neuropathy * Superficial infection * Deep infection * Wound dehiscence * Incisional pain * Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) * None
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Wrist Range of Motion
Up to 1 year
Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score
Up to 1 year
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire
Up to 1 year
Tourniquet time
Time of Surgery
Operative time
Time of Surgery
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Volar Plate
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will undergo distal radius fracture fixation with a traditional volar plate.
Conventus DRS
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will undergo distal radius fracture fixation with the Conventus DRS intramedullary fixation device.
Interventions
The Conventus DRS (TM) is an intramedullary device intended to treat distal radius fractures. The device remains flexible during placement, but is made rigid at the completion of the surgical implant procedure. The implant is made from titanium alloy (Ti-6A1-4V) and Nitinol.
A volar plate is a metallic plate fastened directly to the fractured bone with screws, to hold the fracture fragments in proper position. Volar plate fixation is the traditional surgical method for distal radius fractures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Skeletally mature patients (18-80)
- Unstable AO Type A and C1 fractures
- Closed injuries, acute (\<14 days), displaced, and unstable
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under the age of 18 or over the age of 85 (if included in our analysis, these would likely be outliers in our patient population)
- Patients with documented complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or history of CRPS
- Patients with suspected or known allergies to titanium or nickel
- Patients who are non-English speakers
- Patients with open wound fractures
- Patients with inflammatory arthritis
- Patients with positive pregnancy test
- Previous major wrist injury or surgery (not including Carpal Tunnel, De Quervain's and trigger finger release)
- Patients with previously diagnosed metabolic bone disease, currently being treated.
- Non-English speaking patients (validated, translated questionnaires are not available)
- Patients needing ipsilateral concomitant operations that will have material impact on the study
- Patients with previous wrist fractures, prior wrist injury, stiffness, degenerative joint disease, or pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Related Publications (8)
Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Zambianchi F, Adani R, Catani F. Volar plate fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures: analysis of adverse events. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):740-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182913fc5.
PMID: 23515129BACKGROUNDRozental TD, Blazar PE. Functional outcome and complications after volar plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.010.
PMID: 16516728BACKGROUNDArora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, Krappinger D, Espen D, Gabl M. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):316-22. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318059b993.
PMID: 17485996BACKGROUNDLimthongthang R, Bachoura A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Distal radius volar locking plate design and associated vulnerability of the flexor pollicis longus. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 May;39(5):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
PMID: 24630941BACKGROUNDGunther SB, Lynch TL. Rigid internal fixation of displaced distal radius fractures. Orthopedics. 2014 Jan;37(1):e34-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131219-14.
PMID: 24683654BACKGROUNDGradl G, Mielsch N, Wendt M, Falk S, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P, Gradl G. Intramedullary nail versus volar plate fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Two year results of a prospective randomized trial. Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.045. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
PMID: 24268189BACKGROUNDvan Kampen RJ, Thoreson AR, Knutson NJ, Hale JE, Moran SL. Comparison of a new intramedullary scaffold to volar plating for treatment of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Sep;27(9):535-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182793df7.
PMID: 23187156BACKGROUNDPalmer AK, Hale JE. Conventus DRS Plating System: A Preliminary Report [White paper]. Conventus Orthopedics 2013. Retrieved from <http://www.conventusortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/4473-1-Rev-2-White-Paper-Conventus-Distal-Radius-System-A-Preliminary-Report.pdf>.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott W Wolfe, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2015
First Posted
March 18, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02