NCT02380885

Brief Summary

The study evaluates the effectiveness of the social cognition and interaction training (SCIT), in comparison to both therapeutic alliance focused therapy (TAFT) and treatment as usual (TAU) among persons with severe mental illness. Study purpose: 1) Assess the effectiveness of the SCIT and TAFT interventions, 2) Assess the processes that putatively contribute to the SCIT and TAFT outcomes. Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with approximately one hundred and fifty persons with severe mental illness will be carried out in different psychiatric rehabilitation units and clinics in Israel. To assess the relative effectiveness of the SCIT and TAFT interventions with persons with severe mental illness, both interventions will be compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Clinicians will be trained in both interventions, and outcome measures, including social quality of life and social functioning, as well as mediating processes, including the identification of affective states, ToM, attribution errors and therapeutic alliance, will be assessed. Cognitive functioning and symptom severity will be treated as covariates. Statistical analyses will include analysis of variance which takes into consideration attrition, effect size, mediation processes and covariates.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2015

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2015

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2018

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2015

Results QC Date

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

severe mental illnesssocial cognitionintervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • The Face Emotion Identification Task (FEIT)

    A widely used measure of emotion perception and is indexed by the total number of correctly identified emotions out of nineteen pictured faces (higher number indicates better emotion identification).

    This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).

  • Faux-Pas Task

    The Faux Pas Task is a social cognition assessment tool that measures the ability to detect and understand social faux pas - situations where someone says something they shouldn't have said because they didn't know or realize certain information. Faux-Pas task in its Hebrew version (Shamay-Tsoory, Tomer, Berger, Goldsher, \& Aharon-Peretz, 2005) was used to assess TOM. It consist of 10 stories in which a faux pas has occurred and 10 control stories. It assesses emotional and cognitive attributions and the score for each story ranged between 0 to 7. After each story the participants are asked six questions regarding the recognition of faux-pas (understanding the mental state of speaker and listener, understanding the emotional state of the listener). The total score ranges from 0 to 70, when higher scores indicate better ability to detect social mistakes.

    This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).

  • Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ)

    The AIHQ is a measure of attributional style for situations with negative outcomes and ambiguous causality. Participants are asked to read each of five vignettes, to imagine that the scenario is happening to her or him, and to write down the reason why the other person acted the way he did toward the participant. Two independent raters subsequently code this written response for the purpose of computing a "hostility bias." The participant then rates the degree to which he or she thinks the other person performed the action on purpose, how angry this action would make the participant feel, and how much the participant would blame the other person. Four scales that are calculated: Hostility Bias, Blame Score, Aggression Bias, Intentionality Bias (each is a 5-point Likert scale) . In the total scores, each scale can be range from 0 (min) to 25 (max), with higher scores indicating greater attribution of hostile intent, blame, or aggressive response tendencies.

    This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).

  • Social Skill Performance Assessment

    The SSPA is a verbal role-play assessment in which the subject participates in two 3-minute role-play conversations ("scenes") with the assessor on pre-determined topics (e.g. "Your landlord has not fixed a leak that you told him about last week, and now you are calling him on the phone to follow-up."). Role-plays are tape-recorded and rated by independent coders. Each one of the 17 domains is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Thus, the total score for the task can be ranged from 0 (min) to 85 (max), with higher scores signifying greater social skills. The SSPA has good face validity as a social skill measure and among individuals with schizophrenia it shown excellent inter-rater reliability, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent validity with a measure of activities of daily living. It is a 5-point Likert-type scale with higher scores signifying greater social skill.

    This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Wisconsin Social Quality of Life Scale.

    This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).

Study Arms (3)

Social Cognition and Interaction Trainin

EXPERIMENTAL

Social Cognition and Interaction Training: psychosocial group intervention

Behavioral: SCIT

Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy

Behavioral: TAFT

Treatment as Usual

NO INTERVENTION

Treatment as Usual

Interventions

SCITBEHAVIORAL

psychosocial group intervention

Also known as: Social Cognition and Interaction Training
Social Cognition and Interaction Trainin
TAFTBEHAVIORAL

psychosocial group intervention

Also known as: Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy
Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective, bi-polar, depression).
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Ability to read and write in Hebrew.

You may not qualify if:

  • Co-morbid nuerological condition.
  • Hospitalization in the last 6 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Abarbanel center for mental health

Bat Yam, 59624, Israel

Location

Summit rehabilitation center

Jerusalem, 91101, Israel

Location

Shel Organization

Petah Tikva, Israel

Location

Enosh

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

Keeneret

Tiberias, 5290002, Israel

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hasson-Ohayon I, Mashiach-Eizenberg M, Lavi-Rotenberg A, Roe D. Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjunctive Social Cognition and Interaction Training, Adjunctive Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy, and Treatment As Usual Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00364. eCollection 2019.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Organization
Bar-Ilan University

Study Officials

  • Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

    Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2015

First Posted

March 5, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2018

Study Completion

July 1, 2018

Last Updated

March 6, 2025

Results First Posted

March 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations