RCT Social Cognition Training and Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy for Persons With Severe Mental Illness
Randomized Controlled Trial of Social Cognition Training and Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy for Persons With Severe Mental Illness
1 other identifier
interventional
158
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The study evaluates the effectiveness of the social cognition and interaction training (SCIT), in comparison to both therapeutic alliance focused therapy (TAFT) and treatment as usual (TAU) among persons with severe mental illness. Study purpose: 1) Assess the effectiveness of the SCIT and TAFT interventions, 2) Assess the processes that putatively contribute to the SCIT and TAFT outcomes. Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with approximately one hundred and fifty persons with severe mental illness will be carried out in different psychiatric rehabilitation units and clinics in Israel. To assess the relative effectiveness of the SCIT and TAFT interventions with persons with severe mental illness, both interventions will be compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Clinicians will be trained in both interventions, and outcome measures, including social quality of life and social functioning, as well as mediating processes, including the identification of affective states, ToM, attribution errors and therapeutic alliance, will be assessed. Cognitive functioning and symptom severity will be treated as covariates. Statistical analyses will include analysis of variance which takes into consideration attrition, effect size, mediation processes and covariates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2025
CompletedMarch 6, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.5 years
March 1, 2015
May 5, 2022
March 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The Face Emotion Identification Task (FEIT)
A widely used measure of emotion perception and is indexed by the total number of correctly identified emotions out of nineteen pictured faces (higher number indicates better emotion identification).
This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).
Faux-Pas Task
The Faux Pas Task is a social cognition assessment tool that measures the ability to detect and understand social faux pas - situations where someone says something they shouldn't have said because they didn't know or realize certain information. Faux-Pas task in its Hebrew version (Shamay-Tsoory, Tomer, Berger, Goldsher, \& Aharon-Peretz, 2005) was used to assess TOM. It consist of 10 stories in which a faux pas has occurred and 10 control stories. It assesses emotional and cognitive attributions and the score for each story ranged between 0 to 7. After each story the participants are asked six questions regarding the recognition of faux-pas (understanding the mental state of speaker and listener, understanding the emotional state of the listener). The total score ranges from 0 to 70, when higher scores indicate better ability to detect social mistakes.
This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).
Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ)
The AIHQ is a measure of attributional style for situations with negative outcomes and ambiguous causality. Participants are asked to read each of five vignettes, to imagine that the scenario is happening to her or him, and to write down the reason why the other person acted the way he did toward the participant. Two independent raters subsequently code this written response for the purpose of computing a "hostility bias." The participant then rates the degree to which he or she thinks the other person performed the action on purpose, how angry this action would make the participant feel, and how much the participant would blame the other person. Four scales that are calculated: Hostility Bias, Blame Score, Aggression Bias, Intentionality Bias (each is a 5-point Likert scale) . In the total scores, each scale can be range from 0 (min) to 25 (max), with higher scores indicating greater attribution of hostile intent, blame, or aggressive response tendencies.
This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).
Social Skill Performance Assessment
The SSPA is a verbal role-play assessment in which the subject participates in two 3-minute role-play conversations ("scenes") with the assessor on pre-determined topics (e.g. "Your landlord has not fixed a leak that you told him about last week, and now you are calling him on the phone to follow-up."). Role-plays are tape-recorded and rated by independent coders. Each one of the 17 domains is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Thus, the total score for the task can be ranged from 0 (min) to 85 (max), with higher scores signifying greater social skills. The SSPA has good face validity as a social skill measure and among individuals with schizophrenia it shown excellent inter-rater reliability, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent validity with a measure of activities of daily living. It is a 5-point Likert-type scale with higher scores signifying greater social skill.
This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Wisconsin Social Quality of Life Scale.
This outcome measure was assessed at baseline (Pre-intervention) and at 6 months later (Post-intervention).
Study Arms (3)
Social Cognition and Interaction Trainin
EXPERIMENTALSocial Cognition and Interaction Training: psychosocial group intervention
Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy
EXPERIMENTALTherapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy
Treatment as Usual
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment as Usual
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of severe mental disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective, bi-polar, depression).
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- Ability to read and write in Hebrew.
You may not qualify if:
- Co-morbid nuerological condition.
- Hospitalization in the last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bar-Ilan University, Israellead
- University of Haifacollaborator
- Israel Science Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Abarbanel center for mental health
Bat Yam, 59624, Israel
Summit rehabilitation center
Jerusalem, 91101, Israel
Shel Organization
Petah Tikva, Israel
Enosh
Tel Aviv, Israel
Keeneret
Tiberias, 5290002, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Hasson-Ohayon I, Mashiach-Eizenberg M, Lavi-Rotenberg A, Roe D. Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjunctive Social Cognition and Interaction Training, Adjunctive Therapeutic Alliance Focused Therapy, and Treatment As Usual Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00364. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31244686DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
- Organization
- Bar-Ilan University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2015
First Posted
March 5, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 6, 2025
Results First Posted
March 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03