ReCell® Combined With Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries
Demonstration of the Safety and Effectiveness of ReCell® Combined With Meshed Skin Graft for Reduction of Donor Area in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, within-subject controlled study to compare the clinical performance of the ReCell device when used as an adjunct to meshed skin graft in subjects requiring skin grafts for closure of burn injuries. Co-primary effectiveness endpoints include: (1) confirmed treatment area closure (i.e., healing) prior to or at 8 weeks as assessed by a blinded evaluator, and (2) a comparison of the actual expansion ratio, computed as the ratio of measured treated area to the measured donor site area, achieved for the ReCell-treated and control treatment areas. Safety will be evaluated in terms of long-term durability, scar outcomes and treatment-related adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2021
CompletedJanuary 7, 2025
December 1, 2024
12 months
February 17, 2015
September 25, 2018
December 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Confirmed Treatment Area Closure of RECELL-treated Wounds Compared to Control (Non-inferiority)
Complete wound closure is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage, confirmed at two consecutive study visits at least 2 weeks apart by direct visualization by a qualified clinician blinded to treatment assignment. The incidence of complete wound closure is hypothesized to be non-inferior for RECELL-treated areas as compared to control areas.
Prior to or at 8 weeks
Actual Expansion Ratios (Treatment Area to Donor Site Area, Inclusive of Donor Skin Needed for Secondary Treatments)
For this second co-primary endpoint, it is hypothesized that the expansion ratio associated with the RECELL treatment area will be superior to that of the control, i.e. less donor skin will be required for RECELL-treated areas compared with the control areas.
Prior to or at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Observer Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( POSAS) Opinion Score
At 24 Week
Patient's Satisfaction/Treatment Preference
At 24 Week
Patient Overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Opinion Score
Week 24
Study Arms (1)
All Participants (within patient control)
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will receive both ReCell and skin graft. Each patient serves as their own control. Their study treatment area (burn injury) will be divided into Area A and Area B. Investigational treatment will be randomly allocated to either Area A or Area B
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject requires skin grafting as a result of an acute thermal burn injury (i.e. injuries caused by exposure of the skin to fire/flames, excessive heat, hot steam or water).
- The area of total burn injury is 5-50% TBSA inclusive.
- Two areas requiring skin grafting, each at least 300cm2 (or 600cm2 contiguous), excluding hand/face and joints.
- The subject is at least 5 years of age.
- The subject (or family, for those under 18 years of age) is willing and able to complete all followup evaluations required by the study protocol.
- The subject is to abstain from any other treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless medically necessary.
- The subject agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study.
- The subject and/or guardian are able to read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject's burn injuries were caused by chemicals, electricity, and/or radioactive substances.
- The subject is unable to follow the protocol.
- The subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
- The subject has a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate for irrigation (Hartmann's) solution.
- Life expectancy is less than 1 year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Avita Medicallead
- MedDRA Assistance Inccollaborator
- Advanced Clinical Research Services, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Arizona Burn Center at Maricopa Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85008, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103-3409, United States
USAISR - US Army Institute of Surgical Research
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- VP Clinical Research
- Organization
- AVITA Medical
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James H Holmes, IV, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The participant and blinded evaluator will be not be told which treatment area received which treatment (RECELL or Control).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2015
First Posted
March 5, 2015
Study Start
January 26, 2015
Primary Completion
January 21, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 7, 2025
Results First Posted
February 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2024-12