Nucleus Hybrid L24 Extended Duration Post Approval Study
HED
The Nucleus Hybrid L24 Implant System: Extended Duration Post Approval Study
1 other identifier
interventional
35
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This post approval study evaluates the long term safety and efficacy of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 Implant System in a group of already implanted recipients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2021
CompletedNovember 30, 2021
October 1, 2021
4.2 years
January 29, 2015
April 5, 2021
October 31, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition in Quiet: Percentage of Total Words Correctly Recognized.
The CNC Words test consists of 10 recorded lists of 50 monosyllabic words in compact disk format. For this study, two lists were administered in quiet at a level equal to 60 dBA (decibels A-weighted) in the sound field and scored as total number of words correct, which will be expressed as a percentage correct. Minimum score is 0/100 words or 0% (worse), maximum score is 100/100 or 100% (best possible).
5 years postactivation.
AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute) Sentence Recognition in Noise: Percentage of Total Words Correctly Recognized.
The AzBio Sentence Test consists of 15 lists of 20 sentences each. AzBio sentences are spoken by different talkers in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict or 'fill in' unintelligible words. Each list includes 5 sentences from 4 different male and female speakers. Each word in the sentence counts towards the overall score. Minimum score is 0 out the total number of words in a given list (varies list to list, with an average length of 141 words) words or 0% (worse), maximum score is all words correctly repeated or 100% (best possible).
5 years postactivation.
Study Arms (1)
Hybrid L24 pivotal study subjects
EXPERIMENTALSubjects implanted with the Nucleus Hybrid L24 Implant as part of the pivotal IDE study and who still have the device implanted will continue to be followed for 5 years post activation
Interventions
Subjects have already been implanted with the Nucleus Hybrid L24 implant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Recipients who were implanted with the Hybrid L24 as part of the original pivotal IDE study
You may not qualify if:
- Recipients who withdrew or were terminated from the L24 pivotal IDE study
- Recipients who were re-implanted and no longer have a Nucleus Hybrid L24 implant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cochlearlead
- University of Iowacollaborator
- NYU Langone Healthcollaborator
- Midwest Ear Institutecollaborator
- University of Cincinnaticollaborator
- The Center for Hearing and Balance Disorderscollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Hearts for Hearingcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Reinhart PN, Parkinson AJ, Dunn CC, Gantz BJ. Factors Affecting Audiometric and Speech Perception Outcomes in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Recipients. Laryngoscope. 2025 Oct 8. doi: 10.1002/lary.70195. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41059917DERIVEDRoland JT Jr, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJ. Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1939-1945. doi: 10.1002/lary.27073. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
PMID: 29330858DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The non-study group presents a potential bias because it was comprised of a number who experienced significant changes in low-frequency acoustic hearing during the pivotal study and their outcomes beyond the pivotal study were not followed. Prior to the beginning of the post-approval study, 13 of the 18 subjects experienced profound/total loss of hearing between surgery and 18 months postactivation, compared with 9 of the 35 subjects who proceeded into the post-approval study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Aaron J Parkinson, PhD, Principal Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- Cochlear Americas
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce J Gantz, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2015
First Posted
March 4, 2015
Study Start
January 14, 2015
Primary Completion
March 18, 2019
Study Completion
March 18, 2019
Last Updated
November 30, 2021
Results First Posted
November 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10