A Study of the Implementation of an Electronic Consultation ("eConsult") Platform
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of an electronic consultation model for specialty services (eConsults) to improve quality of care and reduce health system costs. An eConsult is a non-face-to-face consultation between a primary care provider and a specialist that takes place via secure messaging.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
Started Oct 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2015
CompletedMarch 3, 2015
February 1, 2015
1.9 years
February 26, 2015
March 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to first contact with a cardiologist
For eConsults, time to first contact is the time between the generation of the eConsults and when the Cardiologist replies to the eConsults. For traditional referrals, first contact is the time between the creation of the appointment and the in-person Cardiology visi.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Completion of referrals
18 months
Adverse events
18 months
Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization
18 months
Provider Satisfaction (survey)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Number of in-person cardiology visits
18 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONProviders in the Control group followed standard care protocols. If they deemed a patient was in need of cardiology consultation, a referral was created using the standard process. The referral was processed by a referral coordinator and transmitted to an appropriate cardiologist. An appointment was then scheduled for the patient to have an in-person consultation with a cardiologist.
eConsult
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consisted of an eConsult pathway and standardized protocol for PCPs to obtain cardiology consults using a secure messaging "peer to peer" (P2P) module embedded within the EHR. Intervention providers were asked to send all cardiology referrals for their adult patients through the eConsult system. Providers could bypass the eConsult pathway for patients with established relationships with a cardiologist or for whom providers felt a consult was urgent (required a face-to-face visit within a week or less). eConsults contain reason for consult, relevant test results, records or reports but are sent electronically to a Cardiology Consultant for review. eConsults were responded to within two business days. Responses were case-specific and generally contained recommendations for management, additional testing, or a face-to-face cardiology visit. The PCP was responsible for considering/acting upon recommendations and determining when an eConsult was complete.
Interventions
An electronic consultation or "eConsult" is a secure message consult that allows specialists to provide advice on cases without seeing a patient face to face. They contain a reason for consult, any relevant tests, procedures or reports. The responsibility lies with the primary care provider to act, or not act on the advice as they deem fit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary Care Provider at Community Health Center, Inc who work at least 30 hours per week and see adult patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Community Health Center, Inc.lead
- Connecticut Health Foundationcollaborator
- University of Connecticutcollaborator
- UConn Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Community Health Center, Inc
Middletown, Connecticut, 06457, United States
Related Publications (10)
Chen AH, Yee HF Jr. Improving primary care-specialty care communication: lessons from San Francisco's safety net: comment on "Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians". Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):65-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.484. No abstract available.
PMID: 21220663BACKGROUNDYee HF Jr. The patient-centered medical home neighbor: A subspecialty physician's view. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):63-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00011.
PMID: 21200042BACKGROUNDChen AH, Kushel MB, Grumbach K, Yee HF Jr. Practice profile. A safety-net system gains efficiencies through 'eReferrals' to specialists. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):969-71. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0027. No abstract available.
PMID: 20439891BACKGROUNDFoy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 16;152(4):247-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00010.
PMID: 20157139BACKGROUNDKim Y, Chen AH, Keith E, Yee HF Jr, Kushel MB. Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May;24(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
PMID: 19308334BACKGROUNDKim-Hwang JE, Chen AH, Bell DS, Guzman D, Yee HF Jr, Kushel MB. Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1123-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1402-1. Epub 2010 May 29.
PMID: 20512531BACKGROUNDKatz MH. Golden gate to health care for all? San Francisco's new universal-access program. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):327-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0706590. No abstract available.
PMID: 18216352BACKGROUNDBindman AB, Chen A, Fraser JS, Yee HF Jr, Ofman D. Healthcare reform with a safety net: lessons from San Francisco. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Oct;15(10):747-50.
PMID: 19845426BACKGROUNDWeiner M, El Hoyek G, Wang L, Dexter PR, Zerr AD, Perkins AJ, James F, Juneja R. A web-based generalist-specialist system to improve scheduling of outpatient specialty consultations in an academic center. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):710-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0971-3. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
PMID: 19367375BACKGROUNDFischer BS, Martinez E, Driscoll M, Conway T. Practice profile. Chicago: using evidence-based rules to make smarter referrals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):972-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0068. No abstract available.
PMID: 20439892BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J. Nwando Olayiwola, MD, MPH
Center for Excellence in Primary Care, University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daren Anderson, MD
Weitzman Institute, Community Health Center, Inc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2015
First Posted
March 3, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02