NCT02374918

Brief Summary

The purpose of the research study is to understand the effectiveness of a six-week course of light exposure on cognitive functioning, mood, activity, and sleep in people that have suffered a head injury leading to a concussion.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2015

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 24, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

October 15, 2014

Results QC Date

February 16, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Mild traumatic brain injuryConcussionSleep problemsBrain imagingfMRI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Sleep Quality - Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) subscale measurement that was used is overall sleep quality, which is derived from question 6 on the assessment and uses a Likert scale of 0 to 3. A score of 0 represents "very good" sleep quality (better outcome), while a measurement of 3 represents "very bad" sleep quality (worse outcome).

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Sleep Quality - Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency

    Sleep Efficiency is the overall percentage of time that the participant was scored as sleeping during their night of sleep (range: 0-100%). Higher percentages suggest higher sleep quality and a better outcome.

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Sleep Quality - Actigraphy Wake After Sleep Onset

    Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) is how many minutes the participant, during their night of sleep, was determined to be awake after their sleep onset. Sleep onset is defined as a state of at least 2 minutes of uninterrupted sleep. Higher values indicate a worse outcome (range: 1-125 minutes).

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Executive Function Task - Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT)

    Neural activation during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measuring executive functioning using the MSIT.

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Performance on Neuropsychological Assessment - Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics

    The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) is a neuropsychological battery that uses individual tests to measure cognitive efficiency in areas including attention, concentration, reaction time, memory, processing speed, and decision making. Subscale scores are put in terms of a throughput score, which is calculated to be a ratio of correct responses per minute, as a way to measure cognitive efficiency in the participant; as such, the units for the throughput scores would be in terms of correct responses/minute. Higher throughput scores indicate increased levels of cognitive efficiency in the relevant subscale. The throughput score ranges for the ANAM subscales are: code substitution learning: 0-147 responses per minute procedural reaction time: 0-151 responses per minute mathematical processing: 0-145 responses per minute matching to sample: 0-97 responses per minute code substitution delayed: 0-155 responses per minute

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Performance on Neuropsychological Assessment - Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status

    The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) uses all of its subscales to calculate the RBANS total score (index). To obtain the RBANS total score (index), the raw scores of the subtests must first be computed into index scores for their relevant subscale (different subtest raw scores feed into specific subscales) using RBANS specific tables that have scaled scores embedded and are normed for the age of the participant. The index scores of each subscale are then summed together to get the Sum of Index Scores, which has a possible range of 200-800. Once the Sum of Index Scores is found, the total score (index) is then found using another RBANS specific table with scaled scores embedded within it. The total score (index) has a possible range of 40-160, with a higher total score (index) is related to a better outcome.

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Performance on Neuropsychological Assessment - Psychomotor Vigilance Task

    The Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) is a task that tests alertness by having the participant press a button every time they see a stimulus image appear on a screen. This image is presented at random 2-10 second intervals throughout the entirety of the task. The reaction time (RT) is one of the PVT measurements and is the time, measured in milliseconds, that it takes for the participant to view the stimulus image and then press the button, confirming that they have indeed viewed the stimulus image at that time. The PVT measures speed using the following equation: 1/RT \* 1000. The PVT measurement used here is average speed, so all the calculated speeds were then averaged over the entire trial period to obtain the final value for that trial at that time point (post-tx 1,2,3). Since the PVT is a timed measurement of reaction times, lower scores are considered 'better' or indicate an increased level of vigilance.

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Daytime Sleepiness - Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item questionnaire that characterizes the likelihood of the participant 'dozing off' during typical daily activities over their last 2 weeks, and uses a 0-3 point Likert scale, where 0 corresponds to "Would never doze" and 3 corresponds to having a "High chance of dozing" during the activity in question. The ESS score is calculated by adding up all the scores for each question, which means that the ESS score has a range of 0-24, while a higher score indicates that the participant had more issues with daytime sleepiness (worse outcome).

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Daytime Sleepiness - Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire

    The Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) questions 1-26 use a 1-4 (ordinal) likert (1 = "No difficulty" with sleepiness, 4 = "Yes, extreme difficulty" with sleepiness) and the participant also has the option of putting 0 = "I don't do this activity for other reasons". FOSQ questions 27-30 use a 1-4 Likert scale where 1 = "Very low" in terms of characterizing the level that sleepiness affects different aspects of their intimate romantic relations, while a 4 = "High" amount of impact on their intimate romantic relations. The FOSQ total score measurement is determined by calculating the mean of all 5 subscale scores and then multiplying that value by 5 (range: 0-24). A higher score indicates that the participant had more issues with daytime sleepiness.

    Post 6-week intervention

  • Post-Concussive Symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire)

    The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPCSQ) will be used to assess post-concussive symptoms related to sleep. All questions on the RPCSQ use a 0 to 4 Likert scale concerning the severity of experiencing differing symptoms, where 0 = "not experienced" and 4 = "severe problem". As such, having a higher score is indicative that the participant is having more serious sleep issues related to their head injury. The RPCSQ subscale measurements that were used below are: RPQ3, which is the summed scores from the first 3 questions on the form, with the subscale total ranging from 0-12, and RPQ13, which is the summed scores from questions 4 to 16 on the form, with the subscale total ranging from 0-52. The RPQ3 subscale is associated with earlier symptom clusters of post-concussive symptoms as they relate to sleep disturbances, while the RPQ13 subscale is associated with later symptom clusters of post-concussive symptoms as they relate to sleep disturbances.

    Post 6-week intervention

Study Arms (4)

mTBI wavelength-1 bright light

EXPERIMENTAL

30 minutes daily light exposure for 6 weeks

Device: mTBI wavelength-1 bright light

mTBI wavelength-2 bright light

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

30 minutes daily light exposure for 6 weeks

Device: mTBI wavelength-2 bright light

HC wavelength-1 bright light

EXPERIMENTAL

30 minutes of light exposure

Device: HC wavelength-1 bright light

HC wavelength-2 bright light

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

30 minutes of light exposure

Device: HC wavelength-2 bright light

Interventions

6 weeks of daily light exposure, 30 minutes per morning

mTBI wavelength-1 bright light

6 weeks of daily light exposure, 30 minutes per morning

mTBI wavelength-2 bright light

30 minutes of light exposure

HC wavelength-1 bright light

30 minutes of light exposure

HC wavelength-2 bright light

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age range between 18 and 50.
  • The primary language of the subjects must be English.
  • Subjects have experienced a "concussion" or mTBI within the preceding 18 months, but no sooner that 4 weeks prior to their screening. The occurrence of a concussion or mTBI must be documented by a medical report or other professional witness documentation.
  • If documented, Glasgow Coma Scale in the range of 13-15 following the injury.
  • Subjects must have complaints of sleep difficulties that emerged or worsened following the most recent head injury.
  • At least half of subjects must have evidence of sleep onset insomnia or delayed sleep phase disorder.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any other history of neurological illness, current Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Axis I disorder, lifetime history of psychotic disorder, or head injury with loss of consciousness \> 30 minutes
  • Complicating medical conditions that may influence the outcome of neuropsychological assessment or functional imaging (e.g., HIV, brain tumor, etc.)
  • Abnormal visual acuity that is not corrected by contact lenses
  • Metal within the body, claustrophobia, or other contraindications for neuroimaging
  • Less than 9th grade education
  • Excess current alcohol use (more than 2 instances of intake of 5+ drinks (men) when or 4+ drinks (women) when drinking in the past two months, and/or on average drinking \> 2 drinks per day (men); \> 1 drinks per day (women) during the past two months
  • History of alcoholism or substance use disorder
  • Significant use of illicit drugs
  • History of marijuana use within the past 6 weeks and/or use of marijuana before the age of 16.
  • Subjects who engage in shift-work, night work, or who have substantially desynchronized work-sleep schedules (i.e., sleeping later than 10:00 a.m. more than once a week) will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain ConcussionPost-Concussion SyndromeParasomnias

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBrain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemHead Injuries, ClosedWounds and InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingSleep Wake DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. William "Scott" Killgore
Organization
University of Arizona

Study Officials

  • William D Killgore, Ph.D.

    University of Arizona

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2014

First Posted

March 2, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 24, 2021

Results First Posted

June 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations