A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Acellular Dermal Template for the Treatment of Full Thickness Skin Defects
A Phase 2, Intra-patient Randomised Controlled Multicentre International Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Acellular Dermal Template Novomaix for the Treatment of Full Thickness Skin Defects
2 other identifiers
interventional
11
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
In this study the efficacy of an acellular dermal template (Novomaix), combined with split thickness skin grafts, for use in patients with full thickness skin defects, is tested. Results will be compared intra-patient with those obtained after conventional treatment with split thickness skin grafts. The investigators expect this treatment to provide better outcome regarding scar quality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
1 year
February 23, 2015
February 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Scar quality as assessed for scar elasticity (experimental vs control area) as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)
Scar elasticity as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)
3 months post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Graft take (Subjective assessment by experienced observer)
5-7 days
Epithelialisation (Subjective assessment by experienced observer)
5-7 days and 2-3 weeks post-operative
Scar quality (Scar elasticity as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using POSAS questionnaire)
12 months
Scar quality (As determined with subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)
3 and 12 months
Scar quality (As measured for scar colour and pigmentation using DSM II ColorMeter)
3 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Dermal substitute with STSG
EXPERIMENTALNovomaix dermal substitute in combination with STSG
STSG alone
NO INTERVENTIONSTSG alone
Interventions
Novomaix dermal substitute in combination with STSG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years (for Zurich: ≤ 18 years)
- Full thickness skin defects configured in such a way that two comparable and measurable areas can be grafted, both of minimally 3x3 cm
- ≤ 50% TBSA full thickness skin defects at time of intervention
- Informed consent by the patient and/or legal representatives.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with infected wounds
- Full thickness skin wounds located in face and/or genitals will not be included
- Pregnant or breast feeding females
- Patients with known concomitant medical conditions that may interfere with normal wound healing (e.g. immune deficiency, HIV, uncontrolled diabetes, treatment with corticoid therapy, collagenoses, cancer)
- Known allergy against porcine collagen or elastin
- Patients that are expected (according to the responsible medical doctor) to be non-compliant to the study protocol. (This includes patients with severe cognitive dysfunction/impairment and severe psychiatric disorders)
- Previous enrolment of the patient into the current study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Association of Dutch Burn Centreslead
- Ernst Reichmann Tissue Biology Research Unit, Zürichcollaborator
- Seventh Framework Programmecollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Zentrum für Schwerbrandverletzte mit Plastischer Chirurgie
Berlin, 12683, Germany
Red Cross Hospital
Beverwijk, North Holland, 1942 LE, Netherlands
Children's Hospital Department of Surgery Kinderspital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Boekema BK, Vlig M, Olde Damink L, Middelkoop E, Eummelen L, Buhren AV, Ulrich MM. Effect of pore size and cross-linking of a novel collagen-elastin dermal substitute on wound healing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Feb;25(2):423-33. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5075-2. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
PMID: 24178984BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Esther Middelkoop, Prof. dr.
Red Cross Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- participant and assessor are both unaware of location of dermal template
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2015
First Posted
February 27, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02